jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,218
- 29,148
- 2,180
again, what's the point of the OP but to give out information? stone lied, he's paying the price, good for him. Now can you say that to any of your demolosers like clinton bleach bitting devices while under subpoena? nope. Never, that is when true deflection is observed. Let's see you deflect on this one. this should be good.Good thing nobody on your team ever lies to your face, huh?
Exactly. A/K/A Tu Quoque, a/k/a Pogo's Law.
And then after being called on it he came back and did the same thing AGAIN, apparently expecting different results.
Amazing the logical fog some wags intentionally swim in.
What they also don't seem to get about such deflection is that it's an implicit admission of the validity of the (your) original point, the object being "okay granted but let's retrain this spotlight somewhere else as soon as possible so we can sweep this under the rug".