Billy000
Democratic Socialist
- Nov 10, 2011
- 32,074
- 12,821
- Thread starter
- #21
Some economists argue that six months of data isn't enough to draw conclusions.
"It's too early to tell," said Stan Veuger, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. "These states are very different along all kinds of dimensions."
For example, the number of jobs in North Dakota which didn't raise the minimum wage and has prospered because of a boom in oil and gas drilling rose 2.8% since the start of this year, the most of any state.
But job growth in the aging industrial state of Ohio was just 0.7% after its minimum rose to $7.95 from $7.85. The federal minimum wage is $7.25.
But what is telling about this article is that it shows raising the wage does not COST jobs. Whether or not raising the wage produces job growth is what is debateable.
Raising minimum wages effects current jobs as well as potential job growth.
With respect to current jobs, higher minimum wages effects employers.
Higher minimum wages also effects potential employers.
Raise employment and increased wages will follow suit.
Raise wages and jobs will suffer.
Jobs won't suffer because turnover will be reduced and motivation will increase with millions of people being lifted out of poverty. Plus, the increase in demand from higher wages will eventually create jobs.