Rand Paul on Ferguson...I agree with him 100%

[Judicial review]

Blacks need to be put in cages and when they become educated they can be released. Like the apes.

Ah: a liberal showing their true colours!!!

Greg

Yeah..... That dude is not a liberal. Sorry to burst your bubble

If he's a liberal then his stance is understandable. If not then he's just an idiot. Not that much difference either way.

Greg

You know racists can be republicans, right? I don't think you know just how big this issue is. My remark was racist and sarcastic with no sympathy for the black community. What have they done as a race to deserve status other than being human with basic human rights? Nothing would be the correct answer. I know there are educated blacks that have a record of accomplishments, bUT they are a dime a dozen or a rare breed. They have no one to blame but themselves. They and the government dependents come 2016 are in for a wake up call. It's called get educated or work. Welfare reform.

I have some proposals on how to really help get them access to get educated with no money up front and student loan reform . I also have job solutions. But basic education is where it all starts.

I have no sympathy for idlers either and to see you state that sarcasm was a part of the comment is also a negative; sarcasm as wit is an oxymoron!! But to the issue. The "dime a dozen" comment is frankly ridiculous. How does one measure "value?" wrt human beings. The only way is: have they made the most of the options open to them. Most people do within a certain comfort zone and that includes Blacks. That there is a large group, but by no means all, who have been locked out of start up jobs by past labour Union and Demokkkrat policies is well known. That they have been victims of appalling Demokkkrat prejudice is also well known. But for that large strata of them to lie down and take the Welfare cargo Cultist Demokkkrat spin is galling. here, we call them "mugs".

The solutions: you say you have some. I would probably tend to agree with most of them. But old dependencies die hard.

Greg

A real human with responsibilities to his family will "create" options for not just him, but for his family also. No one ever said working a min wage job and buying a few bus tickets to get the hell out of the ghetto was easy, but you do what's necessary. All you need to do is look at the poverty rate a mung African Americans and you'll know they aren't doing that. They aren't creating options but rather bitching at everybody else but themselves. Take no responsibility or they just don't care. Forgive me if I'm not sympathetic to them or really angry at libs. I'm angry at the black community for letting the left control them and not taking any responsibility for themselves.

They need to hear that they can have options and see what they could have. Did you know working at McDonald's you can afford a decent apartment for your family in a community full of options and possibilities.

This blaming bullshit needs to stop. Buck up and create options and a better life. You as a human being have responsibility s.

 

[Judicial review]

naturalgas

You know racists can be republicans, right?

I would be disgusted if that were the case. By all means: the Welfare Policies of DemoKKKrats are a ready target, as is the choices many of the scummy (non-racially specific I might add) in resorting to crime. Also the "trendy" drug taking of the "Richnfamous" is also a suitable target but no one MAKES a person a criminal or forces them to be drug fvcked morons who commit crimes to get their next fix or ego boost. That is all their own doing.
But the WHY is the question....and the usual reason is that they lack self-respect. Welfare does that when it is a substitute for gainful employment. Now for those who are genuinely needy then fair enough; charity is after all the hallmark of a civilised society. But when Welfare is a tool of economic suppression of a group or when it is an easy substitute for work then frankly there is something really wrong!! WRT Ferguson: who are the real victims??

Donors Give Ferguson Bakery 90 000 To Repair Vandalized Shop The Daily Caller

This Lady for one. Her story, if true, shows a lot of guts. I'd put her above most of the "Society Dames" that consider themselves superior any day!!

Greg

Human beings are racist. It's not a lib or republican thing.

 

[gtopa1]

Ah: a liberal showing their true colours!!!

Greg

Yeah..... That dude is not a liberal. Sorry to burst your bubble

If he's a liberal then his stance is understandable. If not then he's just an idiot. Not that much difference either way.

Greg

You know racists can be republicans, right? I don't think you know just how big this issue is. My remark was racist and sarcastic with no sympathy for the black community. What have they done as a race to deserve status other than being human with basic human rights? Nothing would be the correct answer. I know there are educated blacks that have a record of accomplishments, bUT they are a dime a dozen or a rare breed. They have no one to blame but themselves. They and the government dependents come 2016 are in for a wake up call. It's called get educated or work. Welfare reform.

I have some proposals on how to really help get them access to get educated with no money up front and student loan reform . I also have job solutions. But basic education is where it all starts.

I have no sympathy for idlers either and to see you state that sarcasm was a part of the comment is also a negative; sarcasm as wit is an oxymoron!! But to the issue. The "dime a dozen" comment is frankly ridiculous. How does one measure "value?" wrt human beings. The only way is: have they made the most of the options open to them. Most people do within a certain comfort zone and that includes Blacks. That there is a large group, but by no means all, who have been locked out of start up jobs by past labour Union and Demokkkrat policies is well known. That they have been victims of appalling Demokkkrat prejudice is also well known. But for that large strata of them to lie down and take the Welfare cargo Cultist Demokkkrat spin is galling. here, we call them "mugs".

The solutions: you say you have some. I would probably tend to agree with most of them. But old dependencies die hard.

Greg

A real human with responsibilities to his family will "create" options for not just him, but for his family also. No one ever said working a min wage job and buying a few bus tickets to get the hell out of the ghetto was easy, but you do what's necessary. All you need to do is look at the poverty rate a mung African Americans and you'll know they aren't doing that. They aren't creating options but rather bitching at everybody else but themselves. Take no responsibility or they just don't care. Forgive me if I'm not sympathetic to them or really angry at libs. I'm angry at the black community for letting the left control them and not taking any responsibility for themselves.

They need to hear that they can have options and see what they could have. Did you know working at McDonald's you can afford a decent apartment for your family in a community full of options and possibilities.

This blaming bullshit needs to stop. Buck up and create options and a better life. You as a human being have responsibility s.

 

[gtopa1]

A "real"human?? I'm the son of a refugee, old bean. I know about creating a living and opportunities for one's family. ffs we did it. And no it was not easy. The harder dad worked the more barriers others put in his way, but he was an exceptional bloke. he started his own business and ...well, the rest as they say is history. He died having achieved a lot, but not "top shelf" as we say here, and frankly he was content with seven kids, a farm, several properties and a lot of respect from those who knew him. It was the latter he valued most.
That lass in Ferguson tells me that there are many who are indeed trying.

They need to hear that they can have options and see what they could have.

Exactly. And the Dems are telling them they can only have a free lunch!!

Did you know working at McDonald's you can afford a decent apartment for your family in a community full of options and possibilities.

Yes. Several of my children have done so over the years, as has one of my brothers. They learnt a lot more than the pay they got.

This blaming bullshit needs to stop.

Of course it does. Don't expect the Dems to say so though!!

You as a human being have responsibility s

Me?? lol. My dear sir I was on a State Executive for a Conservative party when I was 27. I have also chaired a Progress Assn. and have been accepted as an Elder in an Aboriginal Community. I'm bloody hash-tag #RESPONSIBILITY!!!! Keeping people in Human Zoos otherwise known as the ghettos is inhumane!!! But make no mistake; unless the people break out then the Fergusons will become just another pit stop in the decline of America!!

Greg

 

[Roadrunner]

Rand Paul is correct and he can attract blacks, Latinos and moderates to the Republican Party

The chip don't fall far from the block.

I'd NEVER vote for that smirking son of a bitch, just because of who his dad is.

 

[gtopa1]

naturalgas

You know racists can be republicans, right?

I would be disgusted if that were the case. By all means: the Welfare Policies of DemoKKKrats are a ready target, as is the choices many of the scummy (non-racially specific I might add) in resorting to crime. Also the "trendy" drug taking of the "Richnfamous" is also a suitable target but no one MAKES a person a criminal or forces them to be drug fvcked morons who commit crimes to get their next fix or ego boost. That is all their own doing.
But the WHY is the question....and the usual reason is that they lack self-respect. Welfare does that when it is a substitute for gainful employment. Now for those who are genuinely needy then fair enough; charity is after all the hallmark of a civilised society. But when Welfare is a tool of economic suppression of a group or when it is an easy substitute for work then frankly there is something really wrong!! WRT Ferguson: who are the real victims??

Donors Give Ferguson Bakery 90 000 To Repair Vandalized Shop The Daily Caller

This Lady for one. Her story, if true, shows a lot of guts. I'd put her above most of the "Society Dames" that consider themselves superior any day!!

Greg

Human beings are racist. It's not a lib or republican thing.

Rubbish!! People cannot hide behind a Party of course; each person is responsible for their own attitudes. But the KKKrats have a long history of Black suppression; their policies now are even worse than when they had a lynch mob on every corner!! At least that was honest racism; liberalism keeps blacks poor and angry!!

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

Rand Paul is correct and he can attract blacks, Latinos and moderates to the Republican Party

The chip don't fall far from the block.

