Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

[Ted Frazier]

What "crime" did Comey say she was guilty of?

His testimony proved that she was guilty of violating national security laws and lying under oath about it.

Comey "said" she was guilty of being careless. He wanted to stay alive.

Stop making shit up and spreading NaziCon conspiracy theories, fake news, and lies. Just stop it.

the testimony is available, look it up and read it.

Where are the indictments? Why isn't Hillary on trial - or in jail?

because we have two sets of laws in this country. One for us and one for the political elites.

Do think that's OK?

Are you saying there's a different set of laws for Christie and Trump?

 

[Redfish]

His testimony proved that she was guilty of violating national security laws and lying under oath about it.

Comey "said" she was guilty of being careless. He wanted to stay alive.

Stop making shit up and spreading NaziCon conspiracy theories, fake news, and lies. Just stop it.

the testimony is available, look it up and read it.

Where are the indictments? Why isn't Hillary on trial - or in jail?

because we have two sets of laws in this country. One for us and one for the political elites.

Do think that's OK?

Are you saying there's a different set of laws for Christie and Trump?

what crime did they both commit?

 

[JakeStarkey]

What was "corrupt" about Hillary? What has ever been "proven"? What has Hillary ever been "convicted" of? Please provide "credible" proof that can be verified as factual.

convicted of? nothing--------------------yet. Guilty of? a review of Comey's testimony should clear that up for you. But you really don't care do you? your head is up Hillary's fat ass 100%.

What "crime" did Comey say she was guilty of?

His testimony proved that she was guilty of violating national security laws and lying under oath about it.

Comey "said" she was guilty of being careless. He wanted to stay alive.

Stop making shit up and spreading NaziCon conspiracy theories, fake news, and lies. Just stop it.

More NaziLib lies from Tonto, the domesticated redskin who drinks white whine spritzers, loves tapestry and lives in a loft

Lakhota just scalped kaz.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

More: Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

Tell the Rubes its OK...Dear leader in Orange is no longer in the "swamp drain" Mode LOL
Gingrich Says Trump's No Longer Interested In 'Drain The Swamp'

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

His testimony proved that she was guilty of violating national security laws and lying under oath about it.

Comey "said" she was guilty of being careless. He wanted to stay alive.

Stop making shit up and spreading NaziCon conspiracy theories, fake news, and lies. Just stop it.

the testimony is available, look it up and read it.

Where are the indictments? Why isn't Hillary on trial - or in jail?

because we have two sets of laws in this country. One for us and one for the political elites.

Do think that's OK?

Yes, Comey proved that by violating the FBI's 60-protocol when he committed malfeasance in office and cost Hillary the presidency.

It's awful when the voters are reminded of her incompetence and her corruption.

 

[AntonToo]

New Texas-based group not legally required to disclose its donors

A new Texas nonprofit led by Donald Trump’s grown sons is offering access to the freshly-minted president during inauguration weekend — all in exchange for million-dollar donations to unnamed “conservation” charities, according to interviews and documents reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.

And the donors’ identities may never be known.

Prospective million-dollar donors to the “Opening Day 2017” event — slated for Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, at Washington, D.C.’s Walter E. Washington Convention Center — receive a “private reception and photo opportunity for 16 guests with President Donald J. Trump,” a “multi-day hunting and/or fishing excursion for 4 guests with Donald Trump, Jr. and/or Eric Trump, and team,” as well as tickets to other events and “autographed guitars by an Opening Day 2017 performer.”

Website TMZ.com first published a brochure hyping the happening. The brochure says that “all net proceeds from the Opening Day event will be donated to conservation charities,” but it does not name the charities or detail how net proceeds will be calculated.

Who’s behind the get-together?

More: Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

Wow, talk about pay for play! Why is Trump almost always guilty of whatever he claims about others? He is a master of projection - which not a praiseworthy human trait.

Now you're against selling access? DERP!

But you were always against selling access and therefore don't like any of this shit...you will explicitly state so instead of switching to Clinton bitching in 3...2...1...

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

But youm were always against selling access and therefore don't like any of this shit...right?

Trump could sell access to grabbing their Mamma s pussy and they would still defend him...they are Rubes

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

New Texas-based group not legally required to disclose its donors

A new Texas nonprofit led by Donald Trump’s grown sons is offering access to the freshly-minted president during inauguration weekend — all in exchange for million-dollar donations to unnamed “conservation” charities, according to interviews and documents reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.

And the donors’ identities may never be known.

