Serious question - is an $850K "settlement" more credible evidence than a 40 year old accusation???

[jillian]

the yearbook has NOT been proven a forgery.

if you do a simple fact check, you'll find that the mall manager said that they did not retain records from that time.

anything else you'd like to lie about"?

immoral hack who voted for the orange sexual predator and supports the child molester roy Moore really shouldn't talk about principles. you have none.

Imagine that...has Allred released the yearbook?

Why should she?

So it can be tested...what kind of fricken question is that.

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

so all theses women lied about the child molester?

there is nothing to test.... there is no lawsuit.

as soon as roy the creep sues for defamation, he'll have the right to discovery.

 

[Faun]

just interested to see what everybody else thinks...

That's the wrong comparison. The actual comparison is a 40 year old accusation compared to a case thrown out of court due to lack of merit. The settlement was just to make her go away after her accusation proved false in court.

so basically, she was paid money to shut the hell up and quit bitching about being raped since her rapist was a powerful person

thanks for clearing that up

She lost in court.

Bullshit. The judgement was against Clinton.

He got Paula Jones alone in a hotel room, propositioned her and pulled out his erect penis which she described as a mere 5 inches long, as thin as a roll of quarters and bent at the end (presumably to the left).

Paula Jones won the case and was awarded $850,000, which is much more than she originally sued for in the first place. Clinton was also fined $90,000 because he lied under oath.

LOL

There was never a judgement against Clinton in that case. The case was dismissed due to lack of merit. That’s a judgement against Jones, not Clinton. She filed an appeal and before the appeals court rendered a decision, she and Clinton settled out court to make it go away.

 

[Faun]

...I will stand by an alleged child molestor before any confirmed liberal Democrat!

Saved for public scrutiny and future reference. God forgive you. America will not.

Reported. That is not a quote of what I said.

That’s exactly what you said.

 

[Ame®icano]

The settlement was to stop the circus, to stop the lost in court lawsuit, from appealing the loss, and dragging it on for another 5 years....it also was not his personal money, but his legal defence fund that paid out to settle, so he personally was not hit in the pocket....if that matters any?

That's one way to put it. The other one, the settlement is to keep victims silent and pervs in the office.

I'd like to see what were the actual accusations that had to be settled.

 

[Ame®icano]

Was Trump's 25 million dollar settlement for Trump U 29 times more credible than an 850,000 dollar settlement?

That is good comparison, with one exception: We know what Trump U was accused for.

Do we know what Congressional settlements were about?

 

[Columbo]

So what crime did the 16 year old accuse him of?

Nothing.

Attempted sexual assault.

Nope. Try again.

Read up and then post. If you don't want to follow the case then don't comment.

You obviously have not followed the case, nor do you know anything about our system of justice.

I know the case and we aren't in a courtroom.

 

[Columbo]

So what crime did the 16 year old accuse him of?

Nothing.

Attempted sexual assault.

Where is the evidence? Oops! Somebody forgot that little detail because it happened about 4 decades ago!

Time makes no difference. The "evidence" would have been the same.

 

[Thinker101]

Imagine that...has Allred released the yearbook?

Why should she?

So it can be tested...what kind of fricken question is that.

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

 

[Thinker101]

Imagine that...has Allred released the yearbook?

Why should she?

So it can be tested...what kind of fricken question is that.

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

so all theses women lied about the child molester?

there is nothing to test.... there is no lawsuit.

as soon as roy the creep sues for defamation, he'll have the right to discovery.

Well, testing the yearbook would certainly clear up a lot of confusion.

 

[jillian]

Why should she?

So it can be tested...what kind of fricken question is that.

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

so all theses women lied about the child molester?

there is nothing to test.... there is no lawsuit.

as soon as roy the creep sues for defamation, he'll have the right to discovery.

Well, testing the yearbook would certainly clear up a lot of confusion.

there isn't any confusion. there are trumptards defending a child molester

if the child molester wanted it tested, he'd have sued for defamation like he said he would.

still waiting for that law suit.

hint: it will arrive when trump's suit against the women he sexually attacked is filed.

like never

 

[Faun]

The settlement was to stop the circus, to stop the lost in court lawsuit, from appealing the loss, and dragging it on for another 5 years....it also was not his personal money, but his legal defence fund that paid out to settle, so he personally was not hit in the pocket....if that matters any?

That's one way to put it. The other one, the settlement is to keep victims silent and pervs in the office.

