Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
anybody ever watch a reality show where controlled demolitions bring down a building? There are literally weeks of preparation just to expose the areas so that the demolition engineers can see where to place the charges. Next there is another week or two while many, many holes are drilled in the concrete for the explosive charges. The incredible mass of wiring is carefully mapped out and attached to a computer for synchronized blasts. I guess the mtv generation who were raised in front of a tv set think that the cia and/or the fbi or some rogue us government agency could pull it off right in front of some of the best security networks in the world and keep it a secret but it's a freaking pipe dream. Why didn't it happen when the jihad tried it with a truck of explosives in the first year of the clinton administration? It certainly would have been easier to synchronize timed explosives with a freaking truck parked in the basement than coordinate with two crazy squads of suicide bombers in planes. Nothing makes sense except wishful thinking.
you wish....she has no experience in the necessary fields ...her opinion is is no better than non experienced nonscientists.she was and is still unqualified to give evidence.another empty statement backed by nothing...nist investigative process was completely lacking..
Dr. Quintiere said he originally had high hopes that nist would do a good job with the investigation. theyre the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job. But what i also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the atf [bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire. And i thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information. What prevented all of this? I think its the legal structure that cloaks the commerce department and therefore nist. And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything.
opednews - article: Former chief of nist's fire science division calls for independent review of world trade center investigation
lynn margulis (phd - scientist) - 9/11 explosive evidence - experts speak out (ae911truth) - youtube
She is an expert in scientific method and fully qualified to comment on NIST lack of it
anybody ever watch a reality show where controlled demolitions bring down a building? There are literally weeks of preparation just to expose the areas so that the demolition engineers can see where to place the charges. Next there is another week or two while many, many holes are drilled in the concrete for the explosive charges. The incredible mass of wiring is carefully mapped out and attached to a computer for synchronized blasts. I guess the mtv generation who were raised in front of a tv set think that the cia and/or the fbi or some rogue us government agency could pull it off right in front of some of the best security networks in the world and keep it a secret but it's a freaking pipe dream. Why didn't it happen when the jihad tried it with a truck of explosives in the first year of the clinton administration? It certainly would have been easier to synchronize timed explosives with a freaking truck parked in the basement than coordinate with two crazy squads of suicide bombers in planes. Nothing makes sense except wishful thinking.
there are people vastly more knowledgeable than you including engineers who worked at the wtc that do not see anywhere near the same degree of difficulty you do and they are without question not a part of the mtv generation
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJy7lhVK2xE]Richard Humenn P.E. - WTC Chief Electrical Design Engineer - AE911Truth.org - YouTube[/ame]
that's all his wife gets on their anniversary and christmas...anybody ever watch a reality show where controlled demolitions bring down a building? There are literally weeks of preparation just to expose the areas so that the demolition engineers can see where to place the charges. Next there is another week or two while many, many holes are drilled in the concrete for the explosive charges. The incredible mass of wiring is carefully mapped out and attached to a computer for synchronized blasts. I guess the mtv generation who were raised in front of a tv set think that the cia and/or the fbi or some rogue us government agency could pull it off right in front of some of the best security networks in the world and keep it a secret but it's a freaking pipe dream. Why didn't it happen when the jihad tried it with a truck of explosives in the first year of the clinton administration? It certainly would have been easier to synchronize timed explosives with a freaking truck parked in the basement than coordinate with two crazy squads of suicide bombers in planes. Nothing makes sense except wishful thinking.
there are people vastly more knowledgeable than you including engineers who worked at the wtc that do not see anywhere near the same degree of difficulty you do and they are without question not a part of the mtv generation
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJy7lhVK2xE]Richard Humenn P.E. - WTC Chief Electrical Design Engineer - AE911Truth.org - YouTube[/ame]
The burden is on the conspiracy theorists. I stated my opinion about the engineering difficulties of bringing down a building with controlled explosive and all I get is a you tube video.
Anybody ever watch a reality show where controlled demolitions bring down a building? There are literally weeks of preparation just to expose the areas so that the demolition engineers can see where to place the charges. Next there is another week or two while many, many holes are drilled in the concrete for the explosive charges. The incredible mass of wiring is carefully mapped out and attached to a computer for synchronized blasts. I guess the MTV generation who were raised in front of a TV set think that the CIA and/or the FBI or some rogue US government agency could pull it off right in front of some of the best security networks in the world and keep it a secret but it's a freaking pipe dream. Why didn't it happen when the jihad tried it with a truck of explosives in the first year of the Clinton administration? It certainly would have been easier to synchronize timed explosives with a freaking truck parked in the basement than coordinate with two crazy squads of suicide bombers in planes. Nothing makes sense except wishful thinking.
Anybody ever watch a reality show where controlled demolitions bring down a building? There are literally weeks of preparation just to expose the areas so that the demolition engineers can see where to place the charges. Next there is another week or two while many, many holes are drilled in the concrete for the explosive charges. The incredible mass of wiring is carefully mapped out and attached to a computer for synchronized blasts. I guess the MTV generation who were raised in front of a TV set think that the CIA and/or the FBI or some rogue US government agency could pull it off right in front of some of the best security networks in the world and keep it a secret but it's a freaking pipe dream. Why didn't it happen when the jihad tried it with a truck of explosives in the first year of the Clinton administration? It certainly would have been easier to synchronize timed explosives with a freaking truck parked in the basement than coordinate with two crazy squads of suicide bombers in planes. Nothing makes sense except wishful thinking.
