Saul Alinsky allusionary reference to satan

[tyroneweaver]

Snopes maintains this isn't a dedication. But it's all but.

 

[ding]

Well... communism is naturalized humanism.

 

[Compost]

Really now, Snopes? An acknowledgement of the "first radical" is in a book about being a radical, Lucifer is called by name, his rebellion against the establishment lauded, is just an allegory.

 

[ding]

Really now, Snopes? An acknowledgement of the "first radical" is in a book about being a radical, Lucifer is called by name, his rebellion against the establishment lauded, is just an allegory.

Yes, just like the Fabian Society's coat of arms - a wolf in sheep's clothing - is allegorical too.

 

[Compost]

Really now, Snopes? An acknowledgement of the "first radical" is in a book about being a radical, Lucifer is called by name, his rebellion against the establishment lauded, is just an allegory.

Yes, just like the Fabian Society's coat of arms - a wolf in sheep's clothing - is allegorical too.

No, not necessarily.

 

[ding]

Really now, Snopes? An acknowledgement of the "first radical" is in a book about being a radical, Lucifer is called by name, his rebellion against the establishment lauded, is just an allegory.

Yes, just like the Fabian Society's coat of arms - a wolf in sheep's clothing - is allegorical too.

No, not necessarily.

How so?

 

[Compost]

Really now, Snopes? An acknowledgement of the "first radical" is in a book about being a radical, Lucifer is called by name, his rebellion against the establishment lauded, is just an allegory.

Yes, just like the Fabian Society's coat of arms - a wolf in sheep's clothing - is allegorical too.

No, not necessarily.

How so?

Just because the Fabian society's coat of arms is allegorical doesn't mean Alinsky's acknowledgement of Lucifer as the first radical is allegorical.

 

[ding]

Really now, Snopes? An acknowledgement of the "first radical" is in a book about being a radical, Lucifer is called by name, his rebellion against the establishment lauded, is just an allegory.

Yes, just like the Fabian Society's coat of arms - a wolf in sheep's clothing - is allegorical too.

No, not necessarily.

How so?

Just because the Fabian society's coat of arms is allegorical doesn't mean Alinsky's acknowledgement of Lucifer as the first radical is allegorical.

I see. Why do you believe it is may not be allegorical?

 

[Compost]

Really now, Snopes? An acknowledgement of the "first radical" is in a book about being a radical, Lucifer is called by name, his rebellion against the establishment lauded, is just an allegory.

Yes, just like the Fabian Society's coat of arms - a wolf in sheep's clothing - is allegorical too.

No, not necessarily.

How so?

Just because the Fabian society's coat of arms is allegorical doesn't mean Alinsky's acknowledgement of Lucifer as the first radical is allegorical.

I see. Why do you believe it is may not be allegorical?

Because I've read the book.

 

[ding]

Yes, just like the Fabian Society's coat of arms - a wolf in sheep's clothing - is allegorical too.

No, not necessarily.

How so?

Just because the Fabian society's coat of arms is allegorical doesn't mean Alinsky's acknowledgement of Lucifer as the first radical is allegorical.

I see. Why do you believe it is may not be allegorical?

Because I've read the book.

Ok, so are you saying that he is doing evil for evil's sake?

 

[Compost]

No, not necessarily.

How so?

Just because the Fabian society's coat of arms is allegorical doesn't mean Alinsky's acknowledgement of Lucifer as the first radical is allegorical.

I see. Why do you believe it is may not be allegorical?

Because I've read the book.

Ok, so are you saying that he is doing evil for evil's sake?

No. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying he admires Lucifer. I base that on what he wrote.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Clinton loves Alinsky. Alinsky loves Satan.

No surprise then that Clinton loves Satan.