Serious question - is an $850K "settlement" more credible evidence than a 40 year old accusation???

[Thinker101]

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

so all theses women lied about the child molester?

there is nothing to test.... there is no lawsuit.

as soon as roy the creep sues for defamation, he'll have the right to discovery.

Well, testing the yearbook would certainly clear up a lot of confusion.

there isn't any confusion. there are trumptards defending a child molester

if the child molester wanted it tested, he'd have sued for defamation like he said he would.

still waiting for that law suit.

hint: it will arrive when trump's suit against the women he sexually attacked is filed.

like never

So if you feel these women did not lie, how about all the women that are accusing Franken.

and is taking a stupid picture the same as molesting underage girls?

is it the same as grabbing women by the pussy?

one of these things is not like the others. it doesn't take disbelief to see that. and mischaracterizing them as the same is insulting to women.

Seriously!!! There's 4-5 women accusing Franken.

 

[Thinker101]

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

I'm sure you have a link to the yearbook being tested and confirmed....if you don't then you can stop the BS.

 

[Faun]

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

I'm sure you have a link to the yearbook being tested and confirmed....if you don't then you can stop the BS.

No one needs to prove you wrong when you can't prove yourself right. You're the one who insinuated that Allred accepted a fabricated yearbook. The onus to prove that falls upon you and you don't get to pivot that to others. I asked you what evidence you had to support that and so far, you've offered nothing.

 

[Thinker101]

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

I'm sure you have a link to the yearbook being tested and confirmed....if you don't then you can stop the BS.

No one needs to prove you wrong when you can't prove yourself right. You're the one who insinuated that Allred accepted a fabricated yearbook. The onus to prove that falls upon you and you don't get to pivot that to others. I asked you what evidence you had to support that and so far, you've offered nothing.

No one needs to prove you wrong when you can't prove yourself right....WTF kind of stupid talk is that.

 

[Faun]

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

I'm sure you have a link to the yearbook being tested and confirmed....if you don't then you can stop the BS.

No one needs to prove you wrong when you can't prove yourself right. You're the one who insinuated that Allred accepted a fabricated yearbook. The onus to prove that falls upon you and you don't get to pivot that to others. I asked you what evidence you had to support that and so far, you've offered nothing.

No one needs to prove you wrong when you can't prove yourself right....WTF kind of stupid talk is that.

Damn, you're not even bright enough to comprehend burden of proof.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

just interested to see what everybody else thinks...

You mean the $850,000 settlement Bill Clinton paid to settle a case that was dismissed with prejudice, meaning that Jones had to pay his legal fees and could not refile? The case the judge said was totally without merit?

Clinton settled the case to end an appeal because he was about to face an impeachment trial.

No. The case was under appeal. Get your facts straight!

You get your facts straight. The case was dismissed with prejudice. The judge all but labelled it “malicious prosecution”, which it was. The dismissal was under appeal because that was the only way of keeping it alive because they could not refile.

I am sure you don't have a link to that, or you wouldn't be trying to hard to hide it.

 

[Thinker101]

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

I'm sure you have a link to the yearbook being tested and confirmed....if you don't then you can stop the BS.

No one needs to prove you wrong when you can't prove yourself right. You're the one who insinuated that Allred accepted a fabricated yearbook. The onus to prove that falls upon you and you don't get to pivot that to others. I asked you what evidence you had to support that and so far, you've offered nothing.

No one needs to prove you wrong when you can't prove yourself right....WTF kind of stupid talk is that.

Damn, you're not even bright enough to comprehend burden of proof.

So much for innocent until proven guilty...dumbass.

 

[whitehall]

A settlement is an admission isn't it? It's a shame that taxpayers have to pay for it.

 

[Dragonlady]

just interested to see what everybody else thinks...

You mean the $850,000 settlement Bill Clinton paid to settle a case that was dismissed with prejudice, meaning that Jones had to pay his legal fees and could not refile? The case the judge said was totally without merit?

Clinton settled the case to end an appeal because he was about to face an impeachment trial.

No. The case was under appeal. Get your facts straight!

You get your facts straight. The case was dismissed with prejudice. The judge all but labelled it “malicious prosecution”, which it was. The dismissal was under appeal because that was the only way of keeping it alive because they could not refile.

I am sure you don't have a link to that, or you wouldn't be trying to hard to hide it.

Since you’re too lazy use google:

Paula Jones - Wikipedia

Paula Jones Case Is Dismissed; Judge Says Even If Tale Is True, Incident Was Not Harassment

washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

Lazy, right wing and stupid is no way to go through life.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

just interested to see what everybody else thinks...

You mean the $850,000 settlement Bill Clinton paid to settle a case that was dismissed with prejudice, meaning that Jones had to pay his legal fees and could not refile? The case the judge said was totally without merit?

