manifold
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #221
According to this website, there is another side of the story. And yes, it's a gay website so there might be some bias there. And no, I doubt you'll turn gay if you click on the link.
On the particular day in which this incident occurred, Mr. Franks was opening class when the topic of Christianity in Germany was broached by one student, who asked what churches were there, another whether they read the Bible in English, etc. Franks asserts that the topic of homosexuality was not broached in any way, and that Arys assertions to the contrary are entirely false. At this point, Ary declared, with a class audience, Gays cant be Christians; homosexuality is wrong, looking directly at Mr. Franks.
Franks says he understands and affirms students right to free speech, and that he is perfectly prepared to lead a respectful discussion on topics such as gay rights that allows for the assertion of opinions with which he disagrees. He has led such discussion in the past in his sociology classes. But in this case, hr feels the context makes it clear that this remark was made ad hominem, aimed specifically at him to devalue him and any information he might share on the topic of religion, on the basis of his perceived sexual orientation.
So the school district refuses to discuss it but they allow the teacher to give his side to a gay blog?
![eusa_eh :eusa_eh: :eusa_eh:](/styles/smilies/eusa_eh.gif)
This whole story is just getting fishier and fishier.