That is false.depends if you believe Zimmerman's self defense story, considering he had no cuts or bruises.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is false.depends if you believe Zimmerman's self defense story, considering he had no cuts or bruises.
i'm not asserting one way or the other. Some people might look at the evidence and thing that Trayvon was attacked, and visa versa. But one thing is not in dispute is that zimmerman should have just sat and waited for police.That is false.
The point is, he did have bruises and marks on him, consistent with having his head pounded into the pavement. And another thing is not in dispute. Trayvon should have just gone on home after Zimmerman lost him.i'm not asserting one way or the other. Some people might look at the evidence and thing that Trayvon was attacked, and visa versa. But one thing is not in dispute is that zimmerman should have just sat and waited for police.
That is my opinion. So I guess you are right, I made up my own opinion. Which, BTW, you cannot prove is not true.that he was there to shoot people,, or provoked anyone to attack him,,
thats how opinions work,, the burden is on you to prove it right,,That is my opinion. So I guess you are right, I made up my own opinion. Which, BTW, you cannot prove is not true.
Here's the link...You are a lying sack of shit that claimed rittenhouse shot a first responder.
Not to me!And "in your eyes" means exactly nothing.
You hope minors kill people?We can only hope.
Who are you again?Not to me!
I heard the 911 call with my own ears and he was definately told to "stop following".No, she didnt say that and she definitely never had the authority in the first place, furthermore, Zimmerman did exactly what she said. We know this based on his cell ping. Trayvon circled back and hunted down Zimmerman as he was returning to his truck.
All the shit youre saying is what you idiots were saying before the trial. You clearly fidnt follow the trial, otherwise you wouldnt be so ignorant of the actual facts.
no law that says he had to comply,,I heard the 911 call with my own ears and he was definately told to "stop following".
You consider self defense to be murder? A jury acquitted him.He's a murderer who needs the holy fuck beat out of him!
Here's the link...
Am I lying now fuckhead?
Only when I try to elevate my opinion to a fact, that I have to provide proof.thats how opinions work,, the burden is on you to prove it right,,
Billo.Who are you again?
I am aware of his OJ jury aquittal.You consider self defense to be murder? A jury acquitted him.
so far youre at the same level as a fartOnly when I try to elevate my opinion to a fact, that I have to provide proof.
That link said he was a paramedic. Paramedics are first responders. A big man can admit when he is wrong. Are you a big man?Grosskreutz is a COMMUNIST! He ISN'T a first responder. You bleat about that violent piece of shit WHO WASN'T HELPING PEOPLE, he used it as a ploy, like the antifa fuckers who claim to be medics while committing violent crimes, but Rittenhouse WAS helping people.
Your head is so far up your ass you can't see anything but brown.
To compare that jury with the OJ jury is ridiculous.I am aware of his OJ jury aquittal.
Have you ever "walked the dog"? Fart in one room and have the smell follow you into another room?so far youre at the same level as a fart