Science Proves the Bible Again

Whoelse did?

You should know this. God is never wrong; He's infallible. Humans created evolution. Charles Lyell/James Hutton created uniformitarianism and Charles Darwin created ToE in the 1850s. Prior to that, evolutionary thinking and history were created by Epicureans, Stoics and those opposed to creationists.

I had to laugh a lot now. Creative power is not a domain of the devil. Anyway. Because god created Satan and even if Satan had created evolution - what sounds more impossible than only absurde in my ears - then god had indirectly created evolution too. So what? Evolution is evolution. It's a wonderful, fantastic world in which we live. And a crocodile, which eats your baby, is not doing so, because it is evil. It is doing so, because it is hungry. Only human beings are able to be evil.

I'm not sure what chemicals you are taking, but the Bible states Satan is the "god of the world and prince of the power of the air." He is a fantastic liar and master trickster to such a point that he may have even fooled himself.. Perhaps, you, too, have had the wool pulled over their eyes because of evolution and false science. If evolution was important or a fact, then we would all know it and accept it. Many of us do not need it to live a life a joyful and honorable life. If you're a student, one can learn it to pass the test and then forget it. It doesn't happen. None of it is observable, demonstrable or falsifiable. This includes its history and thinking which came long before ToE.

Dr. Henry Morris states,

"Its top was a great temple shrine, emblazoned with zodiacal signs representing the hosts of heaven, Satan and his 'principalities and powers, rulers of the darkness of the world' (Ephesians 6:12). These evil spirits there perhaps met with Nimrod and his priests, to plan their long-range strategy against God and his redemptive purposes for the post-diluvian world. This included especially the development of a non-theistic cosmology, one which could explain the origin and meaning of the universe and man without acknowledging the true God of creation. Denial of God's power and sovereignty in creation is of course foundational in the rejection of His authority in every other sphere. . . . If something like this really happened, early in post-diluvian history, then Satan himself is the originator of the concept of evolution.

"One question remains. Assuming Satan to be the real source of the evolutionary concept, how did it originate in his mind? . . . A possible answer to this mystery could be that Satan, the father of lies, has not only deceived the whole world and the angelic hosts who followed him--he has even deceived himself! The only way he could really know about creation (just as the only way we can know about creation) was for God to tell him! . . . . He refused to believe and accept the Word of God concerning his own creation and place in God's economy . . . He therefore deceived himself into supposing that all things, including himself and including God, had been evolved by natural processes out of the primordial stuff of the universe. . . ." (Morris, Troubled Waters of Evolution, 1974, pp 74-75)."

One thing we know for sure. Satan believes in God. If there is a weakness to Morris' thinking, it's he makes a lot of assumptions of God telling Satan what he did. Thus, it may not be based on what the facts were since that isn't in the Bible. That said, we know evolutionary thinking started in the early times long before Hutton, Lyell and Darwin, so it must have a source. It could just be the Epicureans or Stoics or others.

Even today, the libs continue to make up stuff about the Tower of Babel -- How climate change caused the world's first empire to collapse.

Here's more about the the Tower of Babel and King Nimrod if you're interested -- Tower of Babel - Wikipedia, Nimrod - Wikipedia. We also have the Bible. The story of the Tower and City of Babel is found in Genesis 11:1-9. The setting given for the account us on the plain of Shinar to the final line where the city is identified with Babel. It is clear that the events recorded took place in ancient southern Mesopotamia on the eastern bank of the Euphrates River.

Babel was founded by King Nimrod, according to Genesis 10:9-10.

Up until this point in the Bible, the whole world had one language, meaning one common speech for all people. Hebrew?

The people of the earth had become skilled in construction and decided to build a city with a tower that would reach to heaven. By building the tower, they wanted to make a name for themselves and also prevent the people from being scattered.

God came to see their city and the tower they were building. He perceived their intentions, and in his infinite wisdom, he knew this "stairway to heaven" would only lead the people away from God.

