beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 43,905
- 16,328
- 2,250
Right to privacy eh ? ROTFLMBORFC2212-#5,573 Ray From Cleveland “So what's the point of bringing my opinion into it?
NFBW: Your opinion is the legal reason that your secondary “politically biased” opinion is erroneous and not Constitutional because it is driven by religious zealotry ( @Beagle ) instead of Constitutional legal precedence and foundation.
RFC2212-#5,573 Ray From Cleveland It is none of my business what a person does because personal decisions are just that--personal.
NFBW: You are absolutely correct. A woman’s personal decision is private and personal when it comes to what to do about an unwanted pregnancy. The court ruled it was a private, basically a personal matter prior to viability of the fetus outside the womb, and that ruling lasted for fifty years.
But here you contradict yourself to put party over the abortion rights of women when you claim it is not a private personal matter because abortion is not addressed in the Constitution.
RFC2212-#5,573 Ray From Cleveland However I support the Roe ruling because abortion is not constitutionally protected. It's not in the document, it was never discussed by the authors, it was a bad ruling back in the 70's when it was made.
NFBW: I’m hoping you stand by your primary opinion that what a woman does during pregnancy is her own business and none of your business and not the business of any system of government or organized religion.
You cannot hold both because what you call a bad ruling of the 70s was actually decided based on the right to privacy that every law abiding citizen gets, including pregnant women. Right to privacy is mentioned in the Constitution.
So which is it?
END2211121825 Florence
Pffft, is there any such thing, now that the evil minion's of Lucifer himself are running all these high tech platforms that are learning everything they can about each and everyone of you ? Go cry your right to privacy to Lucifer, and see how much attention you get.... lol