rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 287,975
- 167,599
- 2,615
He has to answer yes or no on this bill. Why can't the "experts" called to testify answer it yes or no?
Because it depends
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He has to answer yes or no on this bill. Why can't the "experts" called to testify answer it yes or no?
Did you listen? There is no "depends" in this bill. Yes or no - unfettered abortions up until the time of birth.Because it depends
Just look what happened when senators had to answer yes or no to the Authorization to use Military force in Iraq.He has to answer yes or no on this bill. Why can't the "experts" called to testify answer it yes or no?
That's how we got into trouble with the Authorization to use Force in Iraq.Did you listen? There is no "depends" in this bill. Yes or no - unfettered abortions up until the time of birth.
Wrong, the life of the mother is an exception in every State. That will naturally include a Dr. opinion.All the one's that don't include exceptions. Or whose exceptions aren't clearly defined.
It cited the example of a pregnant woman with stage 3 melanoma who was denied both abortion care and cancer treatment because clinicians couldn’t confirm whether the law’s life of the mother exception applied.Wrong, the life of the mother is an exception in every State. That will naturally include a Dr. opinion.
Providers challenging the ban argue that this language doesn’t permit abortion care when the condition is “substantial but reversible,” “less than substantial but irreversible,” or both “substantial and irreversible” but not considered “major.” Their lawsuit questions how doctors are expected to navigate this type of confusion.Wrong, the life of the mother is an exception in every State. That will naturally include a Dr. opinion.
What 'condition?' What is 'abortion care?' The rest of your post makes no sense. Either the mother's life is at risk from giving birth or it isn't.Providers challenging the ban argue that this language doesn’t permit abortion care when the condition is “substantial but reversible,” “less than substantial but irreversible,” or both “substantial and irreversible” but not considered “major.” Their lawsuit questions how doctors are expected to navigate this type of confusion.