Clinton settled the case to end an appeal because he was about to face an impeachment trial.

No. The case was under appeal. Get your facts straight!

You get your facts straight. The case was dismissed with prejudice. The judge all but labelled it “malicious prosecution”, which it was. The dismissal was under appeal because that was the only way of keeping it alive because they could not refile.

I am sure you don't have a link to that, or you wouldn't be trying to hard to hide it.

Since you’re too lazy use google:

Paula Jones - Wikipedia

Paula Jones Case Is Dismissed; Judge Says Even If Tale Is True, Incident Was Not Harassment

washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

Lazy, right wing and stupid is no way to go through life.

No, you were the one too lazy to provide a link.

Now, where do those links back up the "dismissed with prejudice" claim you made?

They do not. The case was appealed.

Also, when the appeal was heard, it appeared two members of the three judge panel were sympathetic.

Having been trained on the subject of what is and what is not sexual harassment as the result of the Tailhook incident and many years of training by various schools systems, the judge in that case was blatantly wrong and would have been overturned on appeal.

What do you have to say for the fact that Jones sued for $700,000 but Clinton agreed to pay her $850,000? They wanted it to go away as quickly as possible before he was dragged through the mud of a trial in addition to his impeachment proceedings.

 

[Faun]

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

I'm sure you have a link to the yearbook being tested and confirmed....if you don't then you can stop the BS.

No one needs to prove you wrong when you can't prove yourself right. You're the one who insinuated that Allred accepted a fabricated yearbook. The onus to prove that falls upon you and you don't get to pivot that to others. I asked you what evidence you had to support that and so far, you've offered nothing.

No one needs to prove you wrong when you can't prove yourself right....WTF kind of stupid talk is that.

Damn, you're not even bright enough to comprehend burden of proof.

So much for innocent until proven guilty...dumbass.

You made a claim you can’t back up, I get it.

As far as prusumption of innocence, that is a theory which extends no further than our justice system; from which these accusations are excluded.

 

[Faun]

A settlement is an admission isn't it? It's a shame that taxpayers have to pay for it.

No, a settlement is not an admission. And how did tax payers pay for it?

 

[Faun]

You mean the $850,000 settlement Bill Clinton paid to settle a case that was dismissed with prejudice, meaning that Jones had to pay his legal fees and could not refile? The case the judge said was totally without merit?

Clinton settled the case to end an appeal because he was about to face an impeachment trial.

No. The case was under appeal. Get your facts straight!

You get your facts straight. The case was dismissed with prejudice. The judge all but labelled it “malicious prosecution”, which it was. The dismissal was under appeal because that was the only way of keeping it alive because they could not refile.

I am sure you don't have a link to that, or you wouldn't be trying to hard to hide it.

Since you’re too lazy use google:

Paula Jones - Wikipedia

Paula Jones Case Is Dismissed; Judge Says Even If Tale Is True, Incident Was Not Harassment

washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

Lazy, right wing and stupid is no way to go through life.

No, you were the one too lazy to provide a link.

Now, where do those links back up the "dismissed with prejudice" claim you made?

They do not. The case was appealed.

Also, when the appeal was heard, it appeared two members of the three judge panel were sympathetic.

Having been trained on the subject of what is and what is not sexual harassment as the result of the Tailhook incident and many years of training by various schools systems, the judge in that case was blatantly wrong and would have been overturned on appeal.

What do you have to say for the fact that Jones sued for $700,000 but Clinton agreed to pay her $850,000? They wanted it to go away as quickly as possible before he was dragged through the mud of a trial in addition to his impeachment proceedings.

Wrong, the dismissal was appealed, not the case. The appellate court never ruled because Clinton and Jones settled out of court.

And of course he wanted it to go away. It was deemed meritless in a court of law.

 

[Dragonlady]

You mean the $850,000 settlement Bill Clinton paid to settle a case that was dismissed with prejudice, meaning that Jones had to pay his legal fees and could not refile? The case the judge said was totally without merit?

Clinton settled the case to end an appeal because he was about to face an impeachment trial.

No. The case was under appeal. Get your facts straight!

You get your facts straight. The case was dismissed with prejudice. The judge all but labelled it “malicious prosecution”, which it was. The dismissal was under appeal because that was the only way of keeping it alive because they could not refile.

I am sure you don't have a link to that, or you wouldn't be trying to hard to hide it.

Since you’re too lazy use google:

Paula Jones - Wikipedia

Paula Jones Case Is Dismissed; Judge Says Even If Tale Is True, Incident Was Not Harassment

washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

Lazy, right wing and stupid is no way to go through life.