Exactly!
None of the wires, detonators, explosives, thermite etc etc etc was disrupted by a jumbo jet full of fuel crashing into the buildings. None of the explosive rigs was left undetonated and later discovered in the debris.
No one involved in the task came forward to spill the beans.
Unless they were the 19 highjackers?
Now it all makes sense.
Anybody ever watch a reality show where controlled demolitions bring down a building? There are literally weeks of preparation just to expose the areas so that the demolition engineers can see where to place the charges. Next there is another week or two while many, many holes are drilled in the concrete for the explosive charges. The incredible mass of wiring is carefully mapped out and attached to a computer for synchronized blasts. I guess the MTV generation who were raised in front of a TV set think that the CIA and/or the FBI or some rogue US government agency could pull it off right in front of some of the best security networks in the world and keep it a secret but it's a freaking pipe dream. Why didn't it happen when the jihad tried it with a truck of explosives in the first year of the Clinton administration? It certainly would have been easier to synchronize timed explosives with a freaking truck parked in the basement than coordinate with two crazy squads of suicide bombers in planes. Nothing makes sense except wishful thinking.
Exactly!
None of the wires, detonators, explosives, thermite etc etc etc was disrupted by a jumbo jet full of fuel crashing into the buildings. None of the explosive rigs was left undetonated and later discovered in the debris.
No one involved in the task came forward to spill the beans.
Unless they were the 19 highjackers?
Now it all makes sense.
It's interesting how the conspiracy theorists twist logic. The "expert" Richard Huminan is a qualified electrical engineer with many years experience. In the interview he tries to qualify himself as an explosive expert by citing "instruction" at Ft. Belvoir regarding explosives but he doesn't elaborate about the expertise he is relaying. Presumably the class on explosives was during a two year hitch in the Army many years ago. As an electrical engineer Mr Huminan had a unique responsibility for electrical maintenance in the WTT but he doesn't admit to being part of any plot nor does he state any instance where any one of the 60 employees he supervised thought something was wrong. He isn't qualified to an opinion about the preparation and effects of controlled demolition any more than anyone else who saw the video. It's wishful thinking swallowed only by people who can't think rationally.
you wish....she has no experience in the necessary fields ...her opinion is is no better than non experienced nonscientists.she was and is still unqualified to give evidence.
She is an expert in scientific method and fully qualified to comment on NIST lack of it
you wish....she has no experience in the necessary fields ...her opinion is is no better than non experienced nonscientists.She is an expert in scientific method and fully qualified to comment on NIST lack of it
Not I wish ..she has been singled out and honored by her esteemed peers in science as being among the very best
you wish....she has no experience in the necessary fields ...her opinion is is no better than non experienced nonscientists.
Not I wish ..she has been singled out and honored by her esteemed peers in science as being among the very best
But the point, I think, is that being the best in one field does not make you the best in others. The best neurosurgeon in the world isn't someone you go to for information on plastic surgery. The top astrophysicist is not the best choice for explaining paleontology.
So if the woman in discussion doesn't have any education or experience in relevant fields, her opinion shouldn't necessarily hold more weight than any other layman's.
Also, who are the peers who honored her and what was it for being the best at? That was left vague.
Not I wish ..she has been singled out and honored by her esteemed peers in science as being among the very best
But the point, I think, is that being the best in one field does not make you the best in others. The best neurosurgeon in the world isn't someone you go to for information on plastic surgery. The top astrophysicist is not the best choice for explaining paleontology.
So if the woman in discussion doesn't have any education or experience in relevant fields, her opinion shouldn't necessarily hold more weight than any other layman's.
Also, who are the peers who honored her and what was it for being the best at? That was left vague.
She was honored by peers in a wide feild of sceintific expertise specifically for her ability to reason and proper use of scientific method and that is exactly what she was critiquing in regards to NIST
But the point, I think, is that being the best in one field does not make you the best in others. The best neurosurgeon in the world isn't someone you go to for information on plastic surgery. The top astrophysicist is not the best choice for explaining paleontology.
So if the woman in discussion doesn't have any education or experience in relevant fields, her opinion shouldn't necessarily hold more weight than any other layman's.
Also, who are the peers who honored her and what was it for being the best at? That was left vague.
She was honored by peers in a wide feild of sceintific expertise specifically for her ability to reason and proper use of scientific method and that is exactly what she was critiquing in regards to NIST
That still seems pretty vague. Ability to reason? What does that really mean?
Proper use of the scientific method? What, she's good at data gathering, communicating her findings, what? Or was it more that she didn't cheat on any of her research?
Your description sounds like a lifetime achievement type of thing, not something to show expertise in an unrelated field.
Not to disparage the woman's intelligence, education or experience; she may be qualified to speak on the subject of 9/11 with authority. I'm just saying your description doesn't really show that.
There are very simple answers to those questions. But before I answer your questions, you should answer the question in the top post. Can you see an intact 40 story structure bearing down on the lower floors in that picture? I don't see any intact structure, there's nothing but debris. What happened to 40 stories of vertical truss? What blew that to bits? In 5 seconds time?
ANOTHER EMPTY STATEMENT BACKED BY NOTHING.
ANOTHER EMPTY STATEMENT BACKED BY NOTHING.
How ironic coming from someone who has utterly failed to substantiate every single one of his conspiracy allegations.
