Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

[kaz]

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

So you don't understand the difference between porn and modeling?

I understand that this isn't just an average modeling job.
View attachment 103225

But you say it's porn?

It's not porn to me unless there is some sex involved.

You know that and I know that. Liberals don't unfortunately.

If it was the wife of a Democrat BULLSHIT would be rolling on the ground with his eyes in the back of his head asking you what the matter is with you that you even give a shit what someone's wife does

 

[ChrisL]

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

I actually agree with you. Same with the left and Clinton

The difference being that Bills screw up was a private situation between two consenting adults, and was never intended to be pubic knowledge. Trump's women's sexual explorations were designed to be publicly viewed as widely as possible, by as many people as possible. I guess that would make them exhibitionists too, right?

I was talking about dumping their beliefs..
And that post is just risiculous.

BULLSHIT is indeed a ridiculous little man, and I mean little in multiple ways ...

BULLDOG is just bodecea with a bigger clit

Yuck! That is something none of us want to think about this early in the day!

 

[aris2chat]

No photo op, no hunting trip, trumps name removed from charity.

 

[BULLDOG]

Titties don't bother me. I love them. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the right with their long history of holier than thou rhetoric. Exactly when did the right change from claiming to be a deeply moral party to being proud to have the first first lady who publicly posed for nude lesbian scenes?

Yet you can't identify any of these Republicans you believe you nailed. You can't show any quotes from any of the current Republican leadership. You can't explain all the hotties on Fox. You're BULLSHIT for a reason, Jerry Falwell. Women aren't going to put on long, baggy close just to make your prudish ass happy

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

I actually agree with you. Same with the left and Clinton

The difference being that Bills screw up was a private situation between two consenting adults, and was never intended to be pubic knowledge. Trump's women's sexual explorations were designed to be publicly viewed as widely as possible, by as many people as possible. I guess that would make them exhibitionists too, right?

Really? Kathleen Wiley was "a private situation between two consenting adults." You're a liar

Obviously you are aware of the mythology the right built around Ms Wiley. Perhaps you should review what really happened with her. She was proven to have lied, and tried to get a friend to lie to support her claims. All in all, nothing more than another fake accusation.

Kathleen Willey - Wikipedia

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling her boyfriend she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.[13] On the evening of March 19, 1998, Julie Hiatt Steele, a friend of Willey, released an affidavit, accusing the former White House aide of asking her to lie to corroborate Ms. Willey's account of being sexually groped by President Clinton in the Oval Office.[14] An attempt by Kenneth Starr to prosecute Steele for making false statements and obstructing justice ended in a mistrial and Starr declined to seek a retrial after Steele sought an investigation against the former Independent Counsel for prosecutorial misconduct.[15]

 

[BULLDOG]

Titties don't bother me. I love them. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the right with their long history of holier than thou rhetoric. Exactly when did the right change from claiming to be a deeply moral party to being proud to have the first first lady who publicly posed for nude lesbian scenes?

Yet you can't identify any of these Republicans you believe you nailed. You can't show any quotes from any of the current Republican leadership. You can't explain all the hotties on Fox. You're BULLSHIT for a reason, Jerry Falwell. Women aren't going to put on long, baggy close just to make your prudish ass happy

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

So you don't understand the difference between porn and modeling?

I understand that this isn't just an average modeling job.
View attachment 103225

It's tough being a horn dog and an extremist Christian zealot at the same time, huh? What difference does Melania make to you that you have such raging butt hurt over her? It's pathetic, BULLSHIT. Grow up

That's funny. I think I need to keep pointing out what quality woman the right thinks should be our first lady. It's not my fault that it goes against everything the right has claimed to believe in the past.

 

[kaz]

Yet you can't identify any of these Republicans you believe you nailed. You can't show any quotes from any of the current Republican leadership. You can't explain all the hotties on Fox. You're BULLSHIT for a reason, Jerry Falwell. Women aren't going to put on long, baggy close just to make your prudish ass happy

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

I actually agree with you. Same with the left and Clinton

The difference being that Bills screw up was a private situation between two consenting adults, and was never intended to be pubic knowledge. Trump's women's sexual explorations were designed to be publicly viewed as widely as possible, by as many people as possible. I guess that would make them exhibitionists too, right?

