- Thread starter
- #61
Hopefully this isn't the point where you designate me as part of the "anti science" crowd. My point is only that there is clearly an agenda with the greenies... science, as I know it (I'm a simple CPA/Software Designer), should be free of people with agendas as it tends to taint any work done.
Anyway, my objection to this thread is the whole mentality of "we're smarter than you guys".
Oh no, I'm not designating you as anti-science. Far from it. I'm simply saying that you are denying the peer-review process as useful. When it clearly is.
I also object to the premise of this thread.
As a CPA, I am subject to peer review.
The entire point of peer-reviewed research is so that an outside, independent researcher can verify the validity of the data. They are not "like-minded".