Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[Monk-Eye]

" Coprophiliac Blubbers About Every Dying Plastic Baby Doll On The Planet Ignores Goad "

* Mind Your Own Fucking Mentally Retarded Business *

So you can't summarize your position like I can summarize my position?
My position is that abortion is a crime and given the complexity of the issue the punishment for that crime should be minimal... as in a Class "C" misdemeanor with no jail time.
#winning

Yeah , but your position is stupid .

The only crime committed thus far is the sedition by scRotus in its dumbfounded dobbs decision .

 

[NotfooledbyW]

ding xiii,cxix. : My position is that abortion is a crime and given the complexity of the issue the punishment for that crime should be minimal... as in a Class "C" misdemeanor with no jail time. dvng 241227 Srvwgo13119

NotfooledbyW xiii,cxxii. to 13119. : Abortion is not a crime. it is an individual natural right granted to every woman by the mother of the universe and eternal universal truth. nfbw 241227 Vrvwgo13122

 

[ding]

Summary: Saint Ding seeks punishment for everyone he considers to be morally inferior to him.,

Incorrect, my position explains it all. And you still can't summarize your position.

 

[ding]

Abortion is not a crime. it is an individual natural right granted to every woman by the mother of the universe and eternal universal truth.

Abortion is literally killing a human life, so it is a crime.

 

[ding]

Yeah , but your position is stupid .

Abortion is literally killing a human life, so it is a crime.

 

[ding]

The only crime committed thus far is the sedition by scRotus in its dumbfounded dobbs decision .

Life isn't fair. Expect to make sacrifices.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Pretentious Charade That Contemporary Natural Law Alludes To Anything Natural "

* Legal Positivism For Dummies And Normative Values From Writs Of Rites *

Abortion is literally killing a human life, so it is a crime.

A law exists because there is an entity capable of and issuing a retort for violations of some lawful construct ; cite a law within nature , or other wise by goad , whereby a prompt death occurs to an individual which kills a hue mammon being .

There is zero proof that there is a law within nature , or other wise by goad , whereby the killing of a hue mammon being is a crime .

 

[ding]

" Pretentious Charade That Contemporary Natural Law Alludes To Anything Natural "

* Legal Positivism For Dummies And Normative Values From Writs Of Rites *

A law exists because there is an entity capable of and issuing a retort for violations of some lawful construct ; cite a law within nature , or other wise by goad , whereby a prompt death occurs to an individual which kills a hue mammon being .

There is zero proof that there is a law within nature , or other wise by goad , whereby the killing of a hue mammon being is a crime .

I think legal positivism is for communists and should be hung by their toes and filled with exlax.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Abortion is literally killing a human life, so it is a crime.

Killing a human being in self defense or to prevent physical, mental, material harm, is not a crime.

 

[ding]

Killing a human being in self defense or to prevent physical, mental, material harm, is not a crime.

Sounds like you are rationalizing that all abortions are good and just.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Sounds like you are rationalizing that all abortions are good and just.

I cited one crucial fact that refutes your argument’s last gasp of air, and now you are stuck.

Unless you can prove to a woman with a 100% irrevocable guarantee, signed by God himself or herself, who wants to make a decision about her life in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy, that no harm will come to her if she chooses to deliver an unwanted pregnancy to the world, you have absolutely no argument getting around the woman’s right self defense

 

[ding]

I cited one crucial fact that refutes your argument’s last gasp of air, and now you are stuck.

Unless you can prove to a woman with a 100% irrevocable guarantee, signed by God himself or herself, who wants to make a decision about her life in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy, that no harm will come to her if she chooses to deliver an unwanted pregnancy to the world, you have absolutely no argument getting around the woman’s right self defense

Still sounds like you are rationalizing that all abortions are good and just.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Still sounds like you are rationalizing that all abortions are good and just.