Prospective million-dollar donors to the “Opening Day 2017” event — slated for Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, at Washington, D.C.’s Walter E. Washington Convention Center — receive a “private reception and photo opportunity for 16 guests with President Donald J. Trump,” a “multi-day hunting and/or fishing excursion for 4 guests with Donald Trump, Jr. and/or Eric Trump, and team,” as well as tickets to other events and “autographed guitars by an Opening Day 2017 performer.”

Website TMZ.com first published a brochure hyping the happening. The brochure says that “all net proceeds from the Opening Day event will be donated to conservation charities,” but it does not name the charities or detail how net proceeds will be calculated.

Who’s behind the get-together?

More: Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

Wow, talk about pay for play! Why is Trump almost always guilty of whatever he claims about others? He is a master of projection - which not a praiseworthy human trait.

Now you're against selling access? DERP!

But you were always against selling access and therefore don't like any of this shit...and will explicit state so instead of Clinton bitching in 3...2....1

I agree, after Clinton is convicted, this shit will finally stop.

 

[AntonToo]

You backed a loser Democrat,

THEREFORE TRUMP CAN DO NO WRONG


...?

 

[AntonToo]

New Texas-based group not legally required to disclose its donors

A new Texas nonprofit led by Donald Trump’s grown sons is offering access to the freshly-minted president during inauguration weekend — all in exchange for million-dollar donations to unnamed “conservation” charities, according to interviews and documents reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.

And the donors’ identities may never be known.

Prospective million-dollar donors to the “Opening Day 2017” event — slated for Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, at Washington, D.C.’s Walter E. Washington Convention Center — receive a “private reception and photo opportunity for 16 guests with President Donald J. Trump,” a “multi-day hunting and/or fishing excursion for 4 guests with Donald Trump, Jr. and/or Eric Trump, and team,” as well as tickets to other events and “autographed guitars by an Opening Day 2017 performer.”

Website TMZ.com first published a brochure hyping the happening. The brochure says that “all net proceeds from the Opening Day event will be donated to conservation charities,” but it does not name the charities or detail how net proceeds will be calculated.

Who’s behind the get-together?

More: Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

Wow, talk about pay for play! Why is Trump almost always guilty of whatever he claims about others? He is a master of projection - which not a praiseworthy human trait.

Now you're against selling access? DERP!

But you were always against selling access and therefore don't like any of this shit...and will explicit state so instead of Clinton bitching in 3...2....1

I agree, after Clinton is convicted, this shit will finally stop.

How does Clinton conviction stop Trump and his family's conflicts of interest?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

New Texas-based group not legally required to disclose its donors

A new Texas nonprofit led by Donald Trump’s grown sons is offering access to the freshly-minted president during inauguration weekend — all in exchange for million-dollar donations to unnamed “conservation” charities, according to interviews and documents reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.

And the donors’ identities may never be known.

Prospective million-dollar donors to the “Opening Day 2017” event — slated for Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, at Washington, D.C.’s Walter E. Washington Convention Center — receive a “private reception and photo opportunity for 16 guests with President Donald J. Trump,” a “multi-day hunting and/or fishing excursion for 4 guests with Donald Trump, Jr. and/or Eric Trump, and team,” as well as tickets to other events and “autographed guitars by an Opening Day 2017 performer.”

Website TMZ.com first published a brochure hyping the happening. The brochure says that “all net proceeds from the Opening Day event will be donated to conservation charities,” but it does not name the charities or detail how net proceeds will be calculated.

Who’s behind the get-together?

More: Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

Wow, talk about pay for play! Why is Trump almost always guilty of whatever he claims about others? He is a master of projection - which not a praiseworthy human trait.

Now you're against selling access? DERP!

But you were always against selling access and therefore don't like any of this shit...and will explicit state so instead of Clinton bitching in 3...2....1

I agree, after Clinton is convicted, this shit will finally stop.

How does Clinton conviction stop Trump and his family's conflicts of interest?

They'll see that it's a bad idea.

 

[AntonToo]

New Texas-based group not legally required to disclose its donors

A new Texas nonprofit led by Donald Trump’s grown sons is offering access to the freshly-minted president during inauguration weekend — all in exchange for million-dollar donations to unnamed “conservation” charities, according to interviews and documents reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.

And the donors’ identities may never be known.

Prospective million-dollar donors to the “Opening Day 2017” event — slated for Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, at Washington, D.C.’s Walter E. Washington Convention Center — receive a “private reception and photo opportunity for 16 guests with President Donald J. Trump,” a “multi-day hunting and/or fishing excursion for 4 guests with Donald Trump, Jr. and/or Eric Trump, and team,” as well as tickets to other events and “autographed guitars by an Opening Day 2017 performer.”

