otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 36,279
- 11,622
Are you really going to try to deflect the Kansas state constitutional question wasn't about privacy?How so? Read the ballot to us that makes you think that?
Hilarious
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Are you really going to try to deflect the Kansas state constitutional question wasn't about privacy?How so? Read the ballot to us that makes you think that?
Wasn’t about abortion on demand. Read it.Are you really going to try to deflect the Kansas state constitutional question wasn't about privacy?
Hilarious
I did. Can you state what you're suggesting? Edit: not a criticism.Wasn’t about abortion on demand. Read it.
What I said! Post the for and againstI did. Can you state what you're suggesting?
You mean the male? You better believe it. Unless he actually behaves as a father, he's a total negative and the REASON for abortions.or the contributor for the creation of the baby.
It wasn't about privacy ------ it was about getting to have abortions.Are you really going to try to deflect the Kansas state constitutional question wasn't about privacy?
Hilarious
Yes, it was about the right privacy which the QOP supreme court ruled doesn't exist.Wasn’t about abortion on demand. Read it.
all of the aboveFor decades, I have wondered why the the leftist leaders fights tooth and nail to keep abortion legal.
There's the reason they put forth, that they care about women's health which is obviously nonsense. Camouflage to hide the real reason.
But what IS the real reason?
1) Is it money? Is it driven by the billion dollar abortion mill industry led by PP?
2) Is it political power? Does the left think blacks value abortion so much, they have to fight to keep it legal in exchange for votes? I find it hard to believe abortion would be THAT important to blacks.
3) Is it a ideological, meaning is it a tool of the Marxist left to create the notion that devaluing human life is acceptable, thereby setting the table for a Marxist takeover?
I'm really not sure. Does anyone know the answer?
60 to 40 says it was about the right of privacy.It wasn't about privacy ------ it was about getting to have abortions.
Duh.
That's not what the referendum said. Has nothing to do with privacy (never did; that was always nonsense) --- it's about whether we women can legally get an abortion when we need one.60 to 40 says it was about the right of privacy.
They make him a negativeYou mean the male? You better believe it. Unless he actually behaves as a father, he's a total negative and the REASON for abortions.
60 to 40 says its about the right of privacy.That's not what the referendum said. Has nothing to do with privacy (never did; that was always nonsense) --- it's about whether we women can legally get an abortion when we need one.
I also hate the euphemism that it's about "women's health care." Oh, give me a break!! What nonsense. Pregnancy is hardly an illness!! Abortion is hardly "health care"! Migod.
Wrong.That's not what the referendum said. Has nothing to do with privacy (never did; that was always nonsense) --- it's about whether we women can legally get an abortion when we need one.
I also hate the euphemism that it's about "women's health care." Oh, give me a break!! What nonsense. Pregnancy is hardly an illness!! Abortion is hardly "health care"! Migod.
Because the ‘left’ is adamant about protecting the rights and liberties of all Americans from government excess and overreach – such as conservatives violating a woman’s right to privacy by compelling her to give birth against her will through force of law.Question I've Always Wondered: Why is the Left So Adamant about Abortion Remaining Legal?
I think those types start out a negative.They make him a negative
so people have to kill to have privacy?60 to 40 says it was about the right of privacy.
Agreed: I have to say this is a disjunct ---- as a conservative I believe in freedom, especially of government interference with our bodies. No mandated shots!! No mask wearing!! No prohibitions against abortion!!!Because the ‘left’ is adamant about protecting the rights and liberties of all Americans from government excess and overreach – such as conservatives violating a woman’s right to privacy by compelling her to give birth against her will through force of law.
Yes, being compelled to raise some loser's get until they are adults is definitely an infringement on privacy!!!!so people have to kill to have privacy?
I don't get it
it's not about privacy. It's about people being willing to kill to have freedom from responsibility. Freedom is not a god, not an absolute right. A person's right to swing his fist ends at my face (or the face of my neighbor whom I am called by God to love, not kill)
you drank the elite leftists' Kool Aid... sadBecause the ‘left’ is adamant about protecting the rights and liberties of all Americans from government excess and overreach – such as conservatives violating a woman’s right to privacy by compelling her to give birth against her will through force of law.
what?Yes, being compelled to raise some loser's get until they are adults is definitely an infringement on privacy!!!!