Project 2025

[Lesh]

I heard a little bit about this from the biased left-wing media. They obviously are biased and a disgrace to the country. With their bias coverage of the BLM riots compared to January 6, for example

Anyway, I briefly looked at project 2025 The project 2025 is not at all racist from what I’ve seen. They actually want to eliminate racism including anti-white racism. They want to criminalize pornography. They want to Make abortion illegal.

There are some things I might disagree with like taking some of the funding away from Medicaid and Medicare.

Also Christian values would play more of a role in the government which is something that’s not controversial. It’s always played a part in our countries history and we are a Christian majority country. Realize that many of the charitable groups in the world are Christian based.

The lying and bad politics from Democrats is hopefully going to end. I bet some of them never even read what project 2025 is about. Apparently, Mr. Trump does not endorse project 2025 but maybe he should. Democrats make Project 2025 out as if it is something from the devil and it’s once again something they blatantly lie about. Please just educate yourself on the project itself,

Project 2025: The myths and the facts

The sweeping conservative plan for Trump's second term is very real. Here’s what it actually says.

www.vox.com

Project 2025 | Presidential Transition Project

Presidential Transition Project The 2025 Presidential Transition Project paves the way for an effective conservative Administration based on four pillars.

www.project2025.org

They want to make abortion illegal…

You bet. That’s no small thing


And criminalizing porn?

Good luck with THAT

 

[Lesh]

Do you believe that Christians should?

They aren’t

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

He won't, but the left might. They're big on silencing their foes.

You do know Trump and Magadonia went after every Trump critic trying to silence them all?

Oh wait!

 

[FranklinRoosevelt_FTW]

Wasn't that hard to find.

MYTHS VS. FACTS ABOUT PROJECT 2025
We are not affiliated with former President Trump. We are a coalition of more than 110 conservative groups advocating policy and personnel recommendations.

1. End no fault divorce: FALSE Divorce is not mentioned in our policy handbook, Mandate for Leadership.

2. Complete ban on abortions without exceptions: FALSE Mandate for Leadership calls for the government to comply with laws that prevent federal funding of abortion. It also calls for federal support for alternatives to abortion, including adoption.

3. Ban contraceptives: FALSE Mandate for Leadership says nothing about banning or restricting contraception.

4. Additional tax breaks for corporations and the 1%: MISLEADING Mandate for Leadership calls for LOWER taxes for ALL Americans, to stimulate economic growth and put more money in Americans’ pockets.

5. Higher taxes for the working class: FALSE Mandate for Leadership calls for LOWER taxes for ALL Americans. Individuals spend their money in more productive ways than the government does.

6. Elimination of unions and worker protections: FALSE Mandate for Leadership presents different ideas about a conservative labor policy. It calls for combatting the excesses of the Deep State’s bloated federal employee unions, which have ensured that federal employees keep their jobs even if they engage in illegal behavior or perform their jobs poorly.

7. Raise the retirement age: FALSE Raising the retirement age is nowhere advocated in Mandate for Leadership.

8. Cut Social Security: FALSE Mandate for Leadership does not advocate cutting Social Security.

9. End Affordable Care Act: FALSE Mandate for Leadership offers policy suggestions to curb the abuses of the Affordable Care Act.

10. Raise prescription drug prices: FALSE Mandate for Leadership offers proposals to lower drug prices through competition and innovation.

11. Eliminate the Department of Education: TRUE Mandate for Leadership calls for an end to the Department of Education. Since the Department was created, educational outcomes have not improved, and the American school system has increasingly fallen behind other countries. Giving more control back to state and local governments and expanding school choice would improve education outcomes for all Americans, especially underprivileged communities. Some functions of the Department would be moved to other departments including Labor, Justice, and Commerce.

12. Use public, taxpayer money for private religious schools: TRUE Americans are able to use taxpayer money to choose where they shop for groceries, attain housing, and obtain higher education. Religious schools often outperform public schools, and families should have the choice to send their children to these schools.

13. Teach Christian religious beliefs in public schools: FALSE Mandate for Leadership advocates for all educational opportunities, and for parental rights in education.

14. End free and discounted school lunch programs: FALSE Mandate for Leadership advocates that the Food and Nutrition Service be moved from the Department of Agriculture to the Department of Health and Human Services. Mandate condemns the Biden administration’s decision to threaten schools that do not comply with radical transgender policies by taking away their funding for school meals for needy students. Additionally, Mandate supports prioritizing school meal programs for those students who are truly needy, not creating an entitlement for almost all students regardless of family income levels.

15. End civil rights and DEI protections in government: MOSTLY FALSE Mandate for Leadership calls for respecting the civil rights of all Americans, including those who have been censored by the government or had it weaponized against them. Mandate advocates for the end of divisive, race-based, anti-American propaganda in the federal workforce.

16. Ban African American and gender studies in all levels of education: FALSE Mandate for Leadership does not mention African American studies or gender studies.

