simple question for the WTC collapse

[eots]

why does an avalanche gain speed as it comes down a mountain?

why do avalanches stop half way down a steep incline

deflection instead of an answer says volumes.

deflection is bring up avalanches in an attempt to compare apples to oranges

 

[Derideo_Te]

why do avalanches stop half way down a steep incline

deflection instead of an answer says volumes.

deflection is bring up avalanches in an attempt to compare apples to oranges

Obviously I am wasting my time trying to explain gravitational acceleration to someone who refuses to maintain an open mind on this topic. Have a nice day.

 

[Derideo_Te]

why did the gravity induced collapse video not descend and the rate of milliseconds per floor ?

it descended at an accelerating rate irrespective of the time measurement used until it could go no further. The time taken to collapse each floor was constantly reduced as the mass of the debris increased and accelerated under the force of gravity.

so you are claiming the towers accelerated with each floor of the collapse

I recommend that you take the time to read up on gravitational acceleration for yourself.

 

[eots]

it descended at an accelerating rate irrespective of the time measurement used until it could go no further. The time taken to collapse each floor was constantly reduced as the mass of the debris increased and accelerated under the force of gravity.

so you are claiming the towers accelerated with each floor of the collapse

i recommend that you take the time to read up on gravitational acceleration for yourself.

so in other words you are not going to answer the question?

 

[eots]

NIST has joined the people that could not see how a total disintegration of
the Twin Towers could be anything but a controlled demolition.
"NIST Admits Total Collapse Of Twin Towers Unexplainable"

The National Institute for Standards and Technology has been forced to admit
that the total free-fall collapse of the twin towers cannot be explained
after an exhaustive scientific study, implicitly acknowledging that
controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have
come down.

In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim's family representatives Bill
Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, "We are unable to provide a full
explanation of the total collapse."

A 10,000 page scientific study only offers theories as to how the "collapse
initiation" proceeded and fails to address how it was possible for part of a
WTC structure to fall through the path of most resistance at freefall speed,
completely violating the accepted laws of physics.

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/161007_nist_admits.htm

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

NIST has joined the people that could not see how a total disintegration of
the Twin Towers could be anything but a controlled demolition.
"NIST Admits Total Collapse Of Twin Towers Unexplainable"

The National Institute for Standards and Technology has been forced to admit
that the total free-fall collapse of the twin towers cannot be explained
after an exhaustive scientific study, implicitly acknowledging that
controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have
come down.

In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim's family representatives Bill
Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, "We are unable to provide a full
explanation of the total collapse."

A 10,000 page scientific study only offers theories as to how the "collapse
initiation" proceeded and fails to address how it was possible for part of a
WTC structure to fall through the path of most resistance at freefall speed,
completely violating the accepted laws of physics.

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/161007_nist_admits.htm

In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim's family representatives Bill
Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, "We are unable to provide a full
explanation of the total collapse."

Did their partial explanation include thermite or explosives?

 

[eots]

NIST has joined the people that could not see how a total disintegration of
the Twin Towers could be anything but a controlled demolition.
"NIST Admits Total Collapse Of Twin Towers Unexplainable"

The National Institute for Standards and Technology has been forced to admit
that the total free-fall collapse of the twin towers cannot be explained
after an exhaustive scientific study, implicitly acknowledging that
controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have
come down.

In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim's family representatives Bill
Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, "We are unable to provide a full
explanation of the total collapse."

A 10,000 page scientific study only offers theories as to how the "collapse
initiation" proceeded and fails to address how it was possible for part of a
WTC structure to fall through the path of most resistance at freefall speed,
completely violating the accepted laws of physics.

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/161007_nist_admits.htm

In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim's family representatives Bill
Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, "We are unable to provide a full
explanation of the total collapse."

Did their partial explanation include thermite or explosives?

No...thats why they can only give a "partial explanation"

 

[Derideo_Te]

so you are claiming the towers accelerated with each floor of the collapse

i recommend that you take the time to read up on gravitational acceleration for yourself.

so in other words you are not going to answer the question?

I have already answered the question.

 

[eots]

i recommend that you take the time to read up on gravitational acceleration for yourself.

so in other words you are not going to answer the question?

I have already answered the question.

it was a yes or no question ..you provided no such response

 

[Derideo_Te]

NIST has joined the people that could not see how a total disintegration of
the Twin Towers could be anything but a controlled demolition.
"NIST Admits Total Collapse Of Twin Towers Unexplainable"

The National Institute for Standards and Technology has been forced to admit
that the total free-fall collapse of the twin towers cannot be explained
after an exhaustive scientific study, implicitly acknowledging that
controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have
come down.