Really? Kathleen Wiley was "a private situation between two consenting adults." You're a liar

Obviously you are aware of the mythology the right built around Ms Wiley. Perhaps you should review what really happened with her. She was proven to have lied, and tried to get a friend to lie to support her claims. All in all, nothing more than another fake accusation.

Kathleen Willey - Wikipedia

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling her boyfriend she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.[13] On the evening of March 19, 1998, Julie Hiatt Steele, a friend of Willey, released an affidavit, accusing the former White House aide of asking her to lie to corroborate Ms. Willey's account of being sexually groped by President Clinton in the Oval Office.[14] An attempt by Kenneth Starr to prosecute Steele for making false statements and obstructing justice ended in a mistrial and Starr declined to seek a retrial after Steele sought an investigation against the former Independent Counsel for prosecutorial misconduct.[15]

Of course she lied, she accused a Democrat. Democrats are virginal, pure as the driven snow. We know she lied right there. Everyone lied. Slick never in fact had sex out of matrimony, he never got a Monica from Monica, he would never hear of it, it was all a vast right wing conspiracy.

Do you have any ability for original thought or do you just plug DNC talking points directly into your brain?

 

[BULLDOG]

Yet you can't identify any of these Republicans you believe you nailed. You can't show any quotes from any of the current Republican leadership. You can't explain all the hotties on Fox. You're BULLSHIT for a reason, Jerry Falwell. Women aren't going to put on long, baggy close just to make your prudish ass happy

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

I actually agree with you. Same with the left and Clinton

The difference being that Bills screw up was a private situation between two consenting adults, and was never intended to be pubic knowledge. Trump's women's sexual explorations were designed to be publicly viewed as widely as possible, by as many people as possible. I guess that would make them exhibitionists too, right?

I was talking about dumping their beliefs..
And that post is just risiculous.

BULLSHIT is indeed a ridiculous little man, and I mean little in multiple ways ...

You promised you wouldn't tell. After all, it was really cold that night.

 

[kaz]

Yet you can't identify any of these Republicans you believe you nailed. You can't show any quotes from any of the current Republican leadership. You can't explain all the hotties on Fox. You're BULLSHIT for a reason, Jerry Falwell. Women aren't going to put on long, baggy close just to make your prudish ass happy

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

So you don't understand the difference between porn and modeling?

I understand that this isn't just an average modeling job.
View attachment 103225

It's tough being a horn dog and an extremist Christian zealot at the same time, huh? What difference does Melania make to you that you have such raging butt hurt over her? It's pathetic, BULLSHIT. Grow up

That's funny. I think I need to keep pointing out what quality woman the right thinks should be our first lady. It's not my fault that it goes against everything the right has claimed to believe in the past.

Yet of all this "the right has claimed to believe in the past," you can't name anyone or provide any quotes. Amazing how something that rampant is so unsupportable! You're BULLSHIT for a reason!

Let's discuss hypocrisy. You're the party of taxing the rich. So?

1) Where is your outrage at Soros and Sharpton for not paying taxes they owe?

2) Where is your outrage at Buffett and Gates for hiring lawyers to evade billions in taxes?

3) Where is your outrage at tax cheats like Rangle, Geither, Daschle, McCaskill, ...?

Trump didn't run on family values, yet you hold him a hypocrite for not having family values. Yet you ignore flagrant leftist hypocrisy. You can't even attack Republicans for hypocrisy without being a ... wait for it ... HYPOCRITE!

 

[BULLDOG]

So you don't understand the difference between porn and modeling?

I understand that this isn't just an average modeling job.
View attachment 103225

But you say it's porn?

It's not porn to me unless there is some sex involved.

You know that and I know that. Liberals don't unfortunately.

If it was the wife of a Democrat BULLSHIT would be rolling on the ground with his eyes in the back of his head asking you what the matter is with you that you even give a shit what someone's wife does

What data are you using to determine that? After all, there has never been a Democratic first lady who participated in a totally nude lesbian porn scene with the intention of distributing the pictures on the internet. Trump's is the first.

 

[BULLDOG]

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

I actually agree with you. Same with the left and Clinton

The difference being that Bills screw up was a private situation between two consenting adults, and was never intended to be pubic knowledge. Trump's women's sexual explorations were designed to be publicly viewed as widely as possible, by as many people as possible. I guess that would make them exhibitionists too, right?

