🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Rick Scott Wants to Raise Taxes

Rick Scott is a crook. Every bit as greedy and unscrupulous as Trump. Do you really want these lowlifes in office?
Again, nothing about what I posted, you seem to make up a lot of stupid crap and divert to make a point.

Here is a point, I have never voted for Scott, Trump, Biden, Obama, McCain, Romney and I don't plan on ever voting for them. I think both parties are very corrupt and work for corporate America. If you and most Americans would smarten up about the two parties, they wouldn't vote against their self interests and vote for a third party that matches their interests. You really want lowlife's like the Republicans or Democrats in office?
 
Again, nothing about what I posted, you seem to make up a lot of stupid crap and divert to make a point.

Here is a point, I have never voted for Scott, Trump, Biden, Obama, McCain, Romney and I don't plan on ever voting for them. I think both parties are very corrupt and work for corporate America. If you and most Americans would smarten up about the two parties, they wouldn't vote against their self interests and vote for a third party that matches their interests. You really want lowlife's like the Republicans or Democrats in office?
He posted that Rick Scott is a crook. You believe that or you don't.
 
Where did I talk about balancing the budget?

:oops8:
So you have goal except that you are against national defense

thats even worse

but I suspect if I hadnt pointed out how impractical your idea was that balancing the budget would have been your first excuse
 
Why don't lefties love Scott if he wants people who earn 200k to 300k to pay more federal taxes? Isn't that what democrats have been pushing for? Scott is the only senator with a set of balls to actually say it.
 
Has anyone noticed how many times Fox News has the republican senator Rick Scott as a guest?
He is the 2nd wealthiest US senator, with Mitt Romney right above him. Both of those guys would love to take away your social security benefits. They would love for the poor to pay more taxes while the rich do not.

Rumor is that Rick Scott wants the GOP nod for president in 2024. And to raise your taxes. Take it out on the poor. Like 60% of the workers in this nation who pay the brunt already.

"The 69-year-old Florida senator, NRSC chairman and former Florida governor isn’t talking about raising federal income taxes on someone with an annual salary of $200,000 or $300,000. As Scott sees it, someone making $13,000 or $14,0000 a year isn’t paying enough taxes."

Half the people in this country don't have to pay that despicable Federal Income Tax.

I am no lover of that RINO Scott but why shouldn't everybody have to pay for the cost of government? If you don't have to pay then doesn't that make you a welfare queen?

Then they would have skin in the game and maybe think before voting for a big government weenie.

I am against big government and a progressive tax rate.

We should have much smaller cost of government and everybody should have to contribute.
 
So you have goal except that you are against national defense

thats even worse

but I suspect if I hadnt pointed out how impractical your idea was that balancing the budget would have been your first excuse

No I never once considered balancing the budget with Military cuts it was a response to the TAX increase proposal the OP is making, cutting spending reduces the reason for a tax increase but you should know politicians hate cutting spending and tax increases of increases spending afterwards.

America has grown paranoid with war planning that forces nations to build up in response which is what China is doing with their Navy and Airforce when they have the world biggest Carriers and more on the way and their Jet Fighters are comparable with America and now because of Chinas Naval increase is spurring Japan to build up their Navy too a growing snowball effect.

America is selling warfare readiness and exporting lots war materials to the world which is why it is getting more and more unstable that is the why America Military industrial Complex is a big threat to world peace.
 
No I never once considered balancing the budget with Military cuts it was a response to the TAX increase proposal the OP is making, cutting spending reduces the reason for a tax increase but you should know politicians hate cutting spending and tax increases of increases spending afterwards.

America has grown paranoid with war planning that forces nations to build up in response which is what China is doing with their Navy and Airforce when they have the world biggest Carriers and more on the way and their Jet Fighters are comparable with America and now because of Chinas Naval increase is spurring Japan to build up their Navy too a growing snowball effect.

America is selling warfare readiness and exporting lots war materials to the world which is why it is getting more and more unstable that is the why America Military industrial Complex is a big threat to world peace.
America is rightfully responding to the military threat from china

and so is Japan and Australia among other nations in the region

south korea just replaced their pro china president with a man who is pro America and ready to rebuild the military alliance that has been somewhat tattered during the past 5 years
 
America is rightfully responding to the military threat from china

and so is Japan and Australia among other nations in the region

south korea just replaced their pro china president with a man who is pro America and ready to rebuild the military alliance that has been somewhat tattered during the past 5 years

America is leading the way to a highly militarized future that is what you keep overlooking.

Chine is RESPONDING to the American aggressive use of Sea power since they are getting more and more pressure in the China Sea and over Taiwan by growing American aggressiveness.

So, No America is meddling areas of the world that are far from our homeland thus not a valid "National Defense" argument.
 
Scott says what he thinks regardless of political outcome and phony criticism by the left while the doddering old president hides in a safe house in Delaware. Which one shows leadership?
 
America is leading the way to a highly militarized future that is what you keep overlooking.

Chine is RESPONDING to the American aggressive use of Sea power since they are getting more and more pressure in the China Sea and over Taiwan by growing American aggressiveness.

So, No America is meddling areas of the world that are far from our homeland thus not a valid "National Defense" argument.
You have a more benigne impression of china than its closest neighbors do

china is an expansionist dictatorship that covets land and ocean that does not belong to it

china seeks military, economic and political domination of as much of the world that it is able to subjugate
 
The pirate guy is a warmongering Bushbot sleaze.

Tulsi is one of the last sane democrats.
I do not understand how people come to this belief.

Tulsi is as socialist as AOC and Bernie.

Did you see her bikini photos and conclude, "This babe is the best Democrat ever!"?
 
I agree with that, and it is sad since it is around 1 trillion a massive waste of money, but I like to make it clear that is the biggest possible place to cut spending.
Nah. Tax expenditures are. $1.4 trillion. Way more than Defense.
 
You have a more benigne impression of china than its closest neighbors do

china is an expansionist dictatorship that covets land and ocean that does not belong to it

china seeks military, economic and political domination of as much of the world that it is able to subjugate

Ha ha ha, again you make assumption on me who didn't once support China in any way in the entire forum.

Of course, they are a danger never said they were not, but YOU seem to have a habit of trying to put words into my mouth thinking otherwise which you NEVER quote.

The China Sea (why do you think it called the CHINA sea in the first place) is right there off their main coastline which is understandable why they want control over that region of the sea while America is prowling the seas far from home and making some threats over the China sea area with Japan getting them to contest China over it.

India and Russia are the main border nations with some tiny nations to the southwest of them where do you think they are going to invade?

That is normally called intimidating by military presence and political alliance in a region far from home it is clear you are being blind to American overt meddling in areas far from home.
 

Forum List

Back
Top