17. Ban books and curriculum about slavery: FALSE Mandate for Leadership does not advocate for banning books or curriculum about slavery.

18. Ending climate protections: FALSEMandate for Leadership advocates policies that will produce economic growth through abundant, affordable energy. Famers, hunters, and fishers know how to protect our environment better than D.C. bureaucrats. The Biden administration’s relentless focus on climate has made America less competitive and wasted crucial taxpayer dollars.

19. Increase Arctic drilling: TRUE The Arctic is of immense strategic importance to America. Mandate for Leadership advocates a strong pursuit of American interests in the region, through economic freedom, through ensuring free and open shipping lanes, and through the development of the vast energy resources of the Arctic.

20. Deregulate big business and the oil industry: MOSTLY TRUE America needs energy that is plentiful and affordable. Mandate for Leadership calls for an all-of-the-above energy policy that would promote the development of our domestic energy supply, and for fewer burdensome regulations for ALL businesses.

21. Promote and expedite capital punishment: TRUE The appropriateness of capital punishment divides Americans, and conservatives, of good will. Mandate for Leadership calls for the enforcement of the federal death penalty where appropriate and applicable, and recommends a future presidential administration pursue the death penalty for the most heinous crimes, including those involving violence and the sexual abuse of children, unless Congress says otherwise through legislation.

22. End marriage equality: FALSE The legal recognition of same-sex marriage is not discussed in Mandate for Leadership. Mandate calls for the protection of faith-based grant recipients who maintain support for the traditional definition of marriage. Mandate also supports conscience protections for those who do not wish to participate in same-sex marriages.

23. Condemn single mothers while promoting only “traditional families”: FALSE Mandate suggests that a future HHS Secretary replace the policies of the Biden administration that prioritize LGBTQ+ equality, subsidize single motherhood, disincentivize work, and penalize marriage with policies that instead encourage marriage, work, motherhood, fatherhood, and nuclear families.

24. Defund the FBI and Homeland Security: FALSE Mandate for Leadership supports de-weaponizing the federal government, including the FBI. Mandate’s chapter on the Department of Homeland Security advocates the legislative creation of a standalone Cabinet-level agency with a focus on the border and immigration, including U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CPB), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), and the Office of Immigration Litigation (OIL). It also recommends that legislation be pursued to move other component parts of DHS to other agencies, including the Department of Transportation, the Department of Defense, the Department of the Treasury, and the FBI.

25. Use military to break up domestic protests: FALSE The “protests” referenced in Mandate for Leadership are protests in Iran against its anti-American leadership; and protests of parents at school board meetings in opposition to critical race theory and COVID mandates. Both protests are referenced positively. Mandate also protests the FBI’s harassment of protesting parents and condemns the arrest by armed FBI agents of a man who had protested at an abortion clinic a year earlier.

26. Mass deportation of immigrants and incarceration in “camps”: MISLEADINGMandate supports an orderly and lawful immigration system. It advocates that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Office of Removal Operations be primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the removal of those who have violated our immigration laws. It also calls for additional resources to put an end to President Biden’s border crisis and enforce immigration laws.

27. End birthright citizenship: FALSE There is no mention of ending birthright citizenship in Mandate for Leadership.

28. Ban Muslims from entering the country: FALSE There is no mention of banning Muslims from entering the United States in Mandate for Leadership.

29. Eliminate federal agencies like the FDA, EPA, NOAA and more: FALSE Mandate for Leadership’s plan would not eliminate the FDA or the EPA, and NOAA’s functions would be transferred to other agencies, the private sector, and states and territories.

30. Continue to pack the Supreme Court and lower courts with right-wing judges: FALSE The only people calling for packing the judiciary are those on the Left, who do it every time the Supreme Court or a lower court makes decisions they don’t like.

Excellent job. And it’s going to be up to the Biden supporters in this thread to at least read what you’ve posted because you make it very simplified. I’m willing to bet that they’re not going to read your post and they’re going to continue to make a mockery
of the subject.


Hopefully I’m wrong and they at least read your post.


From what I understand, the principal of Project 2025 is to eliminate racism and favoritism which includes eliminating DEI on the federal level. Why in the world would anybody be against that?

DEI and BLM promote racism and divisiveness…. those groups and agendas need to be sent to the dustbin of history.

DEI promotes blatant favoritism promoting job quotas for so-called minorities instead of meritocracy. The only people who would support BLM and DEI are either racist or they simply have no idea what they’re talking about.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

They want to make abortion illegal…

You bet. That’s no small thing


And criminalizing porn?

Good luck with THAT

They want to criminalize this?

I mean Melania said she was proud of her raunchy nude modeling days.

 

[Darkwind]

They aren’t

Only Jews are under more attack than Christians in this country.

 

[OldFlame]

They want to make abortion illegal…

You bet. That’s no small thing


And criminalizing porn?

Good luck with THAT

False.

MYTHS VS. FACTS ABOUT PROJECT 2025
We are not affiliated with former President Trump. We are a coalition of more than 110 conservative groups advocating policy and personnel recommendations.