Really? Kathleen Wiley was "a private situation between two consenting adults." You're a liar

Obviously you are aware of the mythology the right built around Ms Wiley. Perhaps you should review what really happened with her. She was proven to have lied, and tried to get a friend to lie to support her claims. All in all, nothing more than another fake accusation.

Kathleen Willey - Wikipedia

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling her boyfriend she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.[13] On the evening of March 19, 1998, Julie Hiatt Steele, a friend of Willey, released an affidavit, accusing the former White House aide of asking her to lie to corroborate Ms. Willey's account of being sexually groped by President Clinton in the Oval Office.[14] An attempt by Kenneth Starr to prosecute Steele for making false statements and obstructing justice ended in a mistrial and Starr declined to seek a retrial after Steele sought an investigation against the former Independent Counsel for prosecutorial misconduct.[15]

Of course she lied, she accused a Democrat. Democrats are virginal, pure as the driven snow. We know she lied right there. Everyone lied. Slick never in fact had sex out of matrimony, he never got a Monica from Monica, he would never hear of it, it was all a vast right wing conspiracy.

Do you have any ability for original thought or do you just plug DNC talking points directly into your brain?

I never said Monica didn't play his meat harp for him. Just that it was a private consensual act between adults. Wiley was nothing but another false accusation, no matter what the tight wing myth claims.

 

[BULLDOG]

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

So you don't understand the difference between porn and modeling?

I understand that this isn't just an average modeling job.
View attachment 103225

It's tough being a horn dog and an extremist Christian zealot at the same time, huh? What difference does Melania make to you that you have such raging butt hurt over her? It's pathetic, BULLSHIT. Grow up

That's funny. I think I need to keep pointing out what quality woman the right thinks should be our first lady. It's not my fault that it goes against everything the right has claimed to believe in the past.

Yet of all this "the right has claimed to believe in the past," you can't name anyone or provide any quotes. Amazing how something that rampant is so unsupportable! You're BULLSHIT for a reason!

Let's discuss hypocrisy. You're the party of taxing the rich. So?

1) Where is your outrage at Soros and Sharpton for not paying taxes they owe?

2) Where is your outrage at Buffett and Gates for hiring lawyers to evade billions in taxes?

3) Where is your outrage at tax cheats like Rangle, Geither, Daschle, McCaskill, ...?

Trump didn't run on family values, yet you hold him a hypocrite for not having family values. Yet you ignore flagrant leftist hypocrisy. You can't even attack Republicans for hypocrisy without being a ... wait for it ... HYPOCRITE!

I never said Trump was a hypocrite based on his family values. In fact, he and his family's sexually open history is unchanged since he first discussed his infant daughter's tits on a national show, or said it was alright to call his daughter a nice piece of ass, or he pressured his 2nd wife to pose nude in Playboy. I'm saying the right are hypocrites for supporting him.

 

[kaz]

I actually agree with you. Same with the left and Clinton

The difference being that Bills screw up was a private situation between two consenting adults, and was never intended to be pubic knowledge. Trump's women's sexual explorations were designed to be publicly viewed as widely as possible, by as many people as possible. I guess that would make them exhibitionists too, right?

Really? Kathleen Wiley was "a private situation between two consenting adults." You're a liar

Obviously you are aware of the mythology the right built around Ms Wiley. Perhaps you should review what really happened with her. She was proven to have lied, and tried to get a friend to lie to support her claims. All in all, nothing more than another fake accusation.

Kathleen Willey - Wikipedia

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling her boyfriend she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.[13] On the evening of March 19, 1998, Julie Hiatt Steele, a friend of Willey, released an affidavit, accusing the former White House aide of asking her to lie to corroborate Ms. Willey's account of being sexually groped by President Clinton in the Oval Office.[14] An attempt by Kenneth Starr to prosecute Steele for making false statements and obstructing justice ended in a mistrial and Starr declined to seek a retrial after Steele sought an investigation against the former Independent Counsel for prosecutorial misconduct.[15]

Of course she lied, she accused a Democrat. Democrats are virginal, pure as the driven snow. We know she lied right there. Everyone lied. Slick never in fact had sex out of matrimony, he never got a Monica from Monica, he would never hear of it, it was all a vast right wing conspiracy.

Do you have any ability for original thought or do you just plug DNC talking points directly into your brain?

I never said Monica didn't play his meat harp for him. Just that it was a private consensual act between adults. Wiley was nothing but another false accusation, no matter what the tight wing myth claims.

