Shooting in VA park, Steve scalise shot

maybe now they'll pass a couple of laws keeping guns away from crazy people

Yo stupid, guns are already outlawed in DC....
Nope....not true at all.
You don't remember District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

You are spewing idiocy, as always;

{
In Washington, D.C., all firearms must be registered with the police, by the terms of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975.

The same law also prohibited the possession of handguns, even in private citizens' own homes, unless they were registered before 1976. However, the handgun ban was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller. The Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment acknowledges and guarantees the right of the individual to possess and carry firearms, and therefore D.C.'s ban on handguns was unconstitutional.[9]

Following the Heller decision, the Council of the District of Columbia enacted a set of rules regulating the possession of handguns and long guns in citizens' homes. Reductions were made to the DC laws in 2012 and 2015 under threat of lawsuits from gun owners and prospective gun owners.[10] On September 18, 2015, a federal appeals court struck down some parts of the District's gun registration law as unconstitutional, while upholding other parts of the law.[11][12]

In addition to each firearm being registered with the police, the rules require that D.C. residents undergo an NCIC background check and submit to fingerprinting. The firearms registry photographs the applicant. Residents must take an online gun safety course. Residents must also declare at what address it will be kept. There is a 10-day waiting period from purchase of firearm to possession, and a 30-day period between purchases of successive handguns. Each firearm is registered to an individual only, meaning couples who wish to own firearms must purchase two separate firearms. Handgun registrants must be at least 21 years old. Long gun registration is allowed for persons 18–21 years of age with a NCIC qualified adult co-registering. Handgun models are limited to any handgun appearing on any one of the California, Massachusetts, Maryland or DC Police "approved rosters" by make/model. Long guns are controlled by an allowed/not-allowed attributes list. Non residents, with a place of business in DC may register a firearm to be maintained at that place of business.[13][14][15]}

Gun laws in the District of Columbia - Wikipedia
Are guns banned in D.C. as was claimed? Are you aware that words like "banned" have specific meanings......and they do NOT mean the same thing as "registered"?

When it takes 6 months or so and $600 in fees to "register" a gun, like a revolver in NYC what you have is a de facto ban, if not de jure.
 

WRONG & stupid rumor mongering of a partisan jerk.

What do we know? A person who should not have had a gun, had one and used it to harm others. The only political aspect of this incident is this, too many guns are in the possession of too many people who should not have a gun in their possession.

If fingers need to be pointed, point them at the NRA and its policy of no gun control ever!

You don't yet know whether the shooter should have legally been prevented from having a firearm.


I don't want to try to find wrycatchers post....so I will go from your link to it...

There are 8 million of these rifles in American hands.......one was used today to do this shooting.....

8,000,000 to 1


And these rifles in have been used to murder 167 people....in 34 years.....

knives are used to murder over 1,500 people every single year....

The anti-gunners want these guns banned...even though they have no facts or statistics to back up their fear....

Orlando is a good reason. Even with armed security so many dead. Nobody should have a mass killing gun legally.
What's a "mass killing gun"? shit face

High capacity semi autos. See Orlando shooting for mass killing.
 
WRONG & stupid rumor mongering of a partisan jerk.

What do we know? A person who should not have had a gun, had one and used it to harm others. The only political aspect of this incident is this, too many guns are in the possession of too many people who should not have a gun in their possession.

If fingers need to be pointed, point them at the NRA and its policy of no gun control ever!

You don't yet know whether the shooter should have legally been prevented from having a firearm.


I don't want to try to find wrycatchers post....so I will go from your link to it...

There are 8 million of these rifles in American hands.......one was used today to do this shooting.....

8,000,000 to 1


And these rifles in have been used to murder 167 people....in 34 years.....

knives are used to murder over 1,500 people every single year....

The anti-gunners want these guns banned...even though they have no facts or statistics to back up their fear....

So the Brits would be better off had their last terrorist attackers had assault rifles instead of knives...

interesting.
Shit for brains, terrorists much prefer bombs/cars and such over firearms for their killing... lol

Guns have been used plenty when they are available.
The Fact remains they much prefer bombs/cars and such... they don't need firearms to kill people. Shit for brains
 
This is the Left in America today: Promoters of an Intolerant and Violent ideology which treats those who hold different viewpoints as deserving of execution and damnation.

It's not good when a political movement becomes a Religion - but that is exactly what has happened to the Dem-Prog-Green-Identity Politics coalition.

The biggest threat to our Republic is today's Left.
What is the threat? What scares you?
 
The shooter was driven by the constant hate streaming from democrats. Of course the play depicting the assassination of the president was part of that. The shooter wanted to kill as many republicans as possible. That's pretty clear. The leftists on twitter has already started to praise the man. By the end of the day he will be a martyr to the leftist cause.
 
a. Link to support your claim.

b. YOu just used a phrase the implies that the person who was wronged after doing wrong had it coming. Combined with your accusation that Trump called for violence FIRST, your words were taking the blame off the shooter and putting it on Trump.
maybe you took it that way but I for 1 abhor violence While people maybe even I, shoot our mouths off I'm sure bloodshed is not what we want...



Words have meaning, and you lefties are far to comfortable with just saying what ever it takes in that moment to smear your enemies without any thought as to whether it is accurate or what effects it has on people.
Well MAYBE it didn't come out like it should have BUT your president must bear some responsibility as he has promoted violence and maybe HE didn't have a thought as to how his loyal subjects would take it



Except that he hasn't.

And by making an excuse(s) for the shooter, YOU are promoting violence.


Also, with your attack in his supporters you are demonstrating the thinking that almost certainly was used by this shooter to justify, in his mind, attacking republican congressmen.
Correll I won't argue the points with you again but my feeling is you have a mean rotten vindictive man in our WH and sometimes that brings out the worst in people and BTW I think it's too bad the gunman wasn't killed so you can get on me for that too

The shooter as the victim.

Typical
 
maybe now they'll pass a couple of laws keeping guns away from crazy people
It's already illegal for "crazy people" to have guns. What new laws would you like to see?

House votes to overturn Obama gun rule

And?

DC has the strictest anti-gun laws in the nation, yet clearly they did nothing. How will attacking the civil rights of the average citizen do more? Even if you disarm the peasants, what will keep a motivated democrat from getting in a van and mowing people down?

Assigning culpability for acts to inanimate objects is utterly insane.

Further, given that the shooter specifically targeted Republicans, it is almost certain that he is a democrat and anti-gun rights.
You claimed that guns were banned in D.C.
 

Okay thanks, that's who Steve Scalise is, I agree with Steve McGarrett it's probably going to be Antifa human filth.

The Leftist Maniacs have been getting more violent, whipped up by the Professional Leftist Agitators.

One word - pizzagate. I hope everyone survives.


Weren't you calling for white genocide just yesterday?

Ah, no.
 
The shooter was driven by the constant hate streaming from democrats. Of course the play depicting the assassination of the president was part of that. The shooter wanted to kill as many republicans as possible. That's pretty clear. The leftists on twitter has already started to praise the man. By the end of the day he will be a martyr to the leftist cause.
You know him?
 
This is the Left in America today: Promoters of an Intolerant and Violent ideology which treats those who hold different viewpoints as deserving of execution and damnation.

It's no wonder the Left is in bed with Islam.
 
Was she charged with a crime, NO.

ummm, can't you read? Comey said he was not recommending Hillary be indicted because she was too stupid to know she was breaking the law.

(BYW, evidently snowflakes aren't too bright because they seem to be unaware that ignorance of the law is not a legally acceptable defense for committing a crime. You would think such an experienced former Prosecuting Attorney like Comey would know that.)
 
Following the barbaric shooting aimed at Republicans this morning in Alexandria, Virginia, Senator Rand Paul, who was at the scene, praised Capitol Police for preventing hundreds of deaths by promptly responding and taking out the gunman, whom it appears was an unhinged leftist.

Rand Paul: Armed Capitol Police Prevented A “Massacre”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well imagine that the police were armed oh but that is authority and the lefties aren't ever afraid of police having guns after all cops are immune from going nuts , or ever going on a shooting spree.
 
maybe now they'll pass a couple of laws keeping guns away from crazy people
It's already illegal for "crazy people" to have guns. What new laws would you like to see?

House votes to overturn Obama gun rule

And?

DC has the strictest anti-gun laws in the nation, yet clearly they did nothing. How will attacking the civil rights of the average citizen do more? Even if you disarm the peasants, what will keep a motivated democrat from getting in a van and mowing people down?