1. End no fault divorce: FALSE Divorce is not mentioned in our policy handbook, Mandate for Leadership.

2. Complete ban on abortions without exceptions: FALSE Mandate for Leadership calls for the government to comply with laws that prevent federal funding of abortion. It also calls for federal support for alternatives to abortion, including adoption.

 

[Darkwind]

You do know Trump and Magadonia went after every Trump critic trying to silence them all?

Oh wait!

View attachment 981841

Replying 'in-kind," I guess, to someone like you is going on attack.

Lets examine conduct, shall we?

When describing someone as a "MAGA" or a "Trumper", do you think that the person you are attacking is not permitted to retaliate in like fashion?

Or do you often find yourself attacked for providing commentary on public policy you promote? Oh wait, you don't promote any public policy. You just attack MAGA and Trumpers as cult of personality.

Don't believe Me? Look at the graphic you just posted.

Project 2025 is a serious, POLICY-ONLY document that makes no mention of the cult of personality at all.

I guess you have been broken and cannot have simple policy disagreements with people. It's right to the insults. In fact, your posting history shows that is the ONLY thing you post.

Have a nice day. I've got some work to do.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Replying 'in-kind," I guess, to someone like you is going on attack.

Lets examine conduct, shall we?

When describing someone as a "MAGA" or a "Trumper", do you think that the person you are attacking is not permitted to retaliate in like fashion?

Or do you often find yourself attacked for providing commentary on public policy you promote? Oh wait, you don't promote any public policy. You just attack MAGA and Trumpers as cult of personality.

Don't believe Me? Look at the graphic you just posted.

Project 2025 is a serious, POLICY-ONLY document that makes no mention of the cult of personality at all.

I guess you have been broken and cannot have simple policy disagreements with people. It's right to the insults. In fact, your posting history shows that is the ONLY thing you post.

Have a nice day. I've got some work to do.

Trump himself called hi following "Magadonians"

next

 

[Lesh]

Replying 'in-kind," I guess, to someone like you is going on attack.

Lets examine conduct, shall we?

When describing someone as a "MAGA" or a "Trumper", do you think that the person you are attacking is not permitted to retaliate in like fashion?

Or do you often find yourself attacked for providing commentary on public policy you promote? Oh wait, you don't promote any public policy. You just attack MAGA and Trumpers as cult of personality.

Don't believe Me? Look at the graphic you just posted.

Project 2025 is a serious, POLICY-ONLY document that makes no mention of the cult of personality at all.

I guess you have been broken and cannot have simple policy disagreements with people. It's right to the insults. In fact, your posting history shows that is the ONLY thing you post.

Have a nice day. I've got some work to do.

Those “policies” are the antithesis of what most of America wants or can tolerate

 

[Winco]

Do you believe that Christians should?

No.

But you are using Christianity as a form of Indoctrination and forcing others to accept what you want, and THAT is the problem.

 

[Meathead]

Thats just a convoluted way of saying that you agree we are not a Christian Nation just because most identify themselves that way.

If you want to take exception and counter what I said, do so, but don't put words in my mouth.

 

[Kilroy2]

Republicans are supposed to be conservatives.

So it's not Project 2025 then? You're contradicting yourself now.

Well you are saying republicans are supposed to be conservative and that is why they support and try to push all things that are conservative.

Yet you are contradicting yourself by admitting republicans are conservative

So why would they not introduce initiatives that are conservative talking points.

which explains why you refuse to acknowledge the obvious.

 

[Weatherman2020]

2025 reminds you of Glorious Five Year Plan, Comrade?

Tell us more how Biden has a vibrant mind, parrot.

 

[OldFlame]

Those “policies” are the antithesis of what most of America wants or can tolerate

You don't speak for 'most' of America.

 

[Darkwind]

No.

But you are using Christianity as a form of Indoctrination and forcing others to accept what you want, and THAT is the problem.

yet, you are using the University system as a form of indoctrination and forcing others to accept what they want to get a degree.


THAT IS a problem.

 

[OldFlame]

Well you are saying republicans are supposed to be conservative and that is why they support and try to push all things that are conservative.

Yet you are contradicting yourself by admitting republicans are conservative

So why would they not introduce initiatives that are conservative talking points.

WTF? How am I 'contradicting' myself by 'admitting' reps are conservatives?

Let's get back to Project 2025, your prior post did not align with the article you posted or what Project 2025 says. Care to try again?

 

[Lesh]

You don't speak for 'most' of America.

What I don’t speak for is MAGAnuts

And that ain’t most of America

 

[Darkwind]

Those “policies” are the antithesis of what most of America wants or can tolerate

They are not. That is the problem with blanket statements like this. They are actually anecdotal, not truth.

The crown you hang with and the people you identify with may be against those policies, but most of America would not be.

 

[OldFlame]

What I don’t speak for is MAGAnuts

And that ain’t most of America

That's right, you don't, so STFU.