Questions...

So your Earth shattering question is who made god? That's it? There is no beginning in a timeless state. Time started when the universe came into being. Whether one chooses a spiritual or secular cause you can't get away from it, either god was always present or the universe was always present (or its' potential).
Scientists are starting to lean towards our universe not being the first or only universe. So time has existed before our universe.
Let us know when you stop pulling shit out of your ass.
So you have no real answer to what I said except to go bezerk. Got it.
I made fun of you since you had nothing but speculation and think it's fact. We don't get to see that level of stupid every day. Even here. Get that, dumbfuck.
Again, nothing but schoolyard taunts with no substance. But I'm guessing you think you really got me with the last one. :D
I even explained it to you. LOL
 
Scientists are starting to lean towards our universe not being the first or only universe. So time has existed before our universe.
Let us know when you stop pulling shit out of your ass.
So you have no real answer to what I said except to go bezerk. Got it.
I made fun of you since you had nothing but speculation and think it's fact. We don't get to see that level of stupid every day. Even here. Get that, dumbfuck.
Again, nothing but schoolyard taunts with no substance. But I'm guessing you think you really got me with the last one. :D
I even explained it to you. LOL
So what so what proof do you have that there's only one universe?
 
.
Time is within the Everlasting for there to be a physical component to existence.

.
 
So your Earth shattering question is who made god? That's it? There is no beginning in a timeless state. Time started when the universe came into being. Whether one chooses a spiritual or secular cause you can't get away from it, either god was always present or the universe was always present (or its' potential).
Scientists are starting to lean towards our universe not being the first or only universe. So time has existed before our universe.
Let us know when you stop pulling shit out of your ass.


Our Universe Could be One Of Billions, Paper Explains
"Other Universes are Pulling on Our Universe" -- New Planck Data Triggers Controversy (Today's Most Popular)

Just because you don't follow science in the last decade dose not make others wrong, just you
 
So your Earth shattering question is who made god? That's it? There is no beginning in a timeless state. Time started when the universe came into being. Whether one chooses a spiritual or secular cause you can't get away from it, either god was always present or the universe was always present (or its' potential).
Scientists are starting to lean towards our universe not being the first or only universe. So time has existed before our universe.
Let us know when you stop pulling shit out of your ass.


Our Universe Could be One Of Billions, Paper Explains
"Other Universes are Pulling on Our Universe" -- New Planck Data Triggers Controversy (Today's Most Popular)

Just because you don't follow science in the last decade dose not make others wrong, just you
Pure comedy. You tards think controversy and speculation are science facts.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.


Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.


Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.

only if "you" believe in a god, your god. Not for the rest of the world, the majority, that don't go by your reading of your book.

God and religion are only relevant to you, not everyone else.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.
Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.
WRONG. You read man's word and reasoning falsely is abandoning rational thought.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.


Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.

only if "you" believe in a god, your god. Not for the rest of the world, the majority, that don't go by your reading of your book.

God and religion are only relevant to you, not everyone else.


Your statement is false-- to billions God and religion is relevant.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.
Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.
WRONG. You read man's word and reasoning falsely is abandoning rational thought.


Then you can prove that God didn't inspire the bible writers then????
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.
Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.
WRONG. You read man's word and reasoning falsely is abandoning rational thought.
Then you can prove that God didn't inspire the bible writers then????
I could if someone had a functioning brain. No god could be so screwed up and get so much wrong and leave loopholes the size of mountains.

So the rational mind would have to conclude it was a work of man (especially if they know some history of the early church) instead of a deeply flawed god.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.


Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.

only if "you" believe in a god, your god. Not for the rest of the world, the majority, that don't go by your reading of your book.

God and religion are only relevant to you, not everyone else.


Your statement is false-- to billions God and religion is relevant.
Especially to Muslims.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.
Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.
WRONG. You read man's word and reasoning falsely is abandoning rational thought.
Then you can prove that God didn't inspire the bible writers then????
I could if someone had a functioning brain. No god could be so screwed up and get so much wrong and leave loopholes the size of mountains.

So the rational mind would have to conclude it was a work of man (especially if they know some history of the early church) instead of a deeply flawed god.


There are errors found in trinity translations. But the New world translation has corrected the errors.
 
Scientific thought processes won't always get you very far; you'll need a little more oomph if you don't want to fall off the narrow path. Analytical reasoning is a wonderfully endowed gift that has been fruitfully propitious for many hardworking individuals, but you will sink into the sand if you're not found leaning adroitly upon the rock of all faith.
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.


Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.

only if "you" believe in a god, your god. Not for the rest of the world, the majority, that don't go by your reading of your book.

God and religion are only relevant to you, not everyone else.


Your statement is false-- to billions God and religion is relevant.
Especially to Muslims.


There are a gazillion different religions on earth--one has truth. Yet every one believes it is them.
 
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.
Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.
WRONG. You read man's word and reasoning falsely is abandoning rational thought.
Then you can prove that God didn't inspire the bible writers then????
I could if someone had a functioning brain. No god could be so screwed up and get so much wrong and leave loopholes the size of mountains.

So the rational mind would have to conclude it was a work of man (especially if they know some history of the early church) instead of a deeply flawed god.


There are errors found in trinity translations. But the New world translation has corrected the errors.
Yes, of course. The Jehovah's Witnesses are the only ones that could do it correctly.
 
That was a little hard to follow but any time we suspend rational thought we are screwing ourselves and given home to feel good isms.


Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.

only if "you" believe in a god, your god. Not for the rest of the world, the majority, that don't go by your reading of your book.

God and religion are only relevant to you, not everyone else.


Your statement is false-- to billions God and religion is relevant.
Especially to Muslims.


There are a gazillion different religions on earth--one has truth. Yet every one believes it is them.
That goes without saying. But the point is you believe what you've been told and read, from men. No one can know with certainty but we can eliminate things by rational thought.
For example, god would not have people disfellowship friends and relatives, including your own mother, over stupid shit like smoking a cigarette.
 
Gods word teaches--The Heart is treacherous and desperate who can know it? Easily one can reason falsely.

only if "you" believe in a god, your god. Not for the rest of the world, the majority, that don't go by your reading of your book.

God and religion are only relevant to you, not everyone else.


Your statement is false-- to billions God and religion is relevant.
Especially to Muslims.


There are a gazillion different religions on earth--one has truth. Yet every one believes it is them.
That goes without saying. But the point is you believe what you've been told and read, from men. No one can know with certainty but we can eliminate things by rational thought.
For example, god would not have people disfellowship friends and relatives, including your own mother, over stupid shit like smoking a cigarette.


He ended Lots wifes life because she looked back. Many sins were to be stoned to death in the ot--no chance for repentence--disfellowshipping is much more loving. Because they can repent. Which would you choose for your family member?
 

Forum List

Back
Top