God observed what a powerful force their unity of purpose created. As a result, he confused their language, causing them to speak many different languages so they would not understand each other. By doing this, God thwarted their plans. He also scattered the people of the city all over the face of the earth.

Is there archaeological evidence of the Tower of Babel?
http://christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a021.html

The Tower of Babel - Bible Story Summary
Tower of Babel Story: The Perils of Unity, Pride, and Purpose

How does Satan come into this? We saw after the fall with Adam and Eve, Cain killed his brother Abel. Wouldn't this be a time when Satan would come into play once again?

King Nimrod came into existence shortly after the Flood and that humans had not yet organized themselves into nations. Nimrod became "king in the land of Shinar (Assyria/Mesopotamia), was, according to the Book of Genesis and Books of Chronicles, the son of Cush, therefore the great-grandson of Noah. The Bible states that he was "a mighty hunter before the Lord [and] .... began to be mighty in the earth".[2] Extra-biblical traditions associating him with the Tower of Babel led to his reputation as a king who was rebellious against God. His gain in power and self-glorifying behavior fueled his desire for revenge against God for destroying his ancestors.

"Josephus wrote:

Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to reach. And that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers.

Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion ."
 
The greatest thinkers in history were all wrong or ignorant about a lot of things.

The greatest thinkers may have been wrong or ignorant, but they weren't about a lot of things. They were more right than wrong because they were great thinkers. It's people who think they were wrong or ignorant about a lot of things that are probably the ones were wrong or ignorant about a lot of things.

For example, we have liberal outrage. Libs think if they are outraged, then they are thinking and being right about a lot of things such as Trump, climate change, tree hugging, abortions and so on. I think this is why they are outraged about Christians and their religion. They do not seem too outraged about Muslims tho. I've patiently explained real science and how it backs up what the Bible says and they still DEFLECT, DENY, DISMISS and likely end up is a state of DESPAIR. You know who these people are. You are explaining how the science works and they are angry and call you names. It seems like it is due to liberal outrage. If libs aren't outraged about something, then they are thinking and using their wrong logic. Maybe it's politics creeping in to science and technology and even religion.
Einstein was a socialist and he thought quantum mechanics was wrong. He also cheated on all his wives.

And how do you come up with this?
 
In general you are right here: A change in genetical information is normally always only bad. Such changes follow the law "shit happens". But from time to time - very very seldom - for example in 1:1 000 000 changes - happens a wonder and a change in the genetical information in the microcosmos causes something, which shows in the mesocosmos (=the world where we live with our intuitive perception) a viewable advantage - or it is not only bad. Additionally biological functions are often very complex and a gene has often (perhaps always) more than only one result. It needs for example sometimes genes, which have no special context, except that they are not bad for an organism, and suddenly another genetical change becomes an advantage with them together. So for example a change 1 million years ago together with a change some thousand years ago and a change which happens today are able to build a new biological structure, basing on proteins which are produced from the DNA.

What evidence do you have for one in a million change? How did you come up with the probability? To demonstrate what you said, we need to know the probabilities, i.e. the chance that it is going to happen again in the future. Then to verify that what you said happened in the past, we would have to do simulations to see if it did happen in the past.

So two problems: We do not have any way to say genetical information is superflous (could be important in any future) - and we have normally no way to change only one special biological function by changing genes. And although most people think "evolution" is a new idea it is indeed a very old thing. We call it normally "cultivation" since thousands of years. The important step was only to see that the nature on its own is doing the same - but without any plan. Natural laws do not follow plans. That's not astonishing. But we should not do the same. We need knowledge, we need plans, we need orientation. And that's the real desaster in the moment: No one has really a good idea what he is doing in genetics. I think the best is to imitate what the nature is doing: changes in only very simple micro steps. And what no one should do is to carry genes from one species to another species. I'm sure there are very good reasons - although I'm not able to say which reasons - for the genetic separations of species. Bugs don't have sex with elephants in our world - and I fear to change this will be in our reality not funny at all.

I'm not even following your logic to this. A lot of it is your own assertions.
 
