skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Those vast sums are why M.J. Kelly, a University of Cambridge engineering professor, recently wrote that the push to restrict carbon "is set to fail comprehensively in meeting its avowed target, and a new debate is needed." For that reason, Kelly is skeptical that initiatives like the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) in Paris will achieve its lofty goals.
In peer-reviewed research, Kelly argued carbon dioxide should be considered the byproduct of the "immense benefits" of a technologically advanced society. Cutting carbon, he added, could result in a dramatic reduction in the world's quality of life that would usher in mass starvation, poverty and civil strife. Massive decarbonization is "only possible if we wish to see large parts of the population die from starvation, destitution or violence in the absence of enough low-carbon energy to sustain society."
The costs of carbon cuts? 'Mass starvation, poverty and strife': Scientist
Hmmm............yeah..........sounds like a great idea to revisit Cap and Trade!!!
Or not.........
We got a handful of real stoopid mofus in this forum, do we not??!!!
In peer-reviewed research, Kelly argued carbon dioxide should be considered the byproduct of the "immense benefits" of a technologically advanced society. Cutting carbon, he added, could result in a dramatic reduction in the world's quality of life that would usher in mass starvation, poverty and civil strife. Massive decarbonization is "only possible if we wish to see large parts of the population die from starvation, destitution or violence in the absence of enough low-carbon energy to sustain society."
The costs of carbon cuts? 'Mass starvation, poverty and strife': Scientist
Hmmm............yeah..........sounds like a great idea to revisit Cap and Trade!!!
Or not.........
We got a handful of real stoopid mofus in this forum, do we not??!!!