I'd NEVER vote for that smirking son of a bitch, just because of who his dad is.

That is hashtag DUMB!!

Greg

 

[Roadrunner]

I am so OVER this debate about Nature and Nurture. There is no doubt that the entrapment of groups in Welfare Poverty creates an environment where the idle get into lawlessness. But what is the real history of that? Labour Unions for one which had laws in place against "cheap labour"......meaning no poor blacks need apply. So to the welfare trap......why on earth would one take up a job which paid less than welfare and was unreliable. One can whine all one wants about the evil law enforcers, but the true sources of the disparities of opportunity are liberal repressive policies. Of course they are well intentioned; using other people's money always is. But the OUTCOME is devastating to self respect. Without that, dear reader, the slide into criminal conduct is a short cone away.

But make NO MISTAKE: being trapped in the welfare cycle is no excuse for criminal conduct; it simply makes the options of criminality more appealing. The responsibility for criminal actions remain solely with the perpetrator!!

Greg

You can't do the crime if you don't have the time.

If we put all able bodied welfare and foodstamp recipients into jobs cleaning up the litter in this country, repairing roads, working in the National Forests, and in general, learning work skills instead of welfare skills, crime would go down.

People would have pride at having earned their keep, and, be too damned tired from working to have time to fuck up.

 

[Roadrunner]

When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

This goes the heart of the question about "racial superiority"... since nobody can choose their genetics or their parents...

Before I begin, it has been well documented that the overwhelming majority of those Native Americans you cited died out due to weak immune systems; unable to handle the pox that European settlers brought with them. Now that your first misrepresentation has been formally trashed allow me to deconstruct the rest.




The conflict principle transcends cultures, races, and ethnicities. Therefore, the question is not whether whites were evil in dominating others, ALL civilizations utilized their technology to dominate others, but whether others would have done the same to whites if the tables were turned. The answer to that question is a resounding YES. Thus, the fallacy of your thinking is clear.

Whites dominated the world not because of racial superiority, but cultural superiority that led to technological superiority. They indeed had an incentive to produce such a culture. They were never but a moment away from war with other white cultures. Hence they raced each other to colonize Africa, Asia, and the Americas, so that they would remain economically competitive against each other and therefore militarily dominant against a war with other white cultures.

The fact that others who were taken over by whites could not band together to flush out invaders is telling. Whites used warring Native American tribes against each other just as they used warring African tribes against each other to their advantage. Generally, whites would go to the losing tribe and offer technologically advanced weapons to them in return for land, treaties, and alliances. Now we must again ask ourselves if this would have happened to whites if the situation was reversed for Native Americans, Africans, or Asians. Indeed, they held the same practices in their smaller and technologically less advanced societies. The answer must be yes.

With that said it is also telling that Japan was never colonized. They did not resist white imperialism because they knew they could not. Instead they took the strengths that white culture produced, adopted them, and quickly became a world power. Indeed, this is how civilizations advance. They took what works from the working model and applied it to themselves. For the past 300 years whites have held the working formula. It has nothing to do with racial superiority, but cultural and technological superiority. So Japan became stronger due to white imperialism, as did every other country (colonized or not) with the technology that with introduced into their cultures.

The wars created by whites were so violent simply because whites ruled the world due to cultural and technological superiority. You cannot tell me that the violence that whites created would not have happened if the shoe was on the other foot. Your argument is a whole bunch of unfounded leftist gobbly gook designed on stoking hatred toward the working model of mainstream Western Civilization so as to replace it with the failed western ideology of Marxism which has led to the destruction of untold millions of domestic populations in their various countries. With that said you aren't really against western ways of thought, you just don't like the current Western Model. Indeed, you are attempting to discredit one civilization with/for an ideology produced by that same civilization. You don't really care about other peoples, you simply want them to be pressed under a different western ideology.

Well there you go. I have answered your question and more. Your argument has been deconstructed, discredited, and proved null and void. Have a nice day. Now enjoy this Japanese orchestra playing Beethoven. You're welcome Japan. In Japan no dispute about No. 1 holiday song - CBS News

Whites got here and found "the Native Americans" EATING EACH OTHER!!

All I need to know.

 

[Roadrunner]

Rand Paul is correct and he can attract blacks, Latinos and moderates to the Republican Party

The chip don't fall far from the block.

I'd NEVER vote for that smirking son of a bitch, just because of who his dad is.

That is hashtag DUMB!!

Greg

Why is it dumb?