... Einstein was a socialist and he thought quantum mechanics was wrong. He also cheated on all his wives.

What's nonsense - everything what you say here. He got by the way the noble price for quantum mechaincs ("the photoelectric effect") and not for his wonderful theory of relativity. And the discussions between Albert Einstein and his friend Nils Bohr about quantum mechanics are a brilliant delight for everyone who loves natural science.

 
Last edited:
None of it is observable, demonstrable or falsifiable.
The ToE is falsifiable. Every fossil that has ever been found was a potential falsifier. If primate was found buried with a dinosaur it would be all over for the ToE. Dig through the fossil record and you'll observe evolution taking place. Talk to a microbiologist and you can ask about his observations of evolution.

It is creationism that is not observable, demonstrable or falsifiable.
 
Everything is irrelevant for you, what you do not understand
No you quack, your statement was irrelevant. You tried to get away with denigrating the efforts of moderm scientists, despite knowing less than nothing about their work, and especially about this topic, as compared to them. I called you out and mocked you for it, just as you deserve.
 
Whoelse did?

You should know this. God is never wrong; He's infallible. Humans created evolution. ...

The "theory of evolution" is this what scientists think about - but evolution on its own is a natural law in the same way how gravity is a natural law. No human being created gravity. No human being created evolution. We are able to understand what's going on in the nature all around on a very simle reason: God is not a liar. He is teu adn his creation is real. And so we are able to find out what's real or not real on our own - for example in experiments. Natural scientists ask nature what it is doing how - they do not ask god what he is doing why. The believers in atheism have often the problem not to be able to separate their belief and their knowledge about natural laws.

Example. Because the natural law "evolution" exists people are able to be farmers and shepherds. Jesus for example was a carpenter. That's very important too. But Jesus was not crucified because he was a carpenter.

 
Last edited:
In general you are right here: A change in genetical information is normally always only bad. Such changes follow the law "shit happens". But from time to time - very very seldom - for example in 1:1 000 000 changes - happens a wonder and a change in the genetical information in the microcosmos causes something, which shows in the mesocosmos (=the world where we live with our intuitive perception) a viewable advantage - or it is not only bad. Additionally biological functions are often very complex and a gene has often (perhaps always) more than only one result. It needs for example sometimes genes, which have no special context, except that they are not bad for an organism, and suddenly another genetical change becomes an advantage with them together. So for example a change 1 million years ago together with a change some thousand years ago and a change which happens today are able to build a new biological structure, basing on proteins which are produced from the DNA.

What evidence do you have for one in a million change?

None. That's only an expression for "extremely seldom". Everything what has to do with life is in this category. Life on its own is an extremely seldom manifestation of "dust".

How did you come up with the probability? To demonstrate what you said, we need to know the probabilities, i.e. the chance that it is going to happen again in the future. Then to verify that what you said happened in the past, we would have to do simulations to see if it did happen in the past.

I hate this stupid form how US-Americans "discuss" very much.

So two problems: We do not have any way to say genetical information is superflous (could be important in any future) - and we have normally no way to change only one special biological function by changing genes. And although most people think "evolution" is a new idea it is indeed a very old thing. We call it normally "cultivation" since thousands of years. The important step was only to see that the nature on its own is doing the same - but without any plan. Natural laws do not follow plans. That's not astonishing. But we should not do the same. We need knowledge, we need plans, we need orientation. And that's the real desaster in the moment: No one has really a good idea what he is doing in genetics. I think the best is to imitate what the nature is doing: changes in only very simple micro steps. And what no one should do is to carry genes from one species to another species. I'm sure there are very good reasons - although I'm not able to say which reasons - for the genetic separations of species. Bugs don't have sex with elephants in our world - and I fear to change this will be in our reality not funny at all.

I'm not even following your logic to this. A lot of it is your own assertions.

Everything what I say comes from me. Everything what you say comes from you.
 
None of it is observable, demonstrable or falsifiable.
The ToE is falsifiable.

