Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,449
- 73,671
*on financial disclosures under penalty of lawI want you to pay taxes based on the highest amount you ever said yours is worth.
You keep forgetting that part.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
*on financial disclosures under penalty of lawI want you to pay taxes based on the highest amount you ever said yours is worth.
When did anyone claim Trump told the banks what his property is worth? The banks never ask the seller what they think it's worth. That makes this case even more idiotic.
Where did the gain come from, asshole?
Do you understand the difference between $18 million and $1.5 billion?What locality taxes real estate and the same rate as market value? Typical demafasict either never owned real estate or wants to target their political rival to be treated differently
Since I don't see signatures, I had no idea the forum now only shows a small top region of a signature. So I made the image smaller so it appears again. Thanks for bringing that to my attention, rambtard. Now everyone here viewing signatures can see it again.
I’m ok on whatever the city appraise the real estate arDo you understand the difference between $18 million and $1.5 billion?
My house market value is probably $300K or so here in Kansas. The tax valuation is about 20% under that.
If we take that same 20% from tRump's estimate of $1.3 billion he only needs to pay taxes on $1.04 billion.
I'm ok with that, how about you?
mar a ladro is listed as a private residence.I’m ok on whatever the city appraise the real estate ar
I’m ok with it being very different then what an owner of the property does
There is also a difference between a value of the company and the real estate, which the congressman apparenly doesn’t grasp
I don't think it is. Legally, nobody except employees of Mar a Lago can live there.mar a ladro is listed as a private residence.
For fraud to have occured, someone has to have been damaged. Whether Trump gained is irrelevant.Again, fucking moron, a gain need not be obtained. It's still fraud just for attempting it repeatedly.
It actually does. If the bank didn’t do it’s due diligence and made the loan then they are liable not Trump.Of course it's the bank's responsibility. That doesn't absolve Trump from trying.
Lol, evidently you do not. HilariousI know how loans work. I know banks dont just take the person who's seeking a loan word for it on the value of the asset they are using for collateral.
My bank didn't ask me for any "financial statement." They just asked for my income, assets and debts I had.Lol, evidently you do not. Hilarious![]()
Sure. Odd the banks weren’t complaining and the DA didn’t file a criminal indictment though isn’t it. Also odd it wasn’t until after Trump ran for President that everyone noticed all the fraud. I know he’s only been in the NY real estate business for a couple years but still.
I'm not sure, but the info I gave you would lead me to believe it is considered a commercial property, mixed use at best.Ah, I thought it was.
Wow!People are just stupid. Led around by the Commee in the MSM.
Property Tax assement is far different from true value in many US STATES: example below.
Assessed Value = Full Cash Value multiplied by Assessment Ratio (varies per Legal Class of property per ARS Title 42, Chapter 15, Article 1. For example: 10% for class 3, residential, 20% for 1 & 2P, Commercial (adjustable by year) and 16% for class 2R vacant land)
Loons won't even use LW commee google to avoid making fools of themselves. I alread knew it. Now I will go read some more of the dead - thread.
My bank didn't ask me for any "financial statement." They just asked for my income, assets and debts I had.
Sure man. You believe what you want to believe. It’s all just a coincidenceIt matters not if banks complained or not. Again, fraud the intent to deceive for gain. It's the intent to gain, not the realization to gain. The NY law requires multiple attempts, which the prosecution provided such evidence.
For fraud to have occured, someone has to have been damaged. Whether Trump gained is irrelevant.