In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim's family representatives Bill
Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, "We are unable to provide a full
explanation of the total collapse."

A 10,000 page scientific study only offers theories as to how the "collapse
initiation" proceeded and fails to address how it was possible for part of a
WTC structure to fall through the path of most resistance at freefall speed,
completely violating the accepted laws of physics.

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/161007_nist_admits.htm

In a recent letter (PDF link) to 9/11 victim's family representatives Bill
Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, NIST states, "We are unable to provide a full
explanation of the total collapse."

Did their partial explanation include thermite or explosives?

No...thats why they can only give a "partial explanation"

As professionals they will only provide explanations that they can prove. They have no obligation to address every random conspiracy theory.

 

[eots]

in a recent letter (pdf link) to 9/11 victim's family representatives bill
doyle and bob mcilvaine, nist states, "we are unable to provide a full
explanation of the total collapse."

did their partial explanation include thermite or explosives?

no...thats why they can only give a "partial explanation"

as professionals they will only provide explanations that they can prove. They have no obligation to address every random conspiracy theory.

giving a full explanation of a collapse is addressing conspiracy theories ?

 

[eots]

They have an obligation to prove their theory fully

 

[Derideo_Te]

so in other words you are not going to answer the question?

I have already answered the question.

it was a yes or no question ..you provided no such response

Your comprehension of the answer is on a par with your comprehension of the NIST report and the engineering principles involved.

 

[Derideo_Te]

They have an obligation to prove their theory fully

Your comprehension of the investigation process could also use work.

 

[eots]

i have already answered the question.

it was a yes or no question ..you provided no such response

your comprehension of the answer is on a par with your comprehension of the nist report and the engineering principles involved.

This statement is backed with nothing ..its just an empty statement ,you do not seem to understand..even nist admits it failed to explain the full collapse

 

[eots]

They have an obligation to prove their theory fully

Your comprehension of the investigation process could also use work.

ANOTHER EMPTY STATEMENT BACKED BY NOTHING...NIST INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS WAS COMPLETELY LACKING..

Dr. Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation. “They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job. But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire. And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information. What prevented all of this? I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST. And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything.”

OpEdNews - Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-GFBEX5bjY]Lynn Margulis (PhD - Scientist) - 9/11 Explosive Evidence - Experts speak out (AE911TRUTH) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

alright, which one of you twofers resurrected this done to death thread?
couldn't come up with some new bullshit for the anniversary ?

 

[daws101]

They have an obligation to prove their theory fully

Your comprehension of the investigation process could also use work.

ANOTHER EMPTY STATEMENT BACKED BY NOTHING...NIST INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS WAS COMPLETELY LACKING..

Dr. Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation. “They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job. But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire. And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information. What prevented all of this? I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST. And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything.”

OpEdNews - Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-GFBEX5bjY]Lynn Margulis (PhD - Scientist) - 9/11 Explosive Evidence - Experts speak out (AE911TRUTH) - YouTube[/ame]

she was and is still unqualified to give evidence.

 

[whitehall]

Anybody ever watch a reality show where controlled demolitions bring down a building? There are literally weeks of preparation just to expose the areas so that the demolition engineers can see where to place the charges. Next there is another week or two while many, many holes are drilled in the concrete for the explosive charges. The incredible mass of wiring is carefully mapped out and attached to a computer for synchronized blasts. I guess the MTV generation who were raised in front of a TV set think that the CIA and/or the FBI or some rogue US government agency could pull it off right in front of some of the best security networks in the world and keep it a secret but it's a freaking pipe dream. Why didn't it happen when the jihad tried it with a truck of explosives in the first year of the Clinton administration? It certainly would have been easier to synchronize timed explosives with a freaking truck parked in the basement than coordinate with two crazy squads of suicide bombers in planes. Nothing makes sense except wishful thinking.

 

[eots]

your comprehension of the investigation process could also use work.

another empty statement backed by nothing...nist investigative process was completely lacking..

Dr. Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that nist would do a good job with the investigation. “they’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job. But what i also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the atf [bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire. And i thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information. What prevented all of this? I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the commerce department and therefore nist. And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything.”

opednews - article: Former chief of nist's fire science division calls for independent review of world trade center investigation


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-gfbex5bjy]lynn margulis (phd - scientist) - 9/11 explosive evidence - experts speak out (ae911truth) - youtube[/ame]

she was and is still unqualified to give evidence.

She is an expert in scientific method and fully qualified to comment on NIST lack of it