“sounds like“. ????? when a woman chooses to kill the human life inside her own body it has zero impact on my life and zero impact on society as a whole. It has zero impact on you. There is no reason to judge
whether such a woman is doing something good or doing something evil. It’s nobody’s business. It’s not my business and it’s not your business. There is no rationalization needed with regard to abortion.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

“sounds like“. ????? when a woman chooses to kill the human life inside her own body it has zero impact on my life and zero impact on society as a whole. It has zero impact on you. There is no reason to judge
whether such a woman is doing something good or doing something evil. It’s nobody’s business. It’s not my business and it’s not your business. There is no rationalization needed with regard to abortion.

If you believe in God then yes it impacts you.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

If you believe in God then yes it impacts you.

Being an American citizen does not require anyone to believe in God. So how can a private citizen that I do not know having the abortion procedure performed on her body in a safe legal environment impact me or how can it impact anyone?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Excuse Of Could Have Issued Judgement But Expects Ewes Two Due It "

* Self Officiated Dispensers Of Judgement By Goad Wearing Foolish Hats *

I think legal positivism is for communists and should be hung by their toes and filled with exlax.

Of course you would , torture , judgement , infliction of suffering somehow to rectify indifference of judgement issued only through goad .

Without an entity capable of issuing a retort for violations of some lawful construct , the contemporary natural rites theorists are reduced to pandering dogma .

As for the communist being hung by their toes and filled with exlax , would the communists be atheistic and secular or sectarian and theistic ?

For example , catholic church is sectarian and theistic and it seeks to promulgate a doctrine of asceticism that includes theism , chastity and communism .

The catholic church maintains a stand against both abortion and death penalty because a hue mammon life is involved ,.

However , as an entity capable of and issuing a retort for violations of some lawful construct , a legitimate state interest is bound with individual citizens , through a live birth requirement for equal protection .

Thus with respect to constitution and legitimate state interests , for abortion a rite to life by live birth has not been met and for death penalty a rite to life has been removed , albeit through due process , for having removed a rite to life of another individual .

The catholic church promotes abdication to determinism and to forsake judgement , so as not to be judged , with an expectation that only goad should judge and exact death , with conjecture for a theatrical macabre of final day of judgement , when which one would pay atonement for taking a hue mammon life .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Not Your Elevated Privilege To Prohibit So Deal With It "

* Ass Clown Squeaks Horn *

Life isn't fair. Expect to make sacrifices.

Take your own advice .

 

[ding]

“sounds like“. ????? when a woman chooses to kill the human life inside her own body it has zero impact on my life and zero impact on society as a whole. It has zero impact on you. There is no reason to judge
whether such a woman is doing something good or doing something evil. It’s nobody’s business. It’s not my business and it’s not your business. There is no rationalization needed with regard to abortion.

Yes, it sounds like. Maybe we should give them medals and throw them parades for being so brave. Would that please you?

 

[ding]

" Not Your Elevated Privilege To Prohibit So Deal With It "

* Ass Clown Squeaks Horn *

Take your own advice .

Would you like a fetus skinned lampshade?

 

[ding]

" Excuse Of Could Have Issued Judgement But Expects Ewes Two Due It "

* Self Officiated Dispensers Of Judgement By Goad Wearing Foolish Hats *

Of course you would , torture , judgement , infliction of suffering somehow to rectify indifference of judgement issued only through goad .

Without an entity capable of issuing a retort for violations of some lawful construct , the contemporary natural rites theorists are reduced to pandering dogma .

As for the communist being hung by their toes and filled with exlax , would the communists be atheistic and secular or sectarian and theistic ?

For example , catholic church is sectarian and theistic and it seeks to promulgate a doctrine of asceticism that includes theism , chastity and communism .

The catholic church maintains a stand against both abortion and death penalty because a hue mammon life is involved ,.

However , as an entity capable of and issuing a retort for violations of some lawful construct , a legitimate state interest is bound with individual citizens , through a live birth requirement for equal protection .

Thus with respect to constitution and legitimate state interests , for abortion a rite to life by live birth has not been met and for death penalty a rite to life has been removed , albeit through due process , for having removed a rite to life of another individual .

The catholic church promotes abdication to determinism and to forsake judgement , so as not to be judged , with an expectation that only goad should judge and exact death , with conjecture for a theatrical macabre of final day of judgement , when which one would pay atonement for taking a hue mammon life .

That's nice. Why can't we commercialize their body parts, mammon?