Rand Paul Unleashes LIVE On Senate Floor – Names Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella 5 Times

There is nothing illegal about naming this individual (it is only IG who is bound by this), and it subjects him to nothing more than the scorn of the few people on the Right who are paying attention. He is in no danger of losing his job, or of physical violence. If he chooses to cash in and acts quickly he can make a quick half-Mil in a book deal. He probably doesn't even have to write the book himself, as Washington is filled with ghost-writers who will do it for him, at reasonable cost.

So what's the big deal?
 
Other than trying to get the guy killed, what possible purpose does it serve?
 
A very wrong thing to do.
Why?

Because it was unnecessary, potentially illegal, put's his life and his family in jeopardy. Everything in the report was independently verified. The only reason to do this is to ruin a man's life for doing the right thing and reporting on something even his superiors agreed was credible.

You guys are just nuts.

Think of precedents - if we can't protect whistle blowers reporting on unethical conduct from our government - who will take the risk of reporting?

What is so weird is it's typically the RIGHT that takes the position of checks and balance on the government. Things have certainly changed.
And you're a friggin moron just like your assholes in congress like shitforbrains Schiff.
 
A very wrong thing to do.
Why?

Because it was unnecessary, potentially illegal, put's his life and his family in jeopardy. Everything in the report was independently verified. The only reason to do this is to ruin a man's life for doing the right thing and reporting on something even his superiors agreed was credible.

You guys are just nuts.

Think of precedents - if we can't protect whistle blowers reporting on unethical conduct from our government - who will take the risk of reporting?

What is so weird is it's typically the RIGHT that takes the position of checks and balance on the government. Things have certainly changed.
Whistle blowers that are politically aligned with a party is of suspicious nature. And there were attacks on people, people in public places, and their property and going in their property during the last couple years of Obama's Presidency and the first couple years of Trump's. By Antifa and BLM or people who supported them. More and more weapons are being purchased. If someone is in a restaurant and a group comes in threatening them, do they have the right to pull out a handgun and start shooting?
 
Eric put his own ass in peril, nobody else did it to him nor for him.
Snowflakes always demand shielding from the repercussions of their illicit acts.
 
Eric put his own ass in peril, nobody else did it to him nor for him.
Snowflakes always demand shielding from the repercussions of their illicit acts.

So reporting on the President puts your ass in peril?
 
Other than trying to get the guy killed, what possible purpose does it serve?
To call out your phoney assholes in congress and their ILLEGAL, unconstitutional acts you dumbass, why the hell else.

Again again, serves no other purpose than to try to get the whistleblower killed
Once again you demonstrate you didn't watch the video.

I love how you are always proud to show you post in ignorance.
 
A very wrong thing to do.
Why?

Because it was unnecessary, potentially illegal, put's his life and his family in jeopardy. Everything in the report was independently verified. The only reason to do this is to ruin a man's life for doing the right thing and reporting on something even his superiors agreed was credible.

You guys are just nuts.

Think of precedents - if we can't protect whistle blowers reporting on unethical conduct from our government - who will take the risk of reporting?

What is so weird is it's typically the RIGHT that takes the position of checks and balance on the government. Things have certainly changed.
Whistle blowers that are politically aligned with a party is of suspicious nature. And there were attacks on people, people in public places, and their property and going in their property during the last couple years of Obama's Presidency and the first couple years of Trump's. By Antifa and BLM or people who supported them. More and more weapons are being purchased. If someone is in a restaurant and a group comes in threatening them, do they have the right to pull out a handgun and start shooting?


There is no indication that this whistle blower is partisan in his report. As has been repeatedly pointed out - the report was found CREDIBLE by multiple investigators. Further - testimony and records supported each of the points. So whether or not the whistle blower had ulterior motives (which frankly seems to be assigned to ANY one who dares raise objection to what Trump does) is irrelevant - the facts stand and support the report independent of who wrote it. That should and did spark an investigation.

What's happening now is nothing short of a vendetta against him, and it's disturbing.

So suddenly, now, death threats and violence against government whistle blowers is acceptable? There is a reason we have laws and rules in place protecting them and that reason has nothing to do with this one person, but all the persons going on from here.

You want to be able to hold our government accountable? Well left and right, from media to whistle blowers, you are chopping down the trees.
 
Other than trying to get the guy killed, what possible purpose does it serve?
To call out your phoney assholes in congress and their ILLEGAL, unconstitutional acts you dumbass, why the hell else.

Again again, serves no other purpose than to try to get the whistleblower killed
Once again you demonstrate you didn't watch the video.

I love how you are always proud to show you post in ignorance.
If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong
 
Eric put his own ass in peril, nobody else did it to him nor for him.
Snowflakes always demand shielding from the repercussions of their illicit acts.


So....let get this straight.

Whistle blowers, who credibly report on Trump, legally, are fair targets for retribution?

That's a special kind of crazy right there.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2020-2-4_15-6-6.jpeg
    upload_2020-2-4_15-6-6.jpeg
    6.3 KB · Views: 28
Other than trying to get the guy killed, what possible purpose does it serve?

For crying out loud, you people were bitching for five years because McConnell stated he wanted to see DumBama as a one-term President. Here you have a guy trying to undermine the Trump presidency, and no problem at all. Why? Because he's a Republican.

I could only imagine if we did anything like this to Obama. There would have been riots in the street.
 
Trumps war on civil servants continues unabated, from the State Department to the Intelligence Agencies.

Idiocracy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top