I know a lot of people that cannot stand Rand Paul and would never vote for him, and, a lot of it has to do with his asshole dad.

If Rand Paul is the nominee of the Republican Party, any dem will trounce him.

 

[Judicial review]

naturalgas

You know racists can be republicans, right?

I would be disgusted if that were the case. By all means: the Welfare Policies of DemoKKKrats are a ready target, as is the choices many of the scummy (non-racially specific I might add) in resorting to crime. Also the "trendy" drug taking of the "Richnfamous" is also a suitable target but no one MAKES a person a criminal or forces them to be drug fvcked morons who commit crimes to get their next fix or ego boost. That is all their own doing.
But the WHY is the question....and the usual reason is that they lack self-respect. Welfare does that when it is a substitute for gainful employment. Now for those who are genuinely needy then fair enough; charity is after all the hallmark of a civilised society. But when Welfare is a tool of economic suppression of a group or when it is an easy substitute for work then frankly there is something really wrong!! WRT Ferguson: who are the real victims??

Donors Give Ferguson Bakery 90 000 To Repair Vandalized Shop The Daily Caller

This Lady for one. Her story, if true, shows a lot of guts. I'd put her above most of the "Society Dames" that consider themselves superior any day!!

Greg

Human beings are racist. It's not a lib or republican thing.

Rubbish!! People cannot hide behind a Party of course; each person is responsible for their own attitudes. But the KKKrats have a long history of Black suppression; their policies now are even worse than when they had a lynch mob on every corner!! At least that was honest racism; liberalism keeps blacks poor and angry!!

Greg

You don't read. Quit blaming libs. Blame the people responsible. The blacks.

 

[gtopa1]

Rand Paul is correct and he can attract blacks, Latinos and moderates to the Republican Party

The chip don't fall far from the block.

I'd NEVER vote for that smirking son of a bitch, just because of who his dad is.

That is hashtag DUMB!!

Greg

Why is it dumb?

I know a lot of people that cannot stand Rand Paul and would never vote for him, and, a lot of it has to do with his asshole dad.

If Rand Paul is the nominee of the Republican Party, any dem will trounce him.

You haven't mentioned ONE policy of his with which you agree or disagree. When you do I will consider the post; until then...just dumb.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

naturalgas

You know racists can be republicans, right?

I would be disgusted if that were the case. By all means: the Welfare Policies of DemoKKKrats are a ready target, as is the choices many of the scummy (non-racially specific I might add) in resorting to crime. Also the "trendy" drug taking of the "Richnfamous" is also a suitable target but no one MAKES a person a criminal or forces them to be drug fvcked morons who commit crimes to get their next fix or ego boost. That is all their own doing.
But the WHY is the question....and the usual reason is that they lack self-respect. Welfare does that when it is a substitute for gainful employment. Now for those who are genuinely needy then fair enough; charity is after all the hallmark of a civilised society. But when Welfare is a tool of economic suppression of a group or when it is an easy substitute for work then frankly there is something really wrong!! WRT Ferguson: who are the real victims??

Donors Give Ferguson Bakery 90 000 To Repair Vandalized Shop The Daily Caller

This Lady for one. Her story, if true, shows a lot of guts. I'd put her above most of the "Society Dames" that consider themselves superior any day!!

Greg

Human beings are racist. It's not a lib or republican thing.

Rubbish!! People cannot hide behind a Party of course; each person is responsible for their own attitudes. But the KKKrats have a long history of Black suppression; their policies now are even worse than when they had a lynch mob on every corner!! At least that was honest racism; liberalism keeps blacks poor and angry!!

Greg

You don't read. Quit blaming libs. Blame the people responsible. The blacks.

I blame the people responsible; those who turn to crime rather than work their way out of penury. I also look at the policies that have led to making that choice seem like a "fair" option. Both disgust me. "Blacks" don't. Stats show that most "Black" crime is enacted upon other Blacks. I say the crims have to be removed from civil society. Why is that a problem for you??

Greg

 

[Roadrunner]

Rand Paul is correct and he can attract blacks, Latinos and moderates to the Republican Party

The chip don't fall far from the block.

I'd NEVER vote for that smirking son of a bitch, just because of who his dad is.

That is hashtag DUMB!!

Greg

Why is it dumb?

I know a lot of people that cannot stand Rand Paul and would never vote for him, and, a lot of it has to do with his asshole dad.

If Rand Paul is the nominee of the Republican Party, any dem will trounce him.