Assigning culpability for acts to inanimate objects is utterly insane.

Further, given that the shooter specifically targeted Republicans, it is almost certain that he is a democrat and anti-gun rights.

Can't be, they are scared of guns.
 
The shooter was driven by the constant hate streaming from democrats. Of course the play depicting the assassination of the president was part of that. The shooter wanted to kill as many republicans as possible. That's pretty clear. The leftists on twitter has already started to praise the man. By the end of the day he will be a martyr to the leftist cause.
You know him?
Probably friends
 
Shooter asked if the people were Republicans before launching his attack.
someone that someone else believed to be the shooter asked that question ..the man however was carrying no weapon
Next thing you will be doing is calling for assassinations of cops too.

Oh wait, you already did that.

How many cops has The Democrat Party killed this year?

61 so far by my count.

The party kills cops? Ah, no.
 
The shooter was driven by the constant hate streaming from democrats. Of course the play depicting the assassination of the president was part of that. The shooter wanted to kill as many republicans as possible. That's pretty clear. The leftists on twitter has already started to praise the man. By the end of the day he will be a martyr to the leftist cause.
You know him?
That's just what's being reported so far.
 
WRONG & stupid rumor mongering of a partisan jerk.

What do we know? A person who should not have had a gun, had one and used it to harm others. The only political aspect of this incident is this, too many guns are in the possession of too many people who should not have a gun in their possession.

If fingers need to be pointed, point them at the NRA and its policy of no gun control ever!

You don't yet know whether the shooter should have legally been prevented from having a firearm.


I don't want to try to find wrycatchers post....so I will go from your link to it...

There are 8 million of these rifles in American hands.......one was used today to do this shooting.....

8,000,000 to 1


And these rifles in have been used to murder 167 people....in 34 years.....

knives are used to murder over 1,500 people every single year....

The anti-gunners want these guns banned...even though they have no facts or statistics to back up their fear....

Orlando is a good reason. Even with armed security so many dead. Nobody should have a mass killing gun legally.
What's a "mass killing gun"? shit face

Hi capacity semi autos. See Orlando shooting for mass killing.
Orlando was just a sporting rifle, you can buy them right over the counter.
Please educate yourself you sound like a fucking moron, "high-capacity semi autos":lmao: … You do realize that is not used by the military.

Not only are progressives the second most intolerant of groups behind muslims, they are the most uneducated when it comes to firearms.
 
You don't yet know whether the shooter should have legally been prevented from having a firearm.


I don't want to try to find wrycatchers post....so I will go from your link to it...

There are 8 million of these rifles in American hands.......one was used today to do this shooting.....

8,000,000 to 1


And these rifles in have been used to murder 167 people....in 34 years.....

knives are used to murder over 1,500 people every single year....

The anti-gunners want these guns banned...even though they have no facts or statistics to back up their fear....

So the Brits would be better off had their last terrorist attackers had assault rifles instead of knives...

interesting.
Shit for brains, terrorists much prefer bombs/cars and such over firearms for their killing... lol

Guns have been used plenty when they are available.
The Fact remains they much prefer bombs/cars and such... they don't need firearms to kill people. Shit for brains

And yet it sure killed a lot at Orlando.
 
a. Link to support your claim.

b. YOu just used a phrase the implies that the person who was wronged after doing wrong had it coming. Combined with your accusation that Trump called for violence FIRST, your words were taking the blame off the shooter and putting it on Trump.
maybe you took it that way but I for 1 abhor violence While people maybe even I, shoot our mouths off I'm sure bloodshed is not what we want...



Words have meaning, and you lefties are far to comfortable with just saying what ever it takes in that moment to smear your enemies without any thought as to whether it is accurate or what effects it has on people.
Well MAYBE it didn't come out like it should have BUT your president must bear some responsibility as he has promoted violence and maybe HE didn't have a thought as to how his loyal subjects would take it



Except that he hasn't.

And by making an excuse(s) for the shooter, YOU are promoting violence.


Also, with your attack in his supporters you are demonstrating the thinking that almost certainly was used by this shooter to justify, in his mind, attacking republican congressmen.
Correll I won't argue the points with you again but my feeling is you have a mean rotten vindictive man in our WH and sometimes that brings out the worst in people ...


It is very likely that this shooter picked up the same world view from the same sources as you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top