That's just a lie. Wiley, Jones and Broderick were all non-consentual

 

[kaz]

I understand that this isn't just an average modeling job.
View attachment 103225

But you say it's porn?

It's not porn to me unless there is some sex involved.

You know that and I know that. Liberals don't unfortunately.

If it was the wife of a Democrat BULLSHIT would be rolling on the ground with his eyes in the back of his head asking you what the matter is with you that you even give a shit what someone's wife does

What data are you using to determine that? After all, there has never been a Democratic first lady who participated in a totally nude lesbian porn scene with the intention of distributing the pictures on the internet. Trump's is the first.

And no Republicans said they want a first lady who participated in a "totally nude lesbian porn scene." They're just not giving a shit.

And again, you can't show quotes from anyone that Trump ran a family values campaign or anyone who supported him for family values.

And your hypocrisy attack is totally hypocrisy as you don't criticize tax evading or even tax cheat Democrats who are the ones who want high taxes.

Dude, you're a loser

 

[BULLDOG]

The difference being that Bills screw up was a private situation between two consenting adults, and was never intended to be pubic knowledge. Trump's women's sexual explorations were designed to be publicly viewed as widely as possible, by as many people as possible. I guess that would make them exhibitionists too, right?

Really? Kathleen Wiley was "a private situation between two consenting adults." You're a liar

Obviously you are aware of the mythology the right built around Ms Wiley. Perhaps you should review what really happened with her. She was proven to have lied, and tried to get a friend to lie to support her claims. All in all, nothing more than another fake accusation.

Kathleen Willey - Wikipedia

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling her boyfriend she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.[13] On the evening of March 19, 1998, Julie Hiatt Steele, a friend of Willey, released an affidavit, accusing the former White House aide of asking her to lie to corroborate Ms. Willey's account of being sexually groped by President Clinton in the Oval Office.[14] An attempt by Kenneth Starr to prosecute Steele for making false statements and obstructing justice ended in a mistrial and Starr declined to seek a retrial after Steele sought an investigation against the former Independent Counsel for prosecutorial misconduct.[15]

Of course she lied, she accused a Democrat. Democrats are virginal, pure as the driven snow. We know she lied right there. Everyone lied. Slick never in fact had sex out of matrimony, he never got a Monica from Monica, he would never hear of it, it was all a vast right wing conspiracy.

Do you have any ability for original thought or do you just plug DNC talking points directly into your brain?

I never said Monica didn't play his meat harp for him. Just that it was a private consensual act between adults. Wiley was nothing but another false accusation, no matter what the tight wing myth claims.

That's just a lie. Wiley, Jones and Broderick were all non-consentual

Willey was a completely false accusation. None of the three were able to prove their claims were anything but a right wing attempt to build on the Monica Story.

 

[BULLDOG]

The difference being that Bills screw up was a private situation between two consenting adults, and was never intended to be pubic knowledge. Trump's women's sexual explorations were designed to be publicly viewed as widely as possible, by as many people as possible. I guess that would make them exhibitionists too, right?

Really? Kathleen Wiley was "a private situation between two consenting adults." You're a liar

Obviously you are aware of the mythology the right built around Ms Wiley. Perhaps you should review what really happened with her. She was proven to have lied, and tried to get a friend to lie to support her claims. All in all, nothing more than another fake accusation.

Kathleen Willey - Wikipedia

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling her boyfriend she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.[13] On the evening of March 19, 1998, Julie Hiatt Steele, a friend of Willey, released an affidavit, accusing the former White House aide of asking her to lie to corroborate Ms. Willey's account of being sexually groped by President Clinton in the Oval Office.[14] An attempt by Kenneth Starr to prosecute Steele for making false statements and obstructing justice ended in a mistrial and Starr declined to seek a retrial after Steele sought an investigation against the former Independent Counsel for prosecutorial misconduct.[15]

Of course she lied, she accused a Democrat. Democrats are virginal, pure as the driven snow. We know she lied right there. Everyone lied. Slick never in fact had sex out of matrimony, he never got a Monica from Monica, he would never hear of it, it was all a vast right wing conspiracy.

Do you have any ability for original thought or do you just plug DNC talking points directly into your brain?

I never said Monica didn't play his meat harp for him. Just that it was a private consensual act between adults. Wiley was nothing but another false accusation, no matter what the tight wing myth claims.