No, you were the one too lazy to provide a link.

Now, where do those links back up the "dismissed with prejudice" claim you made?

They do not. The case was appealed.

Also, when the appeal was heard, it appeared two members of the three judge panel were sympathetic.

Having been trained on the subject of what is and what is not sexual harassment as the result of the Tailhook incident and many years of training by various schools systems, the judge in that case was blatantly wrong and would have been overturned on appeal.

What do you have to say for the fact that Jones sued for $700,000 but Clinton agreed to pay her $850,000? They wanted it to go away as quickly as possible before he was dragged through the mud of a trial in addition to his impeachment proceedings.

You didn’t even bother to read the links. Both the Wikipedia link and the second link said the case was dismissed with prejudice and the judge said it was without merit.

No appeal was ever heard, only filed. So that part of your post was a complete fabrication.

 

[Care4all]

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

I'm sure you have a link to the yearbook being tested and confirmed....if you don't then you can stop the BS.

Nope, it's up to you to prove it is not real at this point and we KNOW it is his handwriting in both the year book and the graduation Card, and we know it is his signature and we now also know, he was in the habit of writing notes to the girls he met.

It is Roy Moore that is lying, when he says he does not know one of these women... people don't lie, unless they have something to HIDE....

And maybe now at 70 years old and looking back on it, he realizes it was wrong and predatory for him to hang out and pursue teens in high school when he was in his mid thirties and he is embarrassed about it so he is denying it.... I dunno why he is lying....but for his own personal gain by doing such...like getting elected as a US Senator....?

 

[Thinker101]

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

I'm sure you have a link to the yearbook being tested and confirmed....if you don't then you can stop the BS.

Nope, it's up to you to prove it is not real at this point and we KNOW it is his handwriting in both the year book and the graduation Card, and we know it is his signature and we now also know, he was in the habit of writing notes to the girls he met.

It is Roy Moore that is lying, when he says he does not know one of these women... people don't lie, unless they have something to HIDE....

And maybe now at 70 years old and looking back on it, he realizes it was wrong and predatory for him to hang out and pursue teens in high school when he was in his mid thirties and he is embarrassed about it so he is denying it.... I dunno why he is lying....but for his own personal gain by doing such...like getting elected as a US Senator....?

What a surprise.

Gloria Allred won't allow inspection of yearbook

 

[Kondor3]

...I will stand by an alleged child molestor before any confirmed liberal Democrat!

Saved for public scrutiny and future reference. God forgive you. America will not.

Reported. That is not a quote of what I said.

...I will stand by an alleged child molestor before any confirmed liberal Democrat!

Saved for public scrutiny and future reference. God forgive you. America will not.

Reported. That is not a quote of what I said.

Report away. That is EXACTLY what you said. It's still online, for all to see. Next batter, please....

 

[g5000]

just interested to see what everybody else thinks...

You mean like Blake Farenthold using taxpayer money to pay off his victim? Credible like that?

 

[g5000]

...I will stand by an alleged child molestor before any confirmed liberal Democrat!

Saved for public scrutiny and future reference. God forgive you. America will not.

Reported. That is not a quote of what I said.

...I will stand by an alleged child molestor before any confirmed liberal Democrat!

Saved for public scrutiny and future reference. God forgive you. America will not.

Reported. That is not a quote of what I said.

Report away. That is EXACTLY what you said. It's still online, for all to see. Next batter, please....

Post the fucking post number asshole! I did not post that!

You said it right here, scumbag: Serious question - is an $850K "settlement" more credible evidence than a 40 year old accusation???

 

[Kondor3]

...I will stand by an alleged child molestor before any confirmed liberal Democrat!

Saved for public scrutiny and future reference. God forgive you. America will not.

Reported. That is not a quote of what I said.

...I will stand by an alleged child molestor before any confirmed liberal Democrat!

Saved for public scrutiny and future reference. God forgive you. America will not.

Reported. That is not a quote of what I said.

Report away. That is EXACTLY what you said. It's still online, for all to see. Next batter, please....

Yeppers... you said it alright... although I see you took down your post denying it, just now, didn't you?

Like I said... report away... have a field day with it... the Mods can check their logs and decide for themselves.

What you said sounds pretty damned terrible, on second thought, doesn't it?

Blind partisan Kool-Aid drinking will do that to ya, every time, when it catches up with you.

You have now publicly declared for all to see that you put Party above honor and integrity and the safety of children.

My condolences.

There is one way out; namely, to publicly declare that you were wrong, that things had become heated, that you misspoke, and are sorry.

Fail to do that and you stand with Moore (saddled with all the degenerate filth which that implies) forevermore.

You still have a 'moment' before you get locked into that.

Character Test Time.

The decision is yours.