I'd like to see what were the actual accusations that had to be settled.

If that were Clinton's intentions, he would have settled with her out of court before it ever went to trial.

 

[Faun]

Why should she?

So it can be tested...what kind of fricken question is that.

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

 

[Thinker101]

So it can be tested...what kind of fricken question is that.

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

so all theses women lied about the child molester?

there is nothing to test.... there is no lawsuit.

as soon as roy the creep sues for defamation, he'll have the right to discovery.

Well, testing the yearbook would certainly clear up a lot of confusion.

there isn't any confusion. there are trumptards defending a child molester

if the child molester wanted it tested, he'd have sued for defamation like he said he would.

still waiting for that law suit.

hint: it will arrive when trump's suit against the women he sexually attacked is filed.

like never

So if you feel these women did not lie, how about all the women that are accusing Franken.

 

[Thinker101]

So it can be tested...what kind of fricken question is that.

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

As a reputable lawyer, her job is to make sure none of the so called evidence is fabricated.

 

[jillian]

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

so all theses women lied about the child molester?

there is nothing to test.... there is no lawsuit.

as soon as roy the creep sues for defamation, he'll have the right to discovery.

Well, testing the yearbook would certainly clear up a lot of confusion.

there isn't any confusion. there are trumptards defending a child molester

if the child molester wanted it tested, he'd have sued for defamation like he said he would.

still waiting for that law suit.

hint: it will arrive when trump's suit against the women he sexually attacked is filed.

like never

So if you feel these women did not lie, how about all the women that are accusing Franken.

and is taking a stupid picture the same as molesting underage girls?

is it the same as grabbing women by the pussy?

one of these things is not like the others. it doesn't take disbelief to see that. and mischaracterizing them as the same is insulting to women.

 

[Faun]

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

As a reputable lawyer, her job is to make sure none of the so called evidence is fabricated.

Your evidence she didn't do that ... is ... ?

 

[jillian]

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

As a reputable lawyer, her job is to make sure none of the so called evidence is fabricated.

Your evidence she didn't do that ... is ... ?

the voices in his head.

it is not her job to get a handwriting analysis. it is her job to have a good faith belief that she is not suborning perjury.

if the child molester thinks it's fake he would start a law suit for defamation.

still waiting for that one.

any day now.....

 

[Care4all]

So it can be tested...what kind of fricken question is that.

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

 

[Dragonlady]

just interested to see what everybody else thinks...

You mean the $850,000 settlement Bill Clinton paid to settle a case that was dismissed with prejudice, meaning that Jones had to pay his legal fees and could not refile? The case the judge said was totally without merit?

Clinton settled the case to end an appeal because he was about to face an impeachment trial.

No. The case was under appeal. Get your facts straight!

You get your facts straight. The case was dismissed with prejudice. The judge all but labelled it “malicious prosecution”, which it was. The dismissal was under appeal because that was the only way of keeping it alive because they could not refile.

 

[Columbo]

What’s the point in testing it? No matter what it would show, you yahoo’s would be crying, fake, anyway. No doubt Allred has learned after watching rightards bitch about every pixel on Obama’s birth certificate. Twice.

And yahoos on the other side simply take it as fact.

It should be tested because many of us are NOT yahoos and are actually interested in truth. Weird, right.

Nope, we’ve been through that circus with Obama over his birth certificate. As an attorney, she’d be crazy to put her client through that.

Wow, who the hell needs the truth....yahoo number one.

As a lawyer, her job is to look out for her client, not throw her to the wolves who salivate over that yearbook like it's Obama's birth certificate.

Well, the yearbook writing from Moore was CONFIRMED yesterday, so everyone else on the Moore side have been lying and promoting a lie about the then 16 yr old victim with the yearbook.

One of the ladies that came out and said she dated Moore when she was in high school and was 17 yrs old at the time, (he was 34) and was looking at her yearbook and out came a Graduation card that Moore had sent her when she had graduated from high school, and inside the card was a message from Roy Moore and the script and the style of the message matched perfectly with the Yr Book Lady's yearbook message from him....BTW this came from one of the ladies that said he was basically a gentleman to her.......and even after high school ...and they were not dating, she went on to work on a couple of his campaigns....

When the card fell out and she saw the distinct handwriting and message, is the moment she TURNED, and then believed "the Women" accusing him, because she knew at that moment, that Roy Moore was LYING about the yearbook and yearbook woman.

The pattern is very clear, Moore is and has always been a creep.