Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good to see all the corporatists lining up together.
Good to see all the corporatists lining up together.
Is this where we get the standard libertariaism 'we shouldn't have any anti-discrimination laws' schtick again?
Its not the schtick that bugs me. Its all the time of mine you waste pretending its something other than your schtick....before coming to the same tired talking points.
Speed it up a little.
Good to see all the corporatists lining up together.
Is this where we get the standard libertariaism 'we shouldn't have any anti-discrimination laws' schtick again?
Its not the schtick that bugs me. Its all the time of mine you waste pretending its something other than your schtick....before coming to the same tired talking points.
Speed it up a little.
I don't waste any of your time. You do.
Good to see all the corporatists lining up together.
Is this where we get the standard libertariaism 'we shouldn't have any anti-discrimination laws' schtick again?
Its not the schtick that bugs me. Its all the time of mine you waste pretending its something other than your schtick....before coming to the same tired talking points.
Speed it up a little.
I don't waste any of your time. You do.
Well I am talking to you. And I already know your entire script. So.....you may have a point.
Churches are religious institutions that exist to spread the word of whatever God they worship.Good to see all the corporatists lining up together.
Churches are religious institutions that exist to spread the word of whatever God they worship.Good to see all the corporatists lining up together.
Businesses exist to make money and get rich, not promote some spiritual and moral agenda.
The two clearly aren't the same.
Yes, they aren't. A person's faith is protected Constitutionally. The right to do trade with this or that person isn't. And neither is the "right" to force a Christian to abdicate their faith to passively refuse to accomodate anyone's behavior that is forbidden under penalty of eternal soul death in the Bible. (see Jude 1 for details)Churches are religious institutions that exist to spread the word of whatever God they worship.
Businesses exist to make money and get rich, not promote some spiritual and moral agenda.
The two clearly aren't the same.
Yes, they aren't. A person's faith is protected Constitutionally.Churches are religious institutions that exist to spread the word of whatever God they worship.
Businesses exist to make money and get rich, not promote some spiritual and moral agenda.
The two clearly aren't the same.
The right to do trade with this or that person isn't. And neither is the "right" to force a Christian to abdicate their faith to passively refuse to accomodate anyone's behavior that is forbidden under penalty of eternal soul death in the Bible. (see Jude 1 for details)
Yes, they aren't. A person's faith is protected Constitutionally.Churches are religious institutions that exist to spread the word of whatever God they worship.
Businesses exist to make money and get rich, not promote some spiritual and moral agenda.
The two clearly aren't the same.
Not to the extent that they can ignore any law they wish. Take Kim Davis. No court has found that there have been any violations of her rights in requiring her to do her job.
So....you've got no constitutional violation. You do however have a violated court order.
The right to do trade with this or that person isn't. And neither is the "right" to force a Christian to abdicate their faith to passively refuse to accomodate anyone's behavior that is forbidden under penalty of eternal soul death in the Bible. (see Jude 1 for details)
Jude 1 never makes the slightest mention of gay marriage or weddings cakes.
But you do demonstrate how uselessly subjective religion is. And how you can quite literally make up anything you'd like, on any basis, pulled sideways out of your ass. And hallucinate entire passages that don't exist, as you've done with Jude 1.
And per your view on the constitution, should be able to use that made up justification to ignore any law.
What you're demanding is a religiously based sovereign citizen argument. Where all laws are voluntary and subordinate to religion. That's not our system nor ever has been.
Churches are religious institutions that exist to spread the word of whatever God they worship.
Businesses exist to make money and get rich, not promote some spiritual and moral agenda.
The two clearly aren't the same.
Yes, they aren't. A person's faith is protected Constitutionally. A person's faith is protected Constitutionally. The right to do trade with this or that person isn't. And neither is the "right" to force a Christian to abdicate their faith to passively refuse to accomodate anyone's behavior that is forbidden under penalty of eternal soul death in the Bible. (see Jude 1 for details)
Not to the extent that they can ignore any law they wish..
