Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 17,400
- 4,992
Which doesNOT give any nameYou can search by image.
STOP DODGING THE QUESTION
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which doesNOT give any nameYou can search by image.
Sure it would... but I doubt you looked.Which doesNOT give any name
STOP DODGING THE QUESTION
No it would notSure it would... but I doubt you looked.
I understand how it works perfectly fine... I've tracked several images to their source using it.No it would not
You do not grasp how it works
And you are a proven liar
You do not know shit about itI understand how it works perfectly fine... I've tracked several images to their source using it.
You clearly don't.
Rosembaum was half his size, and unarmed.
it wasn't self-defense.
A black man in a hoodie ran out of a CVS.
He said, "I wish I had my AR so I could shoot that guy!"
Too bad the jury didn't get to hear that.
Too bad they didn't see pictures of him exchanging racist gestures with the Proud Boys.
Too bad they didn't see the video of him beating a 14 year old girl senseless.
Guy, your butthurt is fun to watch, but you've become boring.You do not know shit about it
A source does not equal and owner DUMBASS
Now why do you lie about rittenhouse like a coward?
Guy, he was a punk with a gun who went to a riot looking for trouble and found it. I know that he lived out the wank fantasy of every ammosexual out there, but these things have consequences.Joseph Rosenbaum was a 36 year old 'man.' Rittenhouse was a 17 year old kid. A 36 year old, N-word slinging man chased and attempted to attack a 17 year old kid, after having verbally threatened the 17 year old kid. If Kyle was just itching to shoot someone, why did he run at all? Why not shoot the 36 year old man as soon as he started chasing him?
Look, I'm really sorry that the facts of the case simply don't line up with your ideological beliefs, that has to be a tough pill to swallow, but we need you to at least try...
Did he say 'I wish I could shoot that guy because he's black?'
it is he wanted to kill Rittenhouse for no reasonI don’t know it it was premedtated on Rosenbaum’s part but it was definitely self defense on Rittenhouse’s part.
1.) Then why didn’t the officer shoot anyone else in the mob? If the mob is a threat, why just shoot one of them?Because only one of those was a credible threat.
Babbit was part of an angry mob that was storming congress.
Rosenbaum was an angry homeless guy.
Fuck the plastic bag. The throwing of the bag is inconsequential to what prompted Rittenhouse to shoot and was never touted as a reason for his shooting.He was going to kill Rittenhouse with a plastic bag he threw at him... riiiiiight.
Irrelevant. Given the curfew, no one had any business being out there.Is it?
He had no business being in Kenosha that night. He didn't live there. He hadn't worked there in months.
I'd say what a piece of shit Kyle is, but that was already established when he gunned down three people in the middle of the street.
1.) Then why didn’t the officer shoot anyone else in the mob? If the mob is a threat, why just shoot one of them?
2.) If an officer is justified in shooting one man who is advancing on him and saying “I’m gonna kill you”, why is a civilian not justified in shooting for the same reason?
Shooting her got the point across.
Because the civilian had no business being there.
Again, if this was established fact, you’d have a point. It is not. This is pure speculation on your part. At least admit that much if for no other reason than to regain some semblance of integrity.He wasn't defending his home or even a community he lived in. He was looking for someone to murder.