Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Today's new video proves that 100% false. Complete self-defense proved CONCLUSIVELY.Kyle Rittenhouse instigated bloodshed at BLM protest: Prosecutor
Charged with killing two during violent protests in Wisconsin last year, Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty.www.aljazeera.com
yeah right. blm instigated the whole thing in the first place. burning and tearingh up shit. now it looks like they are protesting in front of the court house.
Kyle Rittenhouse instigated bloodshed at BLM protest: Prosecutor
Charged with killing two during violent protests in Wisconsin last year, Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty.
yeah right. blm instigated the whole thing in the first place. burning and tearingh up shit. now it looks like they are protesting in front of the court house.
Today's new video proves that 100% false. Complete self-defense proved CONCLUSIVELY.
Fuck BLM. The Illinois Governor should dispatch officers with fire hoses and snarly dogs to deal with those BLMtards at the court house.
Yeah. Like that's ever gonna happen.
exaclty. blm caused eveythingToday's new video proves that 100% false. Complete self-defense proved CONCLUSIVELY.
Any reasonable person would be in fear for their life if they were in KR's shoes. He was being chased by an irate fucking crazy nutjob pedophile rapist, arsonist, rioter and terrorist, who got out of the looney bin earlier that day, who had wrapped his shirt around his head, obviously to hide his identity.In your dreams.
The defense has claimed self defense, but they don't have to prove it. If the prosecution casts enough doubt on that claim, the claim will be rejected by the jury.
What will be interesting is this: in cases where self defense is claimed, the accused often takes the stand. The jury wants to hear the accused say he was in fear for his life. Without putting him on the stand, the claim of self defense will be difficult to demonstrate, because only one person can say how Rittenhouse felt at the time he pulled the trigger.
But does the defense really want to put a barely 18 year old kid up against a seasoned prosecutor like Binger?
In your dreams.
The defense has claimed self defense, but they don't have to prove it. If the prosecution casts enough doubt on that claim, the claim will be rejected by the jury.
What will be interesting is this: in cases where self defense is claimed, the accused often takes the stand. The jury wants to hear the accused say he was in fear for his life. Without putting him on the stand, the claim of self defense will be difficult to demonstrate, because only one person can say how Rittenhouse felt at the time he pulled the trigger.
But does the defense really want to put a barely 18 year old kid up against a seasoned prosecutor like Binger?
Seems that two of them shot had prior felonies, in fact one had a pistol illegally.
You would love to dig up Bull Connor, wouldn't you?Fuck BLM. The Illinois Governor should dispatch officers with fire hoses and snarly dogs to deal with those BLMtards at the court house.
Yeah. Like that's ever gonna happen.
Any reasonable person would be in fear for their life if they were in KR's shoes. He was being chased by an irate fucking crazy nutjob pedophile rapist, arsonist, rioter and terrorist, who got out of the looney bin earlier that day, who had wrapped his shirt around his head, obviously to hide his identity.
Why do scuzballs like you always automatically take the side of the pedophile?
Because no one in Illinois listens to him?Why would the Governor of Illinois do that?
Because no one in Illinois listens to him?
And that was my joke. It’s in WI and the IL gov is there because no one in IL would listen to him. Joke.I was just wondering, because the trial is taking place in Wisconsin, not Illinois...
There's not a snowball's chance in Hell the defense would make an issue of that, since that makes their client every bit as guilty.
The histories of the individuals Rittenhouse shot may not be much help, simply because there's no way Rittenhouse could've known any of that information, and therefore wouldn't be able to use it as a cause for his self defense...
There's not a snowball's chance in Hell the defense would make an issue of that, since that makes their client every bit as guilty.
The histories of the individuals Rittenhouse shot may not be much help, simply because there's no way Rittenhouse could've known any of that information, and therefore wouldn't be able to use it as a cause for his self defense...
when was there a pedophile in this?Any reasonable person would be in fear for their life if they were in KR's shoes. He was being chased by an irate fucking crazy nutjob pedophile rapist, arsonist, rioter and terrorist, who got out of the looney bin earlier that day, who had wrapped his shirt around his head, obviously to hide his identity.
Why do scuzballs like you always automatically take the side of the pedophile?
Heading on the right track but I would prefer that the military be called and out to exterminate the cockroaches.Fuck BLM. The Illinois Governor should dispatch officers with fire hoses and snarly dogs to deal with those BLMtards at the court house.
Yeah. Like that's ever gonna happen.
~~~~~~
No one is claiming that Rittenhouse knew these people before the incident. However, it goes to proves that the three were not there as observers. They were active in the arson, looting and especially the violence..