A theory is as far as I know not falsifiable. A theory is a summary of facts including a common intepreation of this facts - but if one of the facts should be wrong this means not automatically the theory is wrong - it means only the theory has to be modified.

Every fossil that has ever been found was a potential falsifier. If primate was found buried with a dinosaur it would be all over for the ToE. Dig through the fossil record and you'll observe evolution taking place. Talk to a microbiologist and you can ask about his observations of evolution.

It is creationism that is not observable, demonstrable or falsifiable.

First of all is "the creation" everything what's observable, demonstrable or falsifiable (in sense of the philosophy "empirism"). And second is no one who believes god created the worlds and the heavens a so called "creationist". To believe in god is not a natural science nor is empirism god. Only god is god. No one has to study mathematics for example to have to see that god loves all of his children or to make a "theory of the love of god" for natural scientists and their experiments.
 
Last edited:
Everything is irrelevant for you, what you do not understand
No you quack, your statement was irrelevant. You tried to get away with denigrating the efforts of moderm scientists, despite knowing less than nothing about their work, and especially about this topic, as compared to them. I called you out and mocked you for it, just as you deserve.

Einstein said once: 'Some people have a horizon with the radius 0. They call this their standpoint.' (translation from me)
 
The greatest thinkers in history were all wrong or ignorant about a lot of things.

The greatest thinkers may have been wrong or ignorant, but they weren't about a lot of things. They were more right than wrong because they were great thinkers. It's people who think they were wrong or ignorant about a lot of things that are probably the ones were wrong or ignorant about a lot of things.

For example, we have liberal outrage. Libs think if they are outraged, then they are thinking and being right about a lot of things such as Trump, climate change, tree hugging, abortions and so on. I think this is why they are outraged about Christians and their religion. They do not seem too outraged about Muslims tho. I've patiently explained real science and how it backs up what the Bible says and they still DEFLECT, DENY, DISMISS and likely end up is a state of DESPAIR. You know who these people are. You are explaining how the science works and they are angry and call you names. It seems like it is due to liberal outrage. If libs aren't outraged about something, then they are thinking and using their wrong logic. Maybe it's politics creeping in to science and technology and even religion.
Einstein was a socialist and he thought quantum mechanics was wrong. He also cheated on all his wives.

And how do you come up with this?
I read books about Einstein.
 
Whoelse did?

You should know this. God is never wrong; He's infallible. Humans created evolution. Charles Lyell/James Hutton created uniformitarianism and Charles Darwin created ToE in the 1850s. Prior to that, evolutionary thinking and history were created by Epicureans, Stoics and those opposed to creationists.

I had to laugh a lot now. Creative power is not a domain of the devil. Anyway. Because god created Satan and even if Satan had created evolution - what sounds more impossible than only absurde in my ears - then god had indirectly created evolution too. So what? Evolution is evolution. It's a wonderful, fantastic world in which we live. And a crocodile, which eats your baby, is not doing so, because it is evil. It is doing so, because it is hungry. Only human beings are able to be evil.

I'm not sure what chemicals you are taking, but the Bible states Satan is the "god of the world and prince of the power of the air." He is a fantastic liar and master trickster to such a point that he may have even fooled himself.. Perhaps, you, too, have had the wool pulled over their eyes because of evolution and false science. If evolution was important or a fact, then we would all know it and accept it. Many of us do not need it to live a life a joyful and honorable life. If you're a student, one can learn it to pass the test and then forget it. It doesn't happen. None of it is observable, demonstrable or falsifiable. This includes its history and thinking which came long before ToE.

Dr. Henry Morris states,

"Its top was a great temple shrine, emblazoned with zodiacal signs representing the hosts of heaven, Satan and his 'principalities and powers, rulers of the darkness of the world' (Ephesians 6:12). These evil spirits there perhaps met with Nimrod and his priests, to plan their long-range strategy against God and his redemptive purposes for the post-diluvian world. This included especially the development of a non-theistic cosmology, one which could explain the origin and meaning of the universe and man without acknowledging the true God of creation. Denial of God's power and sovereignty in creation is of course foundational in the rejection of His authority in every other sphere. . . . If something like this really happened, early in post-diluvian history, then Satan himself is the originator of the concept of evolution.

