Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet, Bachmann has repeatedly stated that wive's must submit to their husbands.
Shit dude.........they've got a wife carry, I wonder if this is the next extreme sport? Think that if Bachmann is elected, she's gonna take a carriage ride as well?
I grew up in a traditional Oneness Pentecostal home. If you know anything about Pentecostals the women are taught to be very submissive to their husbands. My father was not a big influence on my life. My step father was, growing up. I grew up with a mother who believed in submission to her husband. She didn't argue with him much and while they both were very involved in the decision making in the home, if there was a disagreement it was usually my step father that made the final decision on what to do regarding any situation. My grandmother was also Pentecostal (we're from a family of a four generation family of southern Pentecostal and Methodist Holiness preachers and clergy). She taught her daughters to be "obedient" to their husbands. It's an old fashioned way of thinking, but some people still have it.
I feel sorry for Michele Bachmann in this instance that's she's be questioned on this at all. She believes in being submissive to her husband at home, not at work. My mother and my stepfather both worked. My mother didn't call her husband and ask what she should do at the office. Neither will Bachmann. It's simply an attack on people that have traditionalist and fundamentalist faiths. Her choice is to follow her understanding of the scriptures in her home, and quite frankly that's her business.
And yet, Bachmann has repeatedly stated that wive's must submit to their husbands.
Shit dude.........they've got a wife carry, I wonder if this is the next extreme sport? Think that if Bachmann is elected, she's gonna take a carriage ride as well?
I grew up in a traditional Oneness Pentecostal home. If you know anything about Pentecostals the women are taught to be very submissive to their husbands. My father was not a big influence on my life. My step father was, growing up. I grew up with a mother who believed in submission to her husband. She didn't argue with him much and while they both were very involved in the decision making in the home, if there was a disagreement it was usually my step father that made the final decision on what to do regarding any situation. My grandmother was also Pentecostal (we're from a family of a four generation family of southern Pentecostal and Methodist Holiness preachers and clergy). She taught her daughters to be "obedient" to their husbands. It's an old fashioned way of thinking, but some people still have it.
I feel sorry for Michele Bachmann in this instance that's she's be questioned on this at all. She believes in being submissive to her husband at home, not at work. My mother and my stepfather both worked. My mother didn't call her husband and ask what she should do at the office. Neither will Bachmann. It's simply an attack on people that have traditionalist and fundamentalist faiths. Her choice is to follow her understanding of the scriptures in her home, and quite frankly that's her business.
Bachmann had the opportunity to make the distinction between submission in family matters vs. submission to her husband in her role as president. She did not.
The only logical conclusion is that she believes that her religious obligation to submit to her husband does extend to her role as President.
I think that we need to see Mr. Bachmann at the next debates!
Screw that crap, Bachmann DOESN'T NEED TO ANSWER that Question AT ALL. And I find it disgusting that they would even ask that question of a woman running for President. Just think if they had asked Hillary that question. you people are stupid.
Teavangelicals really crack me up.
And yet, Bachmann has repeatedly stated that wive's must submit to their husbands.
Shit dude.........they've got a wife carry, I wonder if this is the next extreme sport? Think that if Bachmann is elected, she's gonna take a carriage ride as well?
I grew up in a traditional Oneness Pentecostal home. If you know anything about Pentecostals the women are taught to be very submissive to their husbands. My father was not a big influence on my life. My step father was, growing up. I grew up with a mother who believed in submission to her husband. She didn't argue with him much and while they both were very involved in the decision making in the home, if there was a disagreement it was usually my step father that made the final decision on what to do regarding any situation. My grandmother was also Pentecostal (we're from a family of a four generation family of southern Pentecostal and Methodist Holiness preachers and clergy). She taught her daughters to be "obedient" to their husbands. It's an old fashioned way of thinking, but some people still have it.
I feel sorry for Michele Bachmann in this instance that's she's be questioned on this at all. She believes in being submissive to her husband at home, not at work. My mother and my stepfather both worked. My mother didn't call her husband and ask what she should do at the office. Neither will Bachmann. It's simply an attack on people that have traditionalist and fundamentalist faiths. Her choice is to follow her understanding of the scriptures in her home, and quite frankly that's her business.
Bachmann had the opportunity to make the distinction between submission in family matters vs. submission to her husband in her role as president. She did not.
The only logical conclusion is that she believes that her religious obligation to submit to her husband does extend to her role as President.
I think that we need to see Mr. Bachmann at the next debates!
Screw that crap, Bachmann DOESN'T NEED TO ANSWER that Question AT ALL. And I find it disgusting that they would even ask that question of a woman running for President. Just think if they had asked Hillary that question. you people are stupid.
Bachmann won't scare me until she's elected.
Until then? She's just a goofy bitch on the television screen.
Like Hillary Clinton, she's too controversial to be elected.....but she is fun to watch.
The fact that she's straining to get her mouth around that doesn't reflect well on Marcus.
Screw that crap, Bachmann DOESN'T NEED TO ANSWER that Question AT ALL. And I find it disgusting that they would even ask that question of a woman running for President. Just think if they had asked Hillary that question. you people are stupid.
If CaliGirl submits to me, I'll respect her...I swear I will!
Bachmann won't scare me until she's elected.
Until then? She's just a goofy bitch on the television screen.
Like Hillary Clinton, she's too controversial to be elected.....but she is fun to watch.
The fact that she's straining to get her mouth around that doesn't reflect well on Marcus.
Screw that crap, Bachmann DOESN'T NEED TO ANSWER that Question AT ALL. And I find it disgusting that they would even ask that question of a woman running for President. Just think if they had asked Hillary that question. you people are stupid.
Hillary never stated that a wife must submit to her husband dipshit.
Bachmann did.
really, so you don't look at Hillary standing by and taking back her hound dog adulterer husband... as a sign of SUBMISSION?
believe me, a LOT OF PEOPLE DO.