Website TMZ.com first published a brochure hyping the happening. The brochure says that “all net proceeds from the Opening Day event will be donated to conservation charities,” but it does not name the charities or detail how net proceeds will be calculated.

Who’s behind the get-together?

More: Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

Wow, talk about pay for play! Why is Trump almost always guilty of whatever he claims about others? He is a master of projection - which not a praiseworthy human trait.

Now you're against selling access? DERP!

But you were always against selling access and therefore don't like any of this shit...and will explicit state so instead of Clinton bitching in 3...2....1

I agree, after Clinton is convicted, this shit will finally stop.

How does Clinton conviction stop Trump and his family's conflicts of interest?

They'll see that it's a bad idea.

I got a better idea - WHY DON'T WE CONVICT THEM TO SHOW THEM IT IS A BAD IDEA?

Probably would be a much more convincing showing no?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

You backed a loser Democrat,

THEREFORE TRUMP CAN DO NO WRONG


...?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Now you're against selling access? DERP!

But you were always against selling access and therefore don't like any of this shit...and will explicit state so instead of Clinton bitching in 3...2....1

I agree, after Clinton is convicted, this shit will finally stop.

How does Clinton conviction stop Trump and his family's conflicts of interest?

They'll see that it's a bad idea.

I got a better idea - WHY DON'T WE CONVICT THEM TO SHOW THEM IT IS A BAD IDEA?

Probably would be a much more convincing showing no?

WHY DON'T WE CONVICT THEM TO SHOW THEM IT IS A BAD IDEA?

Yup. So will they just convict Hillary? Or Hillary and Bill?

Yes, convicting "the most qualified person to ever run for the Presidency" will be very convincing.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

BULLSHIT is such a prude, no way would he be able to get a blowjob.

The left are so butt hurt, you can't have any discussion without their polluting the thread with this stupid crap

Proudly said by someone who was perfectly happy with false claims of an under aged sex ring run out of some pizza shop.

At this point you're so butt hurt you're just completely making it up. We do know what a sexually stunted prude you are as you keep advocating women covering their bodies because it shocks and offends you to see them. Republicans are far more open and comfortable with their bodies than you are at this point. What happened? You should look up the Democrats of the Sixties, Jerry Fallwell

Titties don't bother me. I love them. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the right with their long history of holier than thou rhetoric. Exactly when did the right change from claiming to be a deeply moral party to being proud to have the first first lady who publicly posed for nude lesbian scenes?

Yet you can't identify any of these Republicans you believe you nailed. You can't show any quotes from any of the current Republican leadership. You can't explain all the hotties on Fox. You're BULLSHIT for a reason, Jerry Falwell. Women aren't going to put on long, baggy close just to make your prudish ass happy

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

So you don't understand the difference between porn and modeling?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

New Texas-based group not legally required to disclose its donors

A new Texas nonprofit led by Donald Trump’s grown sons is offering access to the freshly-minted president during inauguration weekend — all in exchange for million-dollar donations to unnamed “conservation” charities, according to interviews and documents reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.

And the donors’ identities may never be known.

Prospective million-dollar donors to the “Opening Day 2017” event — slated for Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, at Washington, D.C.’s Walter E. Washington Convention Center — receive a “private reception and photo opportunity for 16 guests with President Donald J. Trump,” a “multi-day hunting and/or fishing excursion for 4 guests with Donald Trump, Jr. and/or Eric Trump, and team,” as well as tickets to other events and “autographed guitars by an Opening Day 2017 performer.”

Website TMZ.com first published a brochure hyping the happening. The brochure says that “all net proceeds from the Opening Day event will be donated to conservation charities,” but it does not name the charities or detail how net proceeds will be calculated.

Who’s behind the get-together?

More: Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

Wow, talk about pay for play! Why is Trump almost always guilty of whatever he claims about others? He is a master of projection - which not a praiseworthy human trait.

It was criminal when Hillary sold SecState for cash, not sure what the difference is here

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

New Texas-based group not legally required to disclose its donors

A new Texas nonprofit led by Donald Trump’s grown sons is offering access to the freshly-minted president during inauguration weekend — all in exchange for million-dollar donations to unnamed “conservation” charities, according to interviews and documents reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.

And the donors’ identities may never be known.

Prospective million-dollar donors to the “Opening Day 2017” event — slated for Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, at Washington, D.C.’s Walter E. Washington Convention Center — receive a “private reception and photo opportunity for 16 guests with President Donald J. Trump,” a “multi-day hunting and/or fishing excursion for 4 guests with Donald Trump, Jr. and/or Eric Trump, and team,” as well as tickets to other events and “autographed guitars by an Opening Day 2017 performer.”

