Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings?

Should places of worship be required to hold gay weddings

  • Yes, Denmark does it, the Scandinavians are enlightened

    Votes: 17 7.0%
  • No, I THOUGHT this was AMERICA

    Votes: 198 81.8%
  • You are a baby brains without a formed opinion

    Votes: 5 2.1%
  • Other, explain

    Votes: 22 9.1%

  • Total voters
    242
Nope. The 14th amendment only mandates equal protection of the laws. It prevents the government from discriminating, not private citizens.

Unless they are involved in Interstate Commerce, or run public businesses. Of course churches are not businesses, and cannot be forced to violate their faith, a moot point.

The 14th does prevent citizens in public business from discriminating.

Tough that, bripat.

Not even the Supreme Court has ruled that way, diaper lord.

As always, you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
 
Of course the federal government has such a role enforcing nondiscrimination in accordance with the 14th amendment.

Nope. The 14th amendment only mandates equal protection of the laws. It prevents the government from discriminating, not private citizens.

Unless they are involved in Interstate Commerce, or run public businesses. Of course churches are not businesses, and cannot be forced to violate their faith, a moot point.

The interstate commerce justification by the SC is a load of horsecrap. When written, interstate commerce did not mean any kind of business activity whatsoever. It referred only the the transportation and exchange of goods across state lines. It gave the federal government the authority only to regulate those activities.
 
The statist here is kg who wants to use big government to enforce her moral beliefs.

Won't happen, sis.
 
Judgment Day's a-comin'...

For the Homosexual Mafia, it begins January 20, 2017...

You hetero-sexuals are going to be amazed to have the rest of America standing on your face that day.
Given that a minimum of 97% of America is heterosexual, that doesn't sound very intimidating... :rolleyes:

Please continue to think in those terms... arrogance and hubris on your part will work in favor of the rest of us, once the window of opportunity opens once again, for some fancy legal juggling and footwork.
 
Last edited:
Unless they are involved in Interstate Commerce, or run public businesses. Of course churches are not businesses, and cannot be forced to violate their faith, a moot point.

The 14th does prevent citizens in public business from discriminating.

Tough that, bripat.

Not even the Supreme Court has ruled that way, diaper lord.

As always, you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

You don't know what you are talking about. You don't get to discriminate in public service.
 
Nope. The 14th amendment only mandates equal protection of the laws. It prevents the government from discriminating, not private citizens.

Unless they are involved in Interstate Commerce, or run public businesses. Of course churches are not businesses, and cannot be forced to violate their faith, a moot point.

The interstate commerce justification by the SC is a load of horsecrap. When written, interstate commerce did not mean any kind of business activity whatsoever. It referred only the the transportation and exchange of goods across state lines. It gave the federal government the authority only to regulate those activities.

Your opinion and 50 cents won't even buy a cup of coffee.

No one is concerned about an uninformed anarcho-commie's opinion.
 
Judgment Day's a-comin'...

For the Homosexual Mafia, it begins January 20, 2017...

You hetero-sexuals are going to be amazed to have the rest of America standing on your face that day.
Given that a minimum of 97% of America is heterosexual, that doesn't sound very intimidating... :rolleyes:

Please continue to think in those terms... arrogance and hubris on your part will work in favor of the rest of us, once the window of opportunity opens once again, for some fancy legal juggling and footwork.

Yes, your arrogance and hubris is setting you and the failures like you up for a big fall.

Most heterosexuals support marriage equality

You freak false Christians of the far right no longer get to dictate what other people do in their lives. Tough that. :lol:
 
You hetero-sexuals are going to be amazed to have the rest of America standing on your face that day.
Given that a minimum of 97% of America is heterosexual, that doesn't sound very intimidating... :rolleyes:

Please continue to think in those terms... arrogance and hubris on your part will work in favor of the rest of us, once the window of opportunity opens once again, for some fancy legal juggling and footwork.

Yes, your arrogance and hubris is setting you and the failures like you up for a big fall.

Most heterosexuals support marriage equality

You freak false Christians of the far right no longer get to dictate what other people do in their lives. Tough that. :lol:
Thank you for your feedback.

January 20, 2017 approach-eth... tick... tick... tick...
 
This question can apply to all places of worship, so mosques, synagogues, hindu temples etc.

Should places or worship be forced to accommodate for gay weddings?

No. Churches can choose to marry whomever, and refuse whomever.
 
Churches should burn in Hell because religion is the single greatest lie in all of human history.

Let me get this straight...

You're claiming that Hell is an actual place in which people, and apparently buildings meant for religious worship, can burn for the sin of lying...while also saying that a believe in such matters constitutes a "lie".

Are you fucking retarded?
 
If a church gets taxpayers money then they have to hold gay weddings. But if not then they have the right to choose.
 
Nope. The 14th amendment only mandates equal protection of the laws. It prevents the government from discriminating, not private citizens.

Unless they are involved in Interstate Commerce, or run public businesses. Of course churches are not businesses, and cannot be forced to violate their faith, a moot point.

The 14th does prevent citizens in public business from discriminating.

Tough that, bripat.


No Jake it doesn't. The 14th Amendment limits the functions of government when it comes to discrimination against it's citizens.

Public Business conduct is governed under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution based on the interstate nature of pretty much every business relying out out of state traffic, goods, and services.

At the State level State governance of Public Businesses is based on the 10th Amendment and the State power to regulate commerce internal to the State.

Regulation of private business does not fall under the 14th Amendment.



>>>>
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top