Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,337
- 822
- 140
" School Choice Reimbursement Is An Illegitimate Precept Of Direct Taxation "
* Precepts Of Direct Versus Indirect Taxation *
A direct tax is sometimes referred to as a per capitation tax , or a head tax , which is a tax on private property holdings , and consequently the direct tax is to be applied as near as possible for the direct benefit of the individual being taxed , though not for the direct benefit of any individual in particular .
An indirect tax is acquired indirectly as a commerce tax , such as income tax , and consequently an indirect tax can be applied indirectly for the benefit of the individuals being taxed .
A traditional debate in existence since public education began , is whether a direct tax could be applied towards public education , and that contention is further exacerbated by disingenuous zealots ignoring , a " near as possible for the direct benefit of the individual being taxed , though not for the direct benefit of any individual in particular a collective benefit " , while also seeking to allocate direct taxes in violation of us first amendment establishment clause .
* Opening Post Contentions Including Bias *
Consider a direct tax state which implements a reimbursement to house holds for up to $10,000 in tuition , to " authorized institutions of learning " , which are supposedly subject to oversight and audit , where a $10,000 reimbursement value is a rough estimate by texas legislature for the education of one child per year .
Consider a direct tax of approximately $10,000 annual on the property of a homeowner which is without children and also consider the fractional portion of an annual $10,000 property tax which is allocated for education , for which the homeowner receives considerably limited if any direct benefit .
Under a direct tax system , the only semi-legitimate entitlement of reimbursement to a house hold is the fractional portion of taxes collected from property that are distributed for education .
The supposed government minimalists of direct tax states are seeking to implement public policy methods of for tuition reimbursement for allowing school choice , however such methods violate the precepts of direct taxation .
* Coerced Sectarian Budgets *
It is my fervent opinion that because " religious institutions " are exempt from taxation , that religious institutions also do not receive public funding of any kind , even under a presumption of their being designated at 501c3 institutions .
No house hold would be required to front moneys for tuition so long as supposed education institutions are capable of delaying payments of debt until reimbursement from county coffers is provided .
The catholic and lutheran institutions are being paid vast sums of moneys to inundate the us with illegal migrants , which in and of itself should be a violation of us first amendment establishment clause .
Those same zealots are now seeking to gain more constrictive holds over public narratives , by institutionalizing sectarian psychopathy , which also violates direct tax precepts .
Got madrassa ?
* Self Determination Versus Self Ownership Of Individualism *
Irrespective of whether positive wrights , as laws prescribing authoritarian actions of a state , are legitimate aggression , or illegitimate aggression ( violence ) , a direct tax is extracted from an entitlement to private property through the self ownership element of individualism .
Many are educated in catholic schools , however the tuition was paid by private individuals and not garnered from public coffers .
Is someone want to fund private education , they should pay for it themselves .
The federal government provided an indirect tax of $3000 per child , that was collected through indirect taxation .
* Precepts Of Direct Versus Indirect Taxation *
A direct tax is sometimes referred to as a per capitation tax , or a head tax , which is a tax on private property holdings , and consequently the direct tax is to be applied as near as possible for the direct benefit of the individual being taxed , though not for the direct benefit of any individual in particular .
An indirect tax is acquired indirectly as a commerce tax , such as income tax , and consequently an indirect tax can be applied indirectly for the benefit of the individuals being taxed .
A traditional debate in existence since public education began , is whether a direct tax could be applied towards public education , and that contention is further exacerbated by disingenuous zealots ignoring , a " near as possible for the direct benefit of the individual being taxed , though not for the direct benefit of any individual in particular a collective benefit " , while also seeking to allocate direct taxes in violation of us first amendment establishment clause .
* Opening Post Contentions Including Bias *
Consider a direct tax state which implements a reimbursement to house holds for up to $10,000 in tuition , to " authorized institutions of learning " , which are supposedly subject to oversight and audit , where a $10,000 reimbursement value is a rough estimate by texas legislature for the education of one child per year .
Consider a direct tax of approximately $10,000 annual on the property of a homeowner which is without children and also consider the fractional portion of an annual $10,000 property tax which is allocated for education , for which the homeowner receives considerably limited if any direct benefit .
Under a direct tax system , the only semi-legitimate entitlement of reimbursement to a house hold is the fractional portion of taxes collected from property that are distributed for education .
The supposed government minimalists of direct tax states are seeking to implement public policy methods of for tuition reimbursement for allowing school choice , however such methods violate the precepts of direct taxation .
* Coerced Sectarian Budgets *
It is my fervent opinion that because " religious institutions " are exempt from taxation , that religious institutions also do not receive public funding of any kind , even under a presumption of their being designated at 501c3 institutions .
No house hold would be required to front moneys for tuition so long as supposed education institutions are capable of delaying payments of debt until reimbursement from county coffers is provided .
The catholic and lutheran institutions are being paid vast sums of moneys to inundate the us with illegal migrants , which in and of itself should be a violation of us first amendment establishment clause .
Those same zealots are now seeking to gain more constrictive holds over public narratives , by institutionalizing sectarian psychopathy , which also violates direct tax precepts .
Got madrassa ?
* Self Determination Versus Self Ownership Of Individualism *
Irrespective of whether positive wrights , as laws prescribing authoritarian actions of a state , are legitimate aggression , or illegitimate aggression ( violence ) , a direct tax is extracted from an entitlement to private property through the self ownership element of individualism .
Many are educated in catholic schools , however the tuition was paid by private individuals and not garnered from public coffers .
Is someone want to fund private education , they should pay for it themselves .
The federal government provided an indirect tax of $3000 per child , that was collected through indirect taxation .
Last edited: