Republican Blames Tornadoes On Gay Rights

[Howey]

Susanne Atanus, Who Blames Gay Rights For Tornadoes, Wins GOP Nomination For Congress


"God is angry. We are provoking him with abortions and same-sex marriage and civil unions," she said. "Same-sex activity is going to increase AIDS. If it's in our military, it will weaken our military. We need to respect God."

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Well I don't blame it on gay rights, but I do think that Howey had something to do with it.

 

[SteadyMercury]

"Everybody knows that God controls weather," Atanus said.

Heh someone named "Atanus" attacking gays.

 

[auditor0007]

I bet she's a real threat to win that seat too.

 

[Moonglow]

Oh Lawdy! The dinosaurs were having gay sex!!!!!

 

[Howey]

Oh Lawdy! The dinosaurs were having gay sex!!!!!

And Grilled Cheezus walked right by them!

 

[Howey]

I bet she's a real threat to win that seat too.

She won the primary.

 

[Moonglow]

And Grilled Cheezus walked right by them!

With Potato Crisps...

 

[Noomi]

If God really is bringing all that death and destruction just because he doesn't like the way people choose to live their lives, then God must be a very petty person indeed.

 

[Howey]

If God really is bringing all that death and destruction just because he doesn't like the way people choose to live their lives, then God must be a very petty person indeed.

In Defense of The Man, God doesn't hate. Those who hate In His Name are blasphemous and are the ones going to Hell.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It's just as scientific as democrats who blame it on AGW.

 

[Manchester]

It's just as scientific as democrats who blame it on AGW.

It's really not, if you think that then you've clearly not read very much.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It's just as scientific as democrats who blame it on AGW.

It's really not, if you think that then you've clearly not read very much.

It's because I have read a lot. And I live amongst those who profit from AGW propaganda and its ensuing subsidies and grants.

 

[Manchester]

It's just as scientific as democrats who blame it on AGW.

It's really not, if you think that then you've clearly not read very much.

It's because I have read a lot. And I live amongst those who profit from AGW propaganda and its ensuing subsidies and grants.

No, reall you haven't. You've read what told you what you wanted.

If you had read widely on the subject you would know that AGW is in fact an open book that cannot be predicted, a valid theory that cannot be proven that in the very long term will obviously have effects but in no way merits the hysteria that it attracts from the left but also in no way merits the bullheaded stupid refusal to accept that comes from the right.

To claim it as scientific as an act of a vengful god is DEEPLY stupid.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It's really not, if you think that then you've clearly not read very much.

It's because I have read a lot. And I live amongst those who profit from AGW propaganda and its ensuing subsidies and grants.

No, reall you haven't. You've read what told you what you wanted.

If you had read widely on the subject you would know that AGW is in fact an open book that cannot be predicted, a valid theory that cannot be proven that in the very long term will obviously have effects but in no way merits the hysteria that it attracts from the left but also in no way merits the bullheaded stupid refusal to accept that comes from the right.

To claim it as scientific as an act of a vengful god is DEEPLY stupid.

But not as stupid as to consider it a result of AGW. See, religious creationists believe the earth is only a few thousand years old but AGW alarmists thinks it's only 134 years old.

 

[Manchester]

It's because I have read a lot. And I live amongst those who profit from AGW propaganda and its ensuing subsidies and grants.

No, reall you haven't. You've read what told you what you wanted.

If you had read widely on the subject you would know that AGW is in fact an open book that cannot be predicted, a valid theory that cannot be proven that in the very long term will obviously have effects but in no way merits the hysteria that it attracts from the left but also in no way merits the bullheaded stupid refusal to accept that comes from the right.

To claim it as scientific as an act of a vengful god is DEEPLY stupid.

But not as stupid as to consider it a result of AGW. See, religious creationists believe the earth is only a few thousand years old but AGW alarmists thinks it's only 134 years old.

The one thing we know is that in climate science everything is related to everything. The butterfly effect. This being the case I'm sure that AGW will have an effect in a storm happening jest as I'm sure it will have had an effect in a storm not happening at another time. God didn't.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No, reall you haven't. You've read what told you what you wanted.

If you had read widely on the subject you would know that AGW is in fact an open book that cannot be predicted, a valid theory that cannot be proven that in the very long term will obviously have effects but in no way merits the hysteria that it attracts from the left but also in no way merits the bullheaded stupid refusal to accept that comes from the right.

To claim it as scientific as an act of a vengful god is DEEPLY stupid.

But not as stupid as to consider it a result of AGW. See, religious creationists believe the earth is only a few thousand years old but AGW alarmists thinks it's only 134 years old.

The one thing we know is that in climate science everything is related to everything. The butterfly effect. This being the case I'm sure that AGW will have an effect in a storm happening jest as I'm sure it will have had an effect in a storm not happening at another time. God didn't.

That would depend upon whether you're an evangelical or a climangelical. Both require religious faith.

 

[Toro]

Hello, 13th century.

 

[Stephanie]

I'd rather read the national enquire

this stuff is just dumb

 

[WinterBorn]

Now I will laugh at the topic, Howey.