Rabid Dogs Object to Being Compared to Muslim Radicals

[mikegriffith1]

For some bizarre reason, liberals are upset that Ben Carson compared radical Muslim extremists to rabid dogs. Anyone who can understand English can see that that's what Carson was saying. He was not talking about all Syrians, but only about any who are terrorists or who support terrorism. In any case, in a related story, owners of rabid dogs report that their dogs are very upset over being compared to Muslim extremists.

 

[eagle1462010]

The Left has no problem lying to the people for political reasons........

His statement was about radical elements inside the refugee crisis........

But the Truth need not apply to liberals.

 

[Lakhota]

Please, NaziCons, keep this up until November 2016.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"For some bizarre reason, liberals are upset that Ben Carson compared radical Muslim extremists to rabid dogs."

This fails as a composition fallacy.

Only this lie is bizarre, as are those on the right who believe such nonsense.

 

[eagle1462010]

"For some bizarre reason, liberals are upset that Ben Carson compared radical Muslim extremists to rabid dogs."

This fails as a composition fallacy.

Only this lie is bizarre, as are those on the right who believe such nonsense.

I've called them worse......................Don't want another infraction for repeating what I've called Radical Islam before..................

Rabid Dogs...............Hell Muslims are calling them Son of Dogs.......................

 

[TheOldSchool]

Ben Carson's an idiot. His campaign will fold soon.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Maybe he was referring to the terrorists that were burning/blowing people up just for laughs?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Hmmm, were Christian Crusaders rabid dogs?

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Hmmm, were Christian Crusaders rabid dogs?

do you actually think that people identify with Christian crusaders of the Middle Ages? Why not ask Greeks if they associate their identity with Plato? It just sounds like a redicolous comparison but I'm dealing with communist so what can I expect.

 

[mikegriffith1]

The local news channel understood that Carson was referring to radical Muslims, not to all Muslims/Syrians. They titled the news clip "Islamist Extremists Are Like Rabid Dogs." Carson said if you have a rabid dog and you don't want to let your kids near that dog, that doesn't mean you hate all dogs. So clearly he was not talking about "all" Syrians or Muslims, but only about those who have proven willing to do us harm.

No person with a working brain could watch the news clip--it's in the OP--and come away thinking that Carson was talking about all Muslims or all Syrians or "all" anything. And notice that the local news reporter who filed the news clip also understood that Carson was talking about Muslim extremists.

So once again liberals are just outright lying about what Carson says.

 

[Mac1958]

Hmmm, were Christian Crusaders rabid dogs?

Right on cue.

But the Crusades, the Crusades!

Don't look at the horrific slaughter being perpetrated by modern day Jihadists at this very moment, look at the Crusades!
.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Hmmm, were Christian Crusaders rabid dogs?

Right on cue.

But the Crusades, the Crusades!

Don't look at the horrific slaughter being perpetrated by modern day Jihadists at this very moment, look at the Crusades!

And it should be noted that liberals are using the Muslim version of history on the Crusades. Do liberals have any idea about the atrocities and horrors that were committed by the Muslim armies whom the Crusaders fought to expel from Jerusalem and surrounding areas?

Shall we talk about the wholesale slaughter that Muslim forces committed in certain areas? How about the whole armies of assassins that the Muslims used? No, you won't get this from Hollywood movies on the Crusades (such as Kingdom of Heaven, an admittedly entertaining propaganda film that portrayed the Christians as the bad guys and the Muslims as the really good and honorable guys).

No, the Crusaders were by no means always exemplars of Christian virtue, though some were noble and honorable. But liberals seem to have no clue why thousands of Christians marched off to the Middle East and put their lives at risk in the process, and they also seem to have no clue about the true nature of the Muslim generals and armies whom the Christians battled.

I suggest liberals read Robert Spencer's book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades).

 

[Mac1958]

Hmmm, were Christian Crusaders rabid dogs?

Right on cue.

But the Crusades, the Crusades!

Don't look at the horrific slaughter being perpetrated by modern day Jihadists at this very moment, look at the Crusades!

And it should be noted that liberals are using the Muslim version of history on the Crusades. Do liberals have any idea about the atrocities and horrors that were committed by the Muslim armies whom the Crusaders went to expel from Jerusalem and surrounding areas?

Shall we talk about the wholesale slaughter that Muslim forces committed in certain areas? How about the whole armies of assassins that the Muslims used?

No, the Crusaders were by no means exemplars of Christian virtue, though some were. But liberals seem to have no clue why thousands of Christians marched off to the Middle East and put their lives at risk in the process.

I suggest liberals read Robert Spencer's book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades).

Oh, it doesn't matter.

They just want to deflect a bit for the PC-Protected religion, even if only for one moment.
.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Hmmm, were Christian Crusaders rabid dogs?

Right on cue.

But the Crusades, the Crusades!

Don't look at the horrific slaughter being perpetrated by modern day Jihadists at this very moment, look at the Crusades!

And it should be noted that liberals are using the Muslim version of history on the Crusades. Do liberals have any idea about the atrocities and horrors that were committed by the Muslim armies whom the Crusaders went to expel from Jerusalem and surrounding areas?

Shall we talk about the wholesale slaughter that Muslim forces committed in certain areas? How about the whole armies of assassins that the Muslims used?

No, the Crusaders were by no means exemplars of Christian virtue, though some were. But liberals seem to have no clue why thousands of Christians marched off to the Middle East and put their lives at risk in the process.

I suggest liberals read Robert Spencer's book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades).

Oh, it doesn't matter.

They just want to deflect a bit for the PC-Protected religion, even if only for one moment.

I would bet some good some good money that some liberals base their view of the Crusades on the 2005 movie Kingdom of Heaven, starring Orlando Bloom. Unfortunately, that movie is mostly abject propaganda and myth:

Creation Worldview Ministries: Kingdom of Heaven - Hollywood's Crusade Against History