That's just a lie. Wiley, Jones and Broderick were all non-consentual

Yes, that is the claim. Care to present the proof?

 

[kaz]

Really? Kathleen Wiley was "a private situation between two consenting adults." You're a liar

Obviously you are aware of the mythology the right built around Ms Wiley. Perhaps you should review what really happened with her. She was proven to have lied, and tried to get a friend to lie to support her claims. All in all, nothing more than another fake accusation.

Kathleen Willey - Wikipedia

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling her boyfriend she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.[13] On the evening of March 19, 1998, Julie Hiatt Steele, a friend of Willey, released an affidavit, accusing the former White House aide of asking her to lie to corroborate Ms. Willey's account of being sexually groped by President Clinton in the Oval Office.[14] An attempt by Kenneth Starr to prosecute Steele for making false statements and obstructing justice ended in a mistrial and Starr declined to seek a retrial after Steele sought an investigation against the former Independent Counsel for prosecutorial misconduct.[15]

Of course she lied, she accused a Democrat. Democrats are virginal, pure as the driven snow. We know she lied right there. Everyone lied. Slick never in fact had sex out of matrimony, he never got a Monica from Monica, he would never hear of it, it was all a vast right wing conspiracy.

Do you have any ability for original thought or do you just plug DNC talking points directly into your brain?

I never said Monica didn't play his meat harp for him. Just that it was a private consensual act between adults. Wiley was nothing but another false accusation, no matter what the tight wing myth claims.

That's just a lie. Wiley, Jones and Broderick were all non-consentual

Willey was a completely false accusation. None of the three were able to prove their claims were anything but a right wing attempt to build on the Monica Story.

Your proof that it was a lie is that no one else witnessed it. Yet you readily believe accusations against Trump no one else witnessed. Why would a long time Democrat activist do that?

Yet you, Mr. Hypocrisy, believe any and all accusations against Trump. You're completely shallow and obvious, grow up.

And again, evidence Trump ran on "family values?" You have none. That anyone vote for him for family values? Again, you have zero. That you're OK with big tax and spend Democrats evading and cheating on taxes? Yep, not a word from you

 

[BULLDOG]

But you say it's porn?

It's not porn to me unless there is some sex involved.

You know that and I know that. Liberals don't unfortunately.

If it was the wife of a Democrat BULLSHIT would be rolling on the ground with his eyes in the back of his head asking you what the matter is with you that you even give a shit what someone's wife does

What data are you using to determine that? After all, there has never been a Democratic first lady who participated in a totally nude lesbian porn scene with the intention of distributing the pictures on the internet. Trump's is the first.

And no Republicans said they want a first lady who participated in a "totally nude lesbian porn scene." They're just not giving a shit.

And again, you can't show quotes from anyone that Trump ran a family values campaign or anyone who supported him for family values.

And your hypocrisy attack is totally hypocrisy as you don't criticize tax evading or even tax cheat Democrats who are the ones who want high taxes.

Dude, you're a loser

You're slowly catching on. Keep trying. I'm sure you can put it together.
1.Correct. The right is just not giving a shit. That is the complete extent of my point. After decades of claiming what they called family values as one of their most deeply held moral guidelines,They are willing to just throw that out as no longer useful. We both know the uproar that would happen if a Democratic first lady had the same history. Pure Hypocrisy.
2. I already said Trump didn't run on morality of any kind. He's just not equipped to do that.
3.We can discuss the tax breaks for the rich if you want to, but you seem to be upset about my pointing out how often Trump's women's nude bodies are waved around like an attention getting flag

 

[kaz]

Really? Kathleen Wiley was "a private situation between two consenting adults." You're a liar

Obviously you are aware of the mythology the right built around Ms Wiley. Perhaps you should review what really happened with her. She was proven to have lied, and tried to get a friend to lie to support her claims. All in all, nothing more than another fake accusation.

Kathleen Willey - Wikipedia

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling her boyfriend she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.[13] On the evening of March 19, 1998, Julie Hiatt Steele, a friend of Willey, released an affidavit, accusing the former White House aide of asking her to lie to corroborate Ms. Willey's account of being sexually groped by President Clinton in the Oval Office.[14] An attempt by Kenneth Starr to prosecute Steele for making false statements and obstructing justice ended in a mistrial and Starr declined to seek a retrial after Steele sought an investigation against the former Independent Counsel for prosecutorial misconduct.[15]

Of course she lied, she accused a Democrat. Democrats are virginal, pure as the driven snow. We know she lied right there. Everyone lied. Slick never in fact had sex out of matrimony, he never got a Monica from Monica, he would never hear of it, it was all a vast right wing conspiracy.