"One question remains. Assuming Satan to be the real source of the evolutionary concept, how did it originate in his mind? . . . A possible answer to this mystery could be that Satan, the father of lies, has not only deceived the whole world and the angelic hosts who followed him--he has even deceived himself! The only way he could really know about creation (just as the only way we can know about creation) was for God to tell him! . . . . He refused to believe and accept the Word of God concerning his own creation and place in God's economy . . . He therefore deceived himself into supposing that all things, including himself and including God, had been evolved by natural processes out of the primordial stuff of the universe. . . ." (Morris, Troubled Waters of Evolution, 1974, pp 74-75)."

One thing we know for sure. Satan believes in God. If there is a weakness to Morris' thinking, it's he makes a lot of assumptions of God telling Satan what he did. Thus, it may not be based on what the facts were since that isn't in the Bible. That said, we know evolutionary thinking started in the early times long before Hutton, Lyell and Darwin, so it must have a source. It could just be the Epicureans or Stoics or others.

Even today, the libs continue to make up stuff about the Tower of Babel -- How climate change caused the world's first empire to collapse.

Here's more about the the Tower of Babel and King Nimrod if you're interested -- Tower of Babel - Wikipedia, Nimrod - Wikipedia. We also have the Bible. The story of the Tower and City of Babel is found in Genesis 11:1-9. The setting given for the account us on the plain of Shinar to the final line where the city is identified with Babel. It is clear that the events recorded took place in ancient southern Mesopotamia on the eastern bank of the Euphrates River.

Babel was founded by King Nimrod, according to Genesis 10:9-10.

Up until this point in the Bible, the whole world had one language, meaning one common speech for all people. Hebrew?

The people of the earth had become skilled in construction and decided to build a city with a tower that would reach to heaven. By building the tower, they wanted to make a name for themselves and also prevent the people from being scattered.

God came to see their city and the tower they were building. He perceived their intentions, and in his infinite wisdom, he knew this "stairway to heaven" would only lead the people away from God.

God observed what a powerful force their unity of purpose created. As a result, he confused their language, causing them to speak many different languages so they would not understand each other. By doing this, God thwarted their plans. He also scattered the people of the city all over the face of the earth.

Is there archaeological evidence of the Tower of Babel?
http://christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a021.html

The Tower of Babel - Bible Story Summary
Tower of Babel Story: The Perils of Unity, Pride, and Purpose

How does Satan come into this? We saw after the fall with Adam and Eve, Cain killed his brother Abel. Wouldn't this be a time when Satan would come into play once again?

King Nimrod came into existence shortly after the Flood and that humans had not yet organized themselves into nations. Nimrod became "king in the land of Shinar (Assyria/Mesopotamia), was, according to the Book of Genesis and Books of Chronicles, the son of Cush, therefore the great-grandson of Noah. The Bible states that he was "a mighty hunter before the Lord [and] .... began to be mighty in the earth".[2] Extra-biblical traditions associating him with the Tower of Babel led to his reputation as a king who was rebellious against God. His gain in power and self-glorifying behavior fueled his desire for revenge against God for destroying his ancestors.

"Josephus wrote:

Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to reach. And that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers.

Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion ."

Humans created all of the gods who preceded your gods. Humans created the more recent inventions of your gods which is why your gods share so much in common with the earlier Greek gods. Your gods possess many human attributes because they were invented by humans.
 
Whoelse did?

You should know this. God is never wrong; He's infallible. Humans created evolution. Charles Lyell/James Hutton created uniformitarianism and Charles Darwin created ToE in the 1850s. Prior to that, evolutionary thinking and history were created by Epicureans, Stoics and those opposed to creationists.

