Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Democrats won't allow Fox to hold debates...Let the little GOP whiners take turns moderating their own debates!
I would still rather hear it from them, in their own words, not from a lefty who has nothing but contempt for them.I think we have a good idea of what they will do. Most of the republicans want to gut ssi, gut our ability to maintain our own country and give out big fucking tax breaks to the rich.I don't care who does them, I just wish they'd ask about what the candidates would do while in office. Wow, crazy shit, huh?.
.
Yesterday, Megyn Kelly said no journalist would agree to any restrictions on what he/she could or could not ask.
And while I don't think the candidates should be able to dictate the subject matter in any way, I wonder why in the world we are having journalists or television hosts moderate the debates. Why not ask competent academics or interrogators or business types, etc. to state that they will focus on the issues with an interest to generate non partisan information not widely known by the public and, if they understand and agree to that, why would they not make far better moderators than journalists eager to make a name for themselves?
Actually, that's a pretty good idea. Get some real experts in their field to ask the questions rather than journalists.
I like it!
You're mistaken those are Rinos...I would still rather hear it from them, in their own words, not from a lefty who has nothing but contempt for them.I think we have a good idea of what they will do. Most of the republicans want to gut ssi, gut our ability to maintain our own country and give out big fucking tax breaks to the rich.I don't care who does them, I just wish they'd ask about what the candidates would do while in office. Wow, crazy shit, huh?.
.
Yesterday, Megyn Kelly said no journalist would agree to any restrictions on what he/she could or could not ask.
And while I don't think the candidates should be able to dictate the subject matter in any way, I wonder why in the world we are having journalists or television hosts moderate the debates. Why not ask competent academics or interrogators or business types, etc. to state that they will focus on the issues with an interest to generate non partisan information not widely known by the public and, if they understand and agree to that, why would they not make far better moderators than journalists eager to make a name for themselves?
Actually, that's a pretty good idea. Get some real experts in their field to ask the questions rather than journalists.
I like it!
10/1 the RW's would still whine like 13 year old girls ..
You mean like how the same networks do in the democratic debates? I don't recall you whining about the softball questions there?Yeah..............great...............give the GOP places where they have fawning fans that only ask softball questions, and nothing about policy.
Just like Democrats have for years.I would still rather hear it from them, in their own words, not from a lefty who has nothing but contempt for them.I think we have a good idea of what they will do. Most of the republicans want to gut ssi, gut our ability to maintain our own country and give out big fucking tax breaks to the rich.I don't care who does them, I just wish they'd ask about what the candidates would do while in office. Wow, crazy shit, huh?.
.
Yesterday, Megyn Kelly said no journalist would agree to any restrictions on what he/she could or could not ask.
And while I don't think the candidates should be able to dictate the subject matter in any way, I wonder why in the world we are having journalists or television hosts moderate the debates. Why not ask competent academics or interrogators or business types, etc. to state that they will focus on the issues with an interest to generate non partisan information not widely known by the public and, if they understand and agree to that, why would they not make far better moderators than journalists eager to make a name for themselves?
Actually, that's a pretty good idea. Get some real experts in their field to ask the questions rather than journalists.
I like it!
10/1 the RW's would still whine like 13 year old girls ..
If they can't argue the question. Well, they should go back home.
Democrats won't allow Fox to hold debates...Let the little GOP whiners take turns moderating their own debates!
So paybacks are a motherfucker...
Yeah..............great...............give the GOP places where they have fawning fans that only ask softball questions, and nothing about policy.
Let Fox News host the remaining GOP debates!
Yup, with Neil Cavuto, Stuart Varney and Lou Dobbs as moderators.
Good plan.
Good plan - with government haters and racists. Did you ever see the Family Guy episode entitled "Tea Peter"? It's about Peter joining the Tea Party and shutting down the government.
Actually, there was more substance and talk of policy and issues in the Dem debate than there ever has been in the current Rep debates.
Dems aren't really interested in name calling, they want to show the differences in their policies and what direction they think the country should go.
This is all bizarre to me. There's no excuse for just asking explosive questions, outside of being a ratings whore.I would still rather hear it from them, in their own words, not from a lefty who has nothing but contempt for them.I think we have a good idea of what they will do. Most of the republicans want to gut ssi, gut our ability to maintain our own country and give out big fucking tax breaks to the rich.I don't care who does them, I just wish they'd ask about what the candidates would do while in office. Wow, crazy shit, huh?.
.
Yesterday, Megyn Kelly said no journalist would agree to any restrictions on what he/she could or could not ask.
And while I don't think the candidates should be able to dictate the subject matter in any way, I wonder why in the world we are having journalists or television hosts moderate the debates. Why not ask competent academics or interrogators or business types, etc. to state that they will focus on the issues with an interest to generate non partisan information not widely known by the public and, if they understand and agree to that, why would they not make far better moderators than TV celebrities eager to make a name for themselves?
Actually, we're just rolling our eyes at the narcissists in both ridiculous parties.the country is laughing at the right ...
Lol does the GOP want some cheese to go along with all that whine?
Let the little GOP whiners take turns moderating their own debates!
Trump clearly won
No it was Carson
Nope, Cruz won
Rubio was the winner ..
as witnessed on this board.
These dolts can't even pick a clear winner, and the mods/station/format is their BIG problem ??????
the country is laughing at the right ...