Do you have any ability for original thought or do you just plug DNC talking points directly into your brain?

I never said Monica didn't play his meat harp for him. Just that it was a private consensual act between adults. Wiley was nothing but another false accusation, no matter what the tight wing myth claims.

That's just a lie. Wiley, Jones and Broderick were all non-consentual

Yes, that is the claim. Care to present the proof?

You mean like you proved your assertion Trump assaulted women? Oh wait, you didn't. Why would I do what you won't?

Back to other questions you haven't answered.

Where did Trump run on "family values?"

What Republicans supported him for "family values?"

Where are your threads attacking Democrats for evading and cheating on their taxes since you're the high tax party?

 

[kaz]

It's not porn to me unless there is some sex involved.

You know that and I know that. Liberals don't unfortunately.

If it was the wife of a Democrat BULLSHIT would be rolling on the ground with his eyes in the back of his head asking you what the matter is with you that you even give a shit what someone's wife does

What data are you using to determine that? After all, there has never been a Democratic first lady who participated in a totally nude lesbian porn scene with the intention of distributing the pictures on the internet. Trump's is the first.

And no Republicans said they want a first lady who participated in a "totally nude lesbian porn scene." They're just not giving a shit.

And again, you can't show quotes from anyone that Trump ran a family values campaign or anyone who supported him for family values.

And your hypocrisy attack is totally hypocrisy as you don't criticize tax evading or even tax cheat Democrats who are the ones who want high taxes.

Dude, you're a loser

You're slowly catching on. Keep trying. I'm sure you can put it together.
1.Correct. The right is just not giving a shit. That is the complete extent of my point. After decades of claiming what they called family values as one of their most deeply held moral guidelines,They are willing to just throw that out as no longer useful. We both know the uproar that would happen if a Democratic first lady had the same history. Pure Hypocrisy.
2. I already said Trump didn't run on morality of any kind. He's just not equipped to do that.
3.We can discuss the tax breaks for the rich if you want to, but you seem to be upset about my pointing out how often Trump's women's nude bodies are waved around like an attention getting flag

OK, if you're going to get all emotional again, let's pick this up later when you get a grip.

In the meantime, you can also start to collect names of who all these mainstream Republicans are who are running on "family values" and all these mainstream Republicans voting for them for that

Also, you haven't answered your concern on unions having a "death grip" on the Democrat party

 

[BULLDOG]

You know that and I know that. Liberals don't unfortunately.

If it was the wife of a Democrat BULLSHIT would be rolling on the ground with his eyes in the back of his head asking you what the matter is with you that you even give a shit what someone's wife does

What data are you using to determine that? After all, there has never been a Democratic first lady who participated in a totally nude lesbian porn scene with the intention of distributing the pictures on the internet. Trump's is the first.

And no Republicans said they want a first lady who participated in a "totally nude lesbian porn scene." They're just not giving a shit.

And again, you can't show quotes from anyone that Trump ran a family values campaign or anyone who supported him for family values.

And your hypocrisy attack is totally hypocrisy as you don't criticize tax evading or even tax cheat Democrats who are the ones who want high taxes.

Dude, you're a loser

You're slowly catching on. Keep trying. I'm sure you can put it together.
1.Correct. The right is just not giving a shit. That is the complete extent of my point. After decades of claiming what they called family values as one of their most deeply held moral guidelines,They are willing to just throw that out as no longer useful. We both know the uproar that would happen if a Democratic first lady had the same history. Pure Hypocrisy.
2. I already said Trump didn't run on morality of any kind. He's just not equipped to do that.
3.We can discuss the tax breaks for the rich if you want to, but you seem to be upset about my pointing out how often Trump's women's nude bodies are waved around like an attention getting flag

OK, if you're going to get all emotional again, let's pick this up later when you get a grip.

In the meantime, you can also start to collect names of who all these mainstream Republicans are who are running on "family values" and all these mainstream Republicans voting for them for that

Also, you haven't answered your concern on unions having a "death grip" on the Democrat party

I'm not emotional at all. You keep trying to misdirect or change the subject.