You haven't mentioned ONE policy of his with which you agree or disagree. When you do I will consider the post; until then...just dumb.

Greg

Well fuck yourself then.

I don't like him because he is a smirking creep, like his whackjob father.

I disagree with all of his policies, from his unrealistic foreign policy, which depending on which side of his mouth he speaking out of, can be described as isolationist or interventionist to his so called fiscal policies.

I guess he believe in isolationist intervention, which is a new one on me.


His whack job financial ideas too, not going to work in this world.

He is really not worthy of study, except to see why so many dems want the idiot to run.

 

[gtopa1]

Rand Paul is correct and he can attract blacks, Latinos and moderates to the Republican Party

The chip don't fall far from the block.

I'd NEVER vote for that smirking son of a bitch, just because of who his dad is.

That is hashtag DUMB!!

Greg

Why is it dumb?

I know a lot of people that cannot stand Rand Paul and would never vote for him, and, a lot of it has to do with his asshole dad.

If Rand Paul is the nominee of the Republican Party, any dem will trounce him.

You haven't mentioned ONE policy of his with which you agree or disagree. When you do I will consider the post; until then...just dumb.

Greg

Well fuck yourself then.

I don't like him because he is a smirking creep, like his whackjob father.

I disagree with all of his policies, from his unrealistic foreign policy, which depending on which side of his mouth he speaking out of, can be described as isolationist or interventionist to his so called fiscal policies.

I guess he believe in isolationist intervention, which is a new one on me.


His whack job financial ideas too, not going to work in this world.

He is really not worthy of study, except to see why so many dems want the idiot to run.

 

[gtopa1]

The chip don't fall far from the block.

I'd NEVER vote for that smirking son of a bitch, just because of who his dad is.

That is hashtag DUMB!!

Greg

Why is it dumb?

I know a lot of people that cannot stand Rand Paul and would never vote for him, and, a lot of it has to do with his asshole dad.

If Rand Paul is the nominee of the Republican Party, any dem will trounce him.

You haven't mentioned ONE policy of his with which you agree or disagree. When you do I will consider the post; until then...just dumb.

Greg

Well fuck yourself then.

I don't like him because he is a smirking creep, like his whackjob father.

I disagree with all of his policies, from his unrealistic foreign policy, which depending on which side of his mouth he speaking out of, can be described as isolationist or interventionist to his so called fiscal policies.

I guess he believe in isolationist intervention, which is a new one on me.


His whack job financial ideas too, not going to work in this world.

He is really not worthy of study, except to see why so many dems want the idiot to run.

A great way to start off your critique of some policies; go sit on your secateurs and TWIST!! When you give a reasonable answer to which policies you don't think will work then I will consider them.

Greg

 

[Judicial review]

naturalgas

You know racists can be republicans, right?

I would be disgusted if that were the case. By all means: the Welfare Policies of DemoKKKrats are a ready target, as is the choices many of the scummy (non-racially specific I might add) in resorting to crime. Also the "trendy" drug taking of the "Richnfamous" is also a suitable target but no one MAKES a person a criminal or forces them to be drug fvcked morons who commit crimes to get their next fix or ego boost. That is all their own doing.
But the WHY is the question....and the usual reason is that they lack self-respect. Welfare does that when it is a substitute for gainful employment. Now for those who are genuinely needy then fair enough; charity is after all the hallmark of a civilised society. But when Welfare is a tool of economic suppression of a group or when it is an easy substitute for work then frankly there is something really wrong!! WRT Ferguson: who are the real victims??

Donors Give Ferguson Bakery 90 000 To Repair Vandalized Shop The Daily Caller

This Lady for one. Her story, if true, shows a lot of guts. I'd put her above most of the "Society Dames" that consider themselves superior any day!!

Greg

Human beings are racist. It's not a lib or republican thing.

Rubbish!! People cannot hide behind a Party of course; each person is responsible for their own attitudes. But the KKKrats have a long history of Black suppression; their policies now are even worse than when they had a lynch mob on every corner!! At least that was honest racism; liberalism keeps blacks poor and angry!!

Greg

You don't read. Quit blaming libs. Blame the people responsible. The blacks.

I blame the people responsible; those who turn to crime rather than work their way out of penury. I also look at the policies that have led to making that choice seem like a "fair" option. Both disgust me. "Blacks" don't. Stats show that most "Black" crime is enacted upon other Blacks. I say the crims have to be removed from civil society. Why is that a problem for you??

