DBA
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2015
- 13,185
- 11,894
Actually, Dubinsky’s opening statement said they much more evidence needs to be gathered before he could even suggest there were corruption, fraud or wrong doing.
I guess your media censored that information from you because your description clearly does not line up with his statement.
I was told that circumstantial evidence couldn’t convict anyone when it was Trump, but I agree with you it could be used to convict someone.
The circumstantial evidence gathered to date is proof beyond a reasonable doubt only to the right wing hacks who truly just want to believe.
To less partisan people, it doesn’t come anywhere near that point, as the hearing demonstrated.
The point of the inquiry is to address potential corruption. I don’t expect you to read it, but the reasons Turley refers to are most certainly enough to raise an inquiry. No reasonable person would think otherwise. Turley basically said there isn’t enough to convict(yet), but that is kind of the point of an inquiry.…to investigate where smoke is originating.
Ten Reasons Why the Biden Impeachment Inquiry is Justified