I had to laugh a lot now. Creative power is not a domain of the devil. Anyway. Because god created Satan and even if Satan had created evolution - what sounds more impossible than only absurde in my ears - then god had indirectly created evolution too. So what? Evolution is evolution. It's a wonderful, fantastic world in which we live. And a crocodile, which eats your baby, is not doing so, because it is evil. It is doing so, because it is hungry. Only human beings are able to be evil.

I'm not sure what chemicals you are taking, but the Bible states Satan is the "god of the world and prince of the power of the air." He is a fantastic liar and master trickster to such a point that he may have even fooled himself.. Perhaps, you, too, have had the wool pulled over their eyes because of evolution and false science. If evolution was important or a fact, then we would all know it and accept it. Many of us do not need it to live a life a joyful and honorable life. If you're a student, one can learn it to pass the test and then forget it. It doesn't happen. None of it is observable, demonstrable or falsifiable. This includes its history and thinking which came long before ToE.

Dr. Henry Morris states,

"Its top was a great temple shrine, emblazoned with zodiacal signs representing the hosts of heaven, Satan and his 'principalities and powers, rulers of the darkness of the world' (Ephesians 6:12). These evil spirits there perhaps met with Nimrod and his priests, to plan their long-range strategy against God and his redemptive purposes for the post-diluvian world. This included especially the development of a non-theistic cosmology, one which could explain the origin and meaning of the universe and man without acknowledging the true God of creation. Denial of God's power and sovereignty in creation is of course foundational in the rejection of His authority in every other sphere. . . . If something like this really happened, early in post-diluvian history, then Satan himself is the originator of the concept of evolution.

"One question remains. Assuming Satan to be the real source of the evolutionary concept, how did it originate in his mind? . . . A possible answer to this mystery could be that Satan, the father of lies, has not only deceived the whole world and the angelic hosts who followed him--he has even deceived himself! The only way he could really know about creation (just as the only way we can know about creation) was for God to tell him! . . . . He refused to believe and accept the Word of God concerning his own creation and place in God's economy . . . He therefore deceived himself into supposing that all things, including himself and including God, had been evolved by natural processes out of the primordial stuff of the universe. . . ." (Morris, Troubled Waters of Evolution, 1974, pp 74-75)."

One thing we know for sure. Satan believes in God. If there is a weakness to Morris' thinking, it's he makes a lot of assumptions of God telling Satan what he did. Thus, it may not be based on what the facts were since that isn't in the Bible. That said, we know evolutionary thinking started in the early times long before Hutton, Lyell and Darwin, so it must have a source. It could just be the Epicureans or Stoics or others.

Even today, the libs continue to make up stuff about the Tower of Babel -- How climate change caused the world's first empire to collapse.

Here's more about the the Tower of Babel and King Nimrod if you're interested -- Tower of Babel - Wikipedia, Nimrod - Wikipedia. We also have the Bible. The story of the Tower and City of Babel is found in Genesis 11:1-9. The setting given for the account us on the plain of Shinar to the final line where the city is identified with Babel. It is clear that the events recorded took place in ancient southern Mesopotamia on the eastern bank of the Euphrates River.

Babel was founded by King Nimrod, according to Genesis 10:9-10.

Up until this point in the Bible, the whole world had one language, meaning one common speech for all people. Hebrew?

The people of the earth had become skilled in construction and decided to build a city with a tower that would reach to heaven. By building the tower, they wanted to make a name for themselves and also prevent the people from being scattered.

God came to see their city and the tower they were building. He perceived their intentions, and in his infinite wisdom, he knew this "stairway to heaven" would only lead the people away from God.

God observed what a powerful force their unity of purpose created. As a result, he confused their language, causing them to speak many different languages so they would not understand each other. By doing this, God thwarted their plans. He also scattered the people of the city all over the face of the earth.

Is there archaeological evidence of the Tower of Babel?
http://christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a021.html

The Tower of Babel - Bible Story Summary
Tower of Babel Story: The Perils of Unity, Pride, and Purpose

How does Satan come into this? We saw after the fall with Adam and Eve, Cain killed his brother Abel. Wouldn't this be a time when Satan would come into play once again?