Greg

It's not a fair option and blacks know it. You're so naive. They choose to be lazy because it's naturally easier. We all can look at policy all we want but it will get to the point where we force them to work through a welfare reform bill. They will no longer be eligible for benefits unless they do x y z .

 

[Carla_Danger]

Sort of like your complete intolerance while calling for tolerance while hating the right and then agreeing with a rightwinger and making a thread about agreeing you disagree with a agreement.

Sounds about right...or left

Well, I see one Rightie put on his thinking cap. LOL!

 

[Judicial review]

That is hashtag DUMB!!

Greg

Why is it dumb?

I know a lot of people that cannot stand Rand Paul and would never vote for him, and, a lot of it has to do with his asshole dad.

If Rand Paul is the nominee of the Republican Party, any dem will trounce him.

You haven't mentioned ONE policy of his with which you agree or disagree. When you do I will consider the post; until then...just dumb.

Greg

Well fuck yourself then.

I don't like him because he is a smirking creep, like his whackjob father.

I disagree with all of his policies, from his unrealistic foreign policy, which depending on which side of his mouth he speaking out of, can be described as isolationist or interventionist to his so called fiscal policies.

I guess he believe in isolationist intervention, which is a new one on me.


His whack job financial ideas too, not going to work in this world.

He is really not worthy of study, except to see why so many dems want the idiot to run.

A great way to start off your critique of some policies; go sit on your secateurs and TWIST!! When you give a reasonable answer to which policies you don't think will work then I will consider them.

Greg

I cant understand a word youre saying.

 

[Publius1787]

When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

This goes the heart of the question about "racial superiority"... since nobody can choose their genetics or their parents...

Before I begin, it has been well documented that the overwhelming majority of those Native Americans you cited died out due to weak immune systems; unable to handle the pox that European settlers brought with them. Now that your first misrepresentation has been formally trashed allow me to deconstruct the rest.




The conflict principle transcends cultures, races, and ethnicities. Therefore, the question is not whether whites were evil in dominating others, ALL civilizations utilized their technology to dominate others, but whether others would have done the same to whites if the tables were turned. The answer to that question is a resounding YES. Thus, the fallacy of your thinking is clear.

Whites dominated the world not because of racial superiority, but cultural superiority that led to technological superiority. They indeed had an incentive to produce such a culture. They were never but a moment away from war with other white cultures. Hence they raced each other to colonize Africa, Asia, and the Americas, so that they would remain economically competitive against each other and therefore militarily dominant against a war with other white cultures.

The fact that others who were taken over by whites could not band together to flush out invaders is telling. Whites used warring Native American tribes against each other just as they used warring African tribes against each other to their advantage. Generally, whites would go to the losing tribe and offer technologically advanced weapons to them in return for land, treaties, and alliances. Now we must again ask ourselves if this would have happened to whites if the situation was reversed for Native Americans, Africans, or Asians. Indeed, they held the same practices in their smaller and technologically less advanced societies. The answer must be yes.

With that said it is also telling that Japan was never colonized. They did not resist white imperialism because they knew they could not. Instead they took the strengths that white culture produced, adopted them, and quickly became a world power. Indeed, this is how civilizations advance. They took what works from the working model and applied it to themselves. For the past 300 years whites have held the working formula. It has nothing to do with racial superiority, but cultural and technological superiority. So Japan became stronger due to white imperialism, as did every other country (colonized or not) with the technology that with introduced into their cultures.

The wars created by whites were so violent simply because whites ruled the world due to cultural and technological superiority. You cannot tell me that the violence that whites created would not have happened if the shoe was on the other foot. Your argument is a whole bunch of unfounded leftist gobbly gook designed on stoking hatred toward the working model of mainstream Western Civilization so as to replace it with the failed western ideology of Marxism which has led to the destruction of untold millions of domestic populations in their various countries. With that said you aren't really against western ways of thought, you just don't like the current Western Model. Indeed, you are attempting to discredit one civilization with/for an ideology produced by that same civilization. You don't really care about other peoples, you simply want them to be pressed under a different western ideology.

Well there you go. I have answered your question and more. Your argument has been deconstructed, discredited, and proved null and void. Have a nice day. Now enjoy this Japanese orchestra playing Beethoven. You're welcome Japan. In Japan no dispute about No. 1 holiday song - CBS News

wake up Dorothy you're having that dream again. The one where you believe you're important and your biased ramblings are fact!

Still no reply from Daws I see. Should I assume he's given up?