liarintheWH
Diamond Member
- Oct 24, 2012
- 1,915
- 1,802
- 1,930
emptystep is a dumb fuck
That's a new one. I gave you pos rep.
Thanks, dumb fuck.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
emptystep is a dumb fuck
That's a new one. I gave you pos rep.
People kill with guns. The sole purpose of a gun is to kill. People who would like to kill would like a gun to do it with. Why exactly is it that people with extreme firepower who want to kill lots of people make the news? Probably because they are so successful.
You think a ban on guns will stop the killing??
If so your not to smart there ES. Criminals can buy a gun on the street anywhere, anytime.
The only folks who won't have guns are the law abiding citizens.
If someone breaks into your house you can call 911, if you have the time. Let me know how long it takes for the police to come save your ass.
I'll be saving mine with my dogs and my shotgun. Bet I save mine faster than yours gets saved. If it does that is.
And no one is trying to take away your shotgun, or your dogs, so why are you defending the AR-15 with the 30 round mag?
People kill with guns. The sole purpose of a gun is to kill. People who would like to kill would like a gun to do it with. Why exactly is it that people with extreme firepower who want to kill lots of people make the news? Probably because they are so successful.
You think a ban on guns will stop the killing??
If so your not to smart there ES. Criminals can buy a gun on the street anywhere, anytime.
The only folks who won't have guns are the law abiding citizens.
If someone breaks into your house you can call 911, if you have the time. Let me know how long it takes for the police to come save your ass.
I'll be saving mine with my dogs and my shotgun. Bet I save mine faster than yours gets saved. If it does that is.
And no one is trying to take away your shotgun, or your dogs, so why are you defending the AR-15 with the 30 round mag?
Absolute HOGWASH.. the SOLE purpose of a firearm is to shoot a projectile of a specific size in a specific direction at a specific degree of accuracy at a specific velocity
It is a TOOL....
And you are an idiot
And the sole purpose of a car is to make the wheels go round and round.
So then by YOUR logic, if the car is used to kill it's purpose is to kill... got it
Go back to school and learn something, idiot
And the sole purpose of a car is to make the wheels go round and round.
So then by YOUR logic, if the car is used to kill it's purpose is to kill... got it
Go back to school and learn something, idiot
Here are pictures of two 'tools'. Can you see my point now or do I have to beat you with the first one?
And the sole purpose of a car is to make the wheels go round and round.
So then by YOUR logic, if the car is used to kill it's purpose is to kill... got it
Go back to school and learn something, idiot
Here are pictures of two 'tools'. Can you see my point now or do I have to beat you with the first one?
The problem with that proposal is that it does NOTHING to keep firearms/magazines out of the hands of crazies and criminals while simultaneously ensuring law abiding citizens are put at a tactical disadvantage against those that don't give a shit about your regulations.
How can you not have a problem with laws that help to ensure criminals are better armed than the people? Stated differently, why would you want to help the bad guys?
Why have speed limits when only reckless people would drive too fast? And if I need to pass a buck twenty to get somewhere on time that is my God Given Right!
There is no right to a car in the consitution. there is a right to travel, but the method is not defined.
Also roads are only designed for certain speeds, so while the speed limit may be much lower than the desgin limit, 120 MPH is usually well above the design limit.
And finally there is no pre-emtive limit to speeding. There are no governors on cars. You only get in trouble when you get caught breaking the law.
Next lame argument please.
So then by YOUR logic, if the car is used to kill it's purpose is to kill... got it
Go back to school and learn something, idiot
Here are pictures of two 'tools'. Can you see my point now or do I have to beat you with the first one?
And your point is??
Each is designed to do something.. and each can be used for something beyond what their purpose or design is...
Go learn something, tool
Why have speed limits when only reckless people would drive too fast? And if I need to pass a buck twenty to get somewhere on time that is my God Given Right!
There is no right to a car in the consitution. there is a right to travel, but the method is not defined.
Also roads are only designed for certain speeds, so while the speed limit may be much lower than the desgin limit, 120 MPH is usually well above the design limit.
And finally there is no pre-emtive limit to speeding. There are no governors on cars. You only get in trouble when you get caught breaking the law.
