Should this 16 year old be permanently banned from possessing firearms?

[jotathought]

16-year-old arrested after police received tip he was recruiting students for a mass shooting at a California high school, officials say | CNN

A 16-year-old boy was arrested this week after police learned he was allegedly recruiting students to carry out a mass shooting at a high school in Berkeley, California, authorities said Wednesday.

www.cnn.com

I vote YES!!!

He'll most likely be charged with felonious activities, which will make it a challenge for him to purchase weapons in the future through licensed dealers; Regardless, the key should be his behaviors and insights into his mental and behavioral activities -- which are often related to these types of mass shooting activities.

 

[Lesh]

Convict him of a felony first. Due process matters.

So wait till he murders a bunch of school kids

 

[Rogue AI]

So wait till he murders a bunch of school kids

Do you not understand due process?

 

[B. Kidd]

Fuck!
I feel safer already.
Don't you??

 

[M14 Shooter]

So wait till he murders a bunch of school kids

Look at you,. not paying -any- attention to the issue at hand.

 

[badbob85037]

No 16 year old should be in possession of a firearm.

What does a gun grabber know? Nothing, You have never fired a gun, served in the military and must of been one under developed teenager. I would explain why but I would be wasting my time.

 

[westwall]

No 16 year old should be in possession of a firearm.

You have clearly never been on a Res. When I lived on Pine Ridge we were toting guns as early as 8 years old.

 

[whitehall]

At least he will be banned for the next ten years or so while he serves time in a secure facility but wait, Ca. authorities will most likely release him so it doesn't matter what we think.