Third Party
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2019
- 7,616
- 634
There was no crime. There was no quid pro quo. There was no impeachable offense. Ergo, there are NO witnesses. Get your head out of the "I hate Trump" zone. It ruins your judgement.House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trumpās impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraineās defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.
The Post reports:
House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Bidenās son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicansā wish list.
Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trumpās demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicansā own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.
(āWitnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump ā that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals ā so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.ā)
All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. Itās remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/