Next lame argument please.
Ah, but this lame argument still has legs.
If excess speed became an issue to the degree that firearms have there would probably be legislation to curb the problem. I would even bet that you would support such legislation given your reasoning.
And the sole purpose of a car is to make the wheels go round and round.
So then by YOUR logic, if the car is used to kill it's purpose is to kill... got it
Go back to school and learn something, idiot
Here are pictures of two 'tools'. Can you see my point now or do I have to beat you with the first one?
Why have speed limits when only reckless people would drive too fast? And if I need to pass a buck twenty to get somewhere on time that is my God Given Right!
There is no right to a car in the consitution. there is a right to travel, but the method is not defined.
Also roads are only designed for certain speeds, so while the speed limit may be much lower than the desgin limit, 120 MPH is usually well above the design limit.
And finally there is no pre-emtive limit to speeding. There are no governors on cars. You only get in trouble when you get caught breaking the law.
Next lame argument please.
Ah, but this lame argument still has legs.
If excess speed became an issue to the degree that firearms have there would probably be legislation to curb the problem. I would even bet that you would support such legislation given your reasoning.
Do you think we are incapable of trying to solve multiple problems at the same time?
People kill with guns. The sole purpose of a gun is to kill. People who would like to kill would like a gun to do it with. Why exactly is it that people with extreme firepower who want to kill lots of people make the news? Probably because they are so successful.
You think a ban on guns will stop the killing??
If so your not to smart there ES. Criminals can buy a gun on the street anywhere, anytime.
The only folks who won't have guns are the law abiding citizens.
If someone breaks into your house you can call 911, if you have the time. Let me know how long it takes for the police to come save your ass.
I'll be saving mine with my dogs and my shotgun. Bet I save mine faster than yours gets saved. If it does that is.
And no one is trying to take away your shotgun, or your dogs, so why are you defending the AR-15 with the 30 round mag?
That may be but no one would carry it around because it sucks as a shovel. The screwy thing that is suppose to hold the blade in place will not stay tight.
There is no right to a car in the consitution. there is a right to travel, but the method is not defined.
Also roads are only designed for certain speeds, so while the speed limit may be much lower than the desgin limit, 120 MPH is usually well above the design limit.
And finally there is no pre-emtive limit to speeding. There are no governors on cars. You only get in trouble when you get caught breaking the law.
Next lame argument please.
Ah, but this lame argument still has legs.
If excess speed became an issue to the degree that firearms have there would probably be legislation to curb the problem. I would even bet that you would support such legislation given your reasoning.
Short feeble legs, like your feeble mind.
There is legislation, its called speed limits. And again, it punishes those who break the laws, not those who did not.
And I would not support such legislation, as I am pefectly capable of doing 75 in a 65.
You think a ban on guns will stop the killing??
If so your not to smart there ES. Criminals can buy a gun on the street anywhere, anytime.
The only folks who won't have guns are the law abiding citizens.
If someone breaks into your house you can call 911, if you have the time. Let me know how long it takes for the police to come save your ass.
I'll be saving mine with my dogs and my shotgun. Bet I save mine faster than yours gets saved. If it does that is.
And no one is trying to take away your shotgun, or your dogs, so why are you defending the AR-15 with the 30 round mag?
Because that's what you're trying to take away, numb-nutz. At least, that's what you're admitting to. An AR-15 with a 30 round mag is exactly the kind of gun the 2nd amendment was intended to protect - the kind of gun the militia would use.
I am so sorry if you are being 'punished' by not being allowed an AR-15 which would leave you at a 'tactical' disadvantage.
Ah, but this lame argument still has legs.
If excess speed became an issue to the degree that firearms have there would probably be legislation to curb the problem. I would even bet that you would support such legislation given your reasoning.
Short feeble legs, like your feeble mind.
There is legislation, its called speed limits. And again, it punishes those who break the laws, not those who did not.
And I would not support such legislation, as I am pefectly capable of doing 75 in a 65.
I am so sorry if you are being 'punished' by not being allowed an AR-15 which would leave you at a 'tactical' disadvantage. Does that mean police should have to carry SAWs so they do not find themselves at a tactical disadvantage?