Website TMZ.com first published a brochure hyping the happening. The brochure says that “all net proceeds from the Opening Day event will be donated to conservation charities,” but it does not name the charities or detail how net proceeds will be calculated.

Who’s behind the get-together?

More: Report: Trump’s Sons Behind Nonprofit Selling Access To President-Elect For Millions

Wow, talk about pay for play! Why is Trump almost always guilty of whatever he claims about others? He is a master of projection - which not a praiseworthy human trait.

It was criminal when Hillary sold SecState for cash, not sure what the difference is here

The difference is that nobody here sold anything yet, and probably won't. The difference is that the Clinton Crime Foundation is a realty and not just a passing idea somebody else made.

 

[BULLDOG]

the question here is what is the "tit for tat", "quid pro quo".
If they are giving a personal meeting with Trump in exchange for a contribution to a charity, there is nothing wrong with that.

If however, like the Clintons, the money is going into their private accounts in exchange for favorable treatment by the country, that is something quite different.

Money donated to the Clinton Foundation never went into their personal accounts. Whoever told you that lied to you.

 

[BULLDOG]

Proudly said by someone who was perfectly happy with false claims of an under aged sex ring run out of some pizza shop.

At this point you're so butt hurt you're just completely making it up. We do know what a sexually stunted prude you are as you keep advocating women covering their bodies because it shocks and offends you to see them. Republicans are far more open and comfortable with their bodies than you are at this point. What happened? You should look up the Democrats of the Sixties, Jerry Fallwell

Titties don't bother me. I love them. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the right with their long history of holier than thou rhetoric. Exactly when did the right change from claiming to be a deeply moral party to being proud to have the first first lady who publicly posed for nude lesbian scenes?

Yet you can't identify any of these Republicans you believe you nailed. You can't show any quotes from any of the current Republican leadership. You can't explain all the hotties on Fox. You're BULLSHIT for a reason, Jerry Falwell. Women aren't going to put on long, baggy close just to make your prudish ass happy

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

Your argument makes your inability to provide any evidence or quotes all the moronic, doesn't it? For sure the Republicans have had to cater to the socons, but to call it a "death grip on the GOP" is the idiotic hyperbole you constantly engage in ... with the Republicans. All the more why I keep mocking you for your new found extremist Christian self righteousness.

You're applying the furthest socon values to the entire party, you're a moron. Hannity is pretty damned socon and he's never complained about the hotties who work for Fox, quite the contrary.

So just to be clear, your standard is anyone can take the farthest leftist moon bat and you'll back up saying that is the entire Democrat party, right? That's your standard? Or it's only your standard for Republicans. We both know the answer to that question, don't we, hypocrite?

Don't you need to be going? Isn't it time for Wednesday night church? Seven days a week, that's always been your motto

You're just funny. We both know the bible thumpers have been calling the shots for the right for a long time. I am only pointing out the drastic change required for them to support Trump.

 

[BULLDOG]

Proudly said by someone who was perfectly happy with false claims of an under aged sex ring run out of some pizza shop.

At this point you're so butt hurt you're just completely making it up. We do know what a sexually stunted prude you are as you keep advocating women covering their bodies because it shocks and offends you to see them. Republicans are far more open and comfortable with their bodies than you are at this point. What happened? You should look up the Democrats of the Sixties, Jerry Fallwell

Titties don't bother me. I love them. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the right with their long history of holier than thou rhetoric. Exactly when did the right change from claiming to be a deeply moral party to being proud to have the first first lady who publicly posed for nude lesbian scenes?

Yet you can't identify any of these Republicans you believe you nailed. You can't show any quotes from any of the current Republican leadership. You can't explain all the hotties on Fox. You're BULLSHIT for a reason, Jerry Falwell. Women aren't going to put on long, baggy close just to make your prudish ass happy

Are you trying to say the evangelicals haven't had a death grip on the GOP for decades, and the acceptance of Trump isn't a staggering change from the accepted norm? Get real. The sudden dumping of everything the right has claimed to be their deeply held beliefs just to accommodate trump is YUUUUUUGGGGEEEEEEE, and deserves to be pointed out. An internet porn first lady is such a drop from the qualities that have always been expected of a first lady till it would be worth discussion even if the right weren't making such a drastic change.

I actually agree with you. Same with the left and Clinton

The difference being that Bills screw up was a private situation between two consenting adults, and was never intended to be pubic knowledge. Trump's women's sexual explorations were designed to be publicly viewed as widely as possible, by as many people as possible. I guess that would make them exhibitionists too, right?