Yes, they aren't. A person's faith is protected Constitutionally.Churches are religious institutions that exist to spread the word of whatever God they worship.
Businesses exist to make money and get rich, not promote some spiritual and moral agenda.
The two clearly aren't the same.
Not to the extent that they can ignore any law they wish. Take Kim Davis. No court has found that there have been any violations of her rights in requiring her to do her job.
So....you've got no constitutional violation. You do however have a violated court order.
The right to do trade with this or that person isn't. And neither is the "right" to force a Christian to abdicate their faith to passively refuse to accomodate anyone's behavior that is forbidden under penalty of eternal soul death in the Bible. (see Jude 1 for details)
Jude 1 never makes the slightest mention of gay marriage or weddings cakes.
But you do demonstrate how uselessly subjective religion is. And how you can quite literally make up anything you'd like, on any basis, pulled sideways out of your ass. And hallucinate entire passages that don't exist, as you've done with Jude 1.
And per your view on the constitution, should be able to use that made up justification to ignore any law.
What you're demanding is a religiously based sovereign citizen argument. Where all laws are voluntary and subordinate to religion. That's not our system nor ever has been.
Hehe.... backpedalling for the win!
Churches don't have to accommodate gay marriage. But people aren't churches. I would think this was obvious. But clearly I have to reiterate this fact for you.
Churches are religious institutions that exist to spread the word of whatever God they worship.
Businesses exist to make money and get rich, not promote some spiritual and moral agenda.
The two clearly aren't the same.Yes, they aren't. A person's faith is protected Constitutionally.
Not to the extent that they can ignore any law they wish..
Passively refusing to promote homosexuality is Kim Davis' right as a Christian who knows the dire warnings of Jude 1 and what the Pope just re-asserted late September...
You may have forgotten so I'll remind you once again of the false premise. Homosexuals aren't a race of people. They are just people doing aberrent things strictly forbidden in the Bible.
Churches don't have to accommodate gay marriage. But people aren't churches. I would think this was obvious. But clearly I have to reiterate this fact for you.
The 1st Amendment doesn't say "freedom of church"...it says "freedom of religion"
Oh, you mean that the God of "love and mercy" would damn anyone to hell for acknowledging two people's right to love each other? If God hates gays so much, why did He create people with the ability to love homosexually?Churches are religious institutions that exist to spread the word of whatever God they worship.
Businesses exist to make money and get rich, not promote some spiritual and moral agenda.
The two clearly aren't the same.Yes, they aren't. A person's faith is protected Constitutionally. A person's faith is protected Constitutionally. The right to do trade with this or that person isn't. And neither is the "right" to force a Christian to abdicate their faith to passively refuse to accomodate anyone's behavior that is forbidden under penalty of eternal soul death in the Bible. (see Jude 1 for details)
Not to the extent that they can ignore any law they wish..
Passively refusing to promote homosexuality is Kim Davis' right as a Christian who knows the dire warnings of Jude 1 and what the Pope just re-asserted late September... You may have forgotten so I'll remind you once again of the false premise. Homosexuals aren't a race of people. They are just people doing aberrent things strictly forbidden in the Bible.
Read St. Mark's words of Jesus and St. Paul's counsel. We are to obey authority, and the sin if any rests on the authorities not the Christian. Sil is only a nominal Christian if that, so understand she does not grasp Christian teaching.
Oh, you mean that the God of "love and mercy" would damn anyone to hell for acknowledging two people's right to love each other? If God hates gays so much, why did He create people with the ability to love homosexually?
Oh, so what you're saying is that you don't have to hate someone to banish them to eternal suffering? Humans, as flawed as we are, don't even wish that on people who cross us on minor things, and usually not when someone majorly offends us. Yet God, a being of infinite love, would damn someone without a second thought because of love?Oh, you mean that the God of "love and mercy" would damn anyone to hell for acknowledging two people's right to love each other? If God hates gays so much, why did He create people with the ability to love homosexually?
God doesn't hate homosexuals since there is no such thing anyway. God hates the sin, not the sinner. Read Jude 1 when you get a minute.