Safe And Effective ®: 6.6% of Side Effects Listed As Serious

Grow some balls. Give us the acceptable number of healthy people that you’re comfortable with being maimed and killed by the jab.
Be honest and admit you’re just a scaremonger. I’m not happy with any, but it’s still less dangerous than the alternative.
 
If it’s substantially less than the total death rate from the disease itself, that’s the best that can be expected. Sorry, not falling for that idiotic number request.
Except that WuFlu deaths mainly only occur in a few demographics, old and fat.

For the first two years the average age of a WuFlu death was 80.

So why should young, non-obese people risk having serious medical issues for the rest of their lives, or even death, for a disease that has no chance of killing them?
 
Deaths represented a stunning 1.3% of side effects reports.

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the injection?

There’s a reason the government won’t let you sue Big Pharma for damages.

While data shows that “most reported adverse events were mild and short in duration,” according to the study, which was published in the UK-based medical journal The Lancet, 6.6% of all side effects were categorized as “serious,” and resulted in “inpatient hospitalisation, prolongation of hospitalisation, permanent disability, life-threatening illness, congenital anomaly or birth defect.”


6.3% of the patients having serious side effects and 1.3% of the people croaking after receiving the treatment really isn't that outrageous for a serious disease. Those rates for a cancer or aids treatment would be pretty good news.

But the real point is that Corona isn't nearly as deadly as the Fauci Death Cult has suggested it is. Most people just get over this self limited bug.

People really need to see a much higher safety profile for minor ailments like acne or covid or dandruff, than for serious ailments like emphysema or cirrhosis or parkinsons.
 
Except that WuFlu deaths mainly only occur in a few demographics, old and fat.

For the first two years the average age of a WuFlu death was 80.

So why should young, non-obese people risk having serious medical issues for the rest of their lives, or even death, for a disease that has no chance of killing them?
The chances of a bad outcome from Covid is still higher than that from the vaccine by a long shot, even for younger, healthier people. Do some real research.

Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center
 
Any advertised prescription drug has to list the risks and side effects of taking the stuff. It's the law but hysterical fans of the Biden administration jabbed little kids with a drug that proved fatal in rare instances and possibly had lasting effects. Who do we see about that? Fauci seems to be among the missing these days. Maybe he is in Ukraine salvaging his bio-weapons.
 
Safe and effective. Remember just a few week ago when our president claimed that these "vaccines" were so effective that we would not have to worry about getting Covid? Well it turns out that they are not nearly as "effective" as promised. Now lets discuss "safe". As it turns out, more and more information is being allowed to be seen (that simply can not be ignored) that suggests that these "vaccines" are not nearly as "safe" as was promised. For an obese 85 year old with several health problems the "jab" was a good bet, statistically. However injecting a healthy 12 year old with such a potentially harmful (experimental) drug is insane. And yes the fourth shot is on the way, and now they are developing a Covid "vaccine" for our 6 month old infants. So, in the near future, we will have Americans bragging about getting the 4th shot and proudly stated that their 6 month old child has been "jabbed". IMHO any adult has the right to get "jabbed", but no adult on earth has the right to jab an infant with an experimental drug that has a very high probability of doing permanent harm. Instead of simply "picking a side", I implore all Americans to question any "Authority" demanding "jabs"....Follow the money.
 

Forum List

Back
Top