Rachel "The Velvet Hammer" Mitchell convincing moderates there's no evidence of assault

tinydancer

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2010
51,845
12,821
I just read that Bob Corker is behind Kavanaugh now, and just heard that Joe Manchin is going to go for Kavanaugh unless someone can come up with some FREAKING EVIDENCE that this assault or others took place.

“While both individuals provided compelling testimony, nothing that has been presented corroborates the allegation,” he said in his statement.

Corker announces support for Kavanaugh
 
I just read that Bob Corker is behind Kavanaugh now, and just heard that Joe Manchin is going to go for Kavanaugh unless someone can come up with some FREAKING EVIDENCE that this assault or others took place.

“While both individuals provided compelling testimony, nothing that has been presented corroborates the allegation,” he said in his statement.

Corker announces support for Kavanaugh
"You just heard"...where did you hear all this? :71:
 
I just read that Bob Corker is behind Kavanaugh now, and just heard that Joe Manchin is going to go for Kavanaugh unless someone can come up with some FREAKING EVIDENCE that this assault or others took place.

“While both individuals provided compelling testimony, nothing that has been presented corroborates the allegation,” he said in his statement.

Corker announces support for Kavanaugh
"You just heard"...where did you hear all this? :71:
Try reading the article he linked to, you fucking moron.
 
Last edited:
I just read that Bob Corker is behind Kavanaugh now, and just heard that Joe Manchin is going to go for Kavanaugh unless someone can come up with some FREAKING EVIDENCE that this assault or others took place.

“While both individuals provided compelling testimony, nothing that has been presented corroborates the allegation,” he said in his statement.

Corker announces support for Kavanaugh
"You just heard"...where did you hear all this? :71:

Listening to WOWO tonight.It was on the news.
 
I just read that Bob Corker is behind Kavanaugh now, and just heard that Joe Manchin is going to go for Kavanaugh unless someone can come up with some FREAKING EVIDENCE that this assault or others took place.

“While both individuals provided compelling testimony, nothing that has been presented corroborates the allegation,” he said in his statement.

Corker announces support for Kavanaugh
"You just heard"...where did you hear all this? :71:
Try reading he article he linked to, you fucking moron.

Bodecea is not known for his ability to read....or to reason or communicate for that matter.
 
I just read that Bob Corker is behind Kavanaugh now, and just heard that Joe Manchin is going to go for Kavanaugh unless someone can come up with some FREAKING EVIDENCE that this assault or others took place.

“While both individuals provided compelling testimony, nothing that has been presented corroborates the allegation,” he said in his statement.

Corker announces support for Kavanaugh
Republicans cut her short because she was asking Kavanaugh tough questions.
Corker and Manchin were already decided.
 
I just read that Bob Corker is behind Kavanaugh now, and just heard that Joe Manchin is going to go for Kavanaugh unless someone can come up with some FREAKING EVIDENCE that this assault or others took place.

“While both individuals provided compelling testimony, nothing that has been presented corroborates the allegation,” he said in his statement.

Corker announces support for Kavanaugh
Republicans cut her short because she was asking Kavanaugh tough questions.
Corker and Manchin were already decided.

Bullshit. Her role was to handle Ford.
 
Mega Update:

The sex crimes prosecutor tasked with questioning Christine Blasey Ford during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh told Republican senators on Thursday that Ford’s claims and the lack of corroborative evidence were not strong enough to take the case to a courtroom.

Arizona prosecutor Rachel Mitchell spoke at a late-night Thursday meeting with the Republican caucus, where she briefed all 51 GOP members, according to The Washington Post. Based on the evidence presented during the hearing, Mitchell reportedly said that she would not have prosecuted Kavanaugh. (RELATED: Kavanaugh Breaks Down While Talking About His Dad)

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” a source told Fox News. In fact, Mitchell reportedly said she would not even pursue a search warrant.

The prosecutor’s guidance may be especially important for Republican senators who have yet to make a decision on how to vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court

Rachel Mitchell Makes Professional Conclusion On Kavanaugh Prosecution
 
Mega Update:

The sex crimes prosecutor tasked with questioning Christine Blasey Ford during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh told Republican senators on Thursday that Ford’s claims and the lack of corroborative evidence were not strong enough to take the case to a courtroom.

Arizona prosecutor Rachel Mitchell spoke at a late-night Thursday meeting with the Republican caucus, where she briefed all 51 GOP members, according to The Washington Post. Based on the evidence presented during the hearing, Mitchell reportedly said that she would not have prosecuted Kavanaugh. (RELATED: Kavanaugh Breaks Down While Talking About His Dad)

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” a source told Fox News. In fact, Mitchell reportedly said she would not even pursue a search warrant.

The prosecutor’s guidance may be especially important for Republican senators who have yet to make a decision on how to vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court

Rachel Mitchell Makes Professional Conclusion On Kavanaugh Prosecution
As if we didn't already know that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top