King Nimrod came into existence shortly after the Flood and that humans had not yet organized themselves into nations. Nimrod became "king in the land of Shinar (Assyria/Mesopotamia), was, according to the Book of Genesis and Books of Chronicles, the son of Cush, therefore the great-grandson of Noah. The Bible states that he was "a mighty hunter before the Lord [and] .... began to be mighty in the earth".[2] Extra-biblical traditions associating him with the Tower of Babel led to his reputation as a king who was rebellious against God. His gain in power and self-glorifying behavior fueled his desire for revenge against God for destroying his ancestors.

"Josephus wrote:

Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to reach. And that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers.

Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion ."

Humans created all of the gods who preceded your gods. Humans created the more recent inventions of your gods which is why your gods share so much in common with the earlier Greek gods. Your gods possess many human attributes because they were invented by humans.
James Bond actually believes that God has a penis.
 
None of it is observable, demonstrable or falsifiable.
The ToE is falsifiable. Every fossil that has ever been found was a potential falsifier. If primate was found buried with a dinosaur it would be all over for the ToE. Dig through the fossil record and you'll observe evolution taking place. Talk to a microbiologist and you can ask about his observations of evolution.

It is creationism that is not observable, demonstrable or falsifiable.

Is that what the evos claimed when they found the fossil? For example, we have tailed monkey to tailless monkey. I don't think there was a fossil to show that. The fossil is supposed to have a test to show that the claim could be false.

Anyway, ToE has been shown to be false from what you just said haha -- New Study Supports Idea That Primates, Dinosaurs Coexisted. We do not see any evolution taking place. All we get are hypotheses that it did take place. Very little transitional fossil evidence.

Your last statement is BS. We found the chicken came before the egg in 2017 because the protein found outside the shell can only be produced by the chicken. It's a fact now. One day, a chickens (hens and roosters) popped into existence.
 
Last edited:
Evolution on its own is a natural law in the same way how gravity is a natural law

Boy, are you off. Evolution isn't a law; It's a theory. We have the law of gravity because we can do calculations on it. We have Mendel's laws of heredity because we can do calculations on it and derive probability. What calculations can you do with ToE?
 
None. That's only an expression for "extremely seldom". Everything what has to do with life is in this category. Life on its own is an extremely seldom manifestation of "dust".

None means it won't happen in the future. Obviously, if there is zero chance of something happening, then our trials will show that it did not happen in the past.

I hate this stupid form how US-Americans "discuss" very much.

I'm only asking in order to clarify so I am clear in what you are saying. Part of it is language. I am not used to hearing extremely seldom. You brought up life. We do not have life without God. The dust takes shape and becomes animated with his breath of life. This does not happen otherwise. There is no common ancestor that led to it.

Everything what I say comes from me. Everything what you say comes from you.

That's fine. You are entitled to opinions. I just did not see an argument to back what you are stating such as God created evolution or evolution is a natural law.
 
The greatest thinkers in history were all wrong or ignorant about a lot of things.

The greatest thinkers may have been wrong or ignorant, but they weren't about a lot of things. They were more right than wrong because they were great thinkers. It's people who think they were wrong or ignorant about a lot of things that are probably the ones were wrong or ignorant about a lot of things.

For example, we have liberal outrage. Libs think if they are outraged, then they are thinking and being right about a lot of things such as Trump, climate change, tree hugging, abortions and so on. I think this is why they are outraged about Christians and their religion. They do not seem too outraged about Muslims tho. I've patiently explained real science and how it backs up what the Bible says and they still DEFLECT, DENY, DISMISS and likely end up is a state of DESPAIR. You know who these people are. You are explaining how the science works and they are angry and call you names. It seems like it is due to liberal outrage. If libs aren't outraged about something, then they are thinking and using their wrong logic. Maybe it's politics creeping in to science and technology and even religion.
Einstein was a socialist and he thought quantum mechanics was wrong. He also cheated on all his wives.

And how do you come up with this?
I read books about Einstein.

Can you reference the book(s) you got this from?
 

Forum List

Back
Top