Sister of Dallas Assassin: Cops Had It Coming

[Hutch Starskey]

Sister of Dallas Assassin: Cops Had It Coming


Somehow that's different than the black crime threads that allude to the same point by highlighting just how awful blacks are.

 

[depotoo]

Poor Pogo. Can't stand it that her understanding vs someone else's, which is proven can be either or, could be questioned. Since I pulled that from Merriam Webster remember not to use them as a source, for her world is not able to accept one of the oldest American dictionary references around.

In 1806, Webster published his first dictionary, A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language. In 1807 Webster started two decades of intensive work to expand his publication into a fully comprehensive dictionary, An American Dictionary of the English Language.

assassinated assassinating

transitive verb

1: to injure or destroy unexpectedly and treacherously

2: to murder (a usually prominent person) by sudden or secret attack often for political reasons


So, both are right.

Once again --- the "Dallas Assassin" (assassins) would be whoever shot JFK. THAT is an "assassination".
It's got nothing to do with "cops".

Your semantic BS is laughable. And yes, those were assassins that murdered those cops. They need slow electrocution in the electric chair.

Actually you just proved my point, even if you're too dense to see it.

You "assassinate" a Kennedy or a King or a Lincoln. Somebody who not only has deep and widespread influence, i.e. somebody whose name doesn't have to be explained with the question "who's that?". You don't "assassinate" somebody whose name you don't even know without looking it up in the article. That's not "deep OR widespread influence". "Cop" is generic.

All this is is naked hyperbole designed to inflame by injecting emotion --- inflating the event to pretend it's much bigger than it is, by pretending the victim was much bigger than he was. That's dishonest. And you just engaged in the same emotional device with the whole "slow electrocution in the redundant electric chair" song and dance.

As I said --- you just illustrated the point by exhibiting a second example of the same thing. Thanks for that.


The OP has been consistently trying to push this "assassination" bullshit to anyone who will listen, and I've been consistently calling it out for the dishonesty it is. Because his point is not, in this case, what the sister said. His point is to germinate the seed of the concept of "assassination". He's obsessed with it.

You'll notice that for all his flinging of the word "assassination" ---- he never mentions the name of a victim. That's because the names are so deeply influential ---- he'd have to look them up ---- and probably spell them wrong, like he did yesterday with his own buzzword.

It's also because he doesn't care what their names are, since all they are is faceless props to stand on so he can make partisan-hack points on an internet message board. On their backs.

-------- which is why I call it out for the disingenuous bullshit it is.

Hope that clears it up. But it will prolly sail right over your head.

Not in English usage ----

as·sas·si·nate
(ə-săs′ə-nāt′)
tr.v. as·sas·si·nat·ed, as·sas·si·nat·ing, as·sas·si·nates
1. To murder (a prominent person) by surprise attack, as for political reasons.
2. To destroy or injure treacherously: assassinate a rival's character. (Link: Freedic)​

See the phrase "a prominent person"? That describes JFK. It describes Lincoln. It describes Martin Luther King.
It does *not* describe a policeman with no name. Having to look up the victim's name ensures the person is not "prominent".

Shall we zip off to the definition of "prominent" now in the vain quest to win an unwinnable argument trying to rationalize weasel words we all perfectly well know are bullshitious?

Later in the same link, under "Thesaurus:

Noun

1. assassination - an attack intended to ruin someone's reputation
blackwash, character assassination
calumniation, calumny, defamation, hatchet job, traducement, obloquy - a false accusation of an offense or a malicious misrepresentation of someone's words or actions

2. assassination - murder of a public figure by surprise attack
​

Again --- "public" does not mean "it happened in a public place".

Cut the bullshit. Bullshit is what the OP is selling with his relentless obsession on the inflationary term "assassination". Grow a pair and refuse to buy it.

 

[Unkotare]

What kind of low-life son of a bitch would denigrate the police officers who were so recently assassinated by claiming they had "no name"? What a scumbag fucking piece of shit. He is so concerned with his little ego at being wrong on a matter of English usage that he would insult these brave public figures who devoted their lives to protecting the rights of ungrateful little filth like him. What a worthless fucking FAILURE of a human being.

 

[Pogo]

Poor Pogo. Can't stand it that her understanding vs someone else's, which is proven can be either or, could be questioned. Since I pulled that from Merriam Webster remember not to use them as a source, for her world is not able to accept one of the oldest American dictionary references around.

In 1806, Webster published his first dictionary, A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language. In 1807 Webster started two decades of intensive work to expand his publication into a fully comprehensive dictionary, An American Dictionary of the English Language.

assassinated assassinating

transitive verb

1: to injure or destroy unexpectedly and treacherously

2: to murder (a usually prominent person) by sudden or secret attack often for political reasons


So, both are right.

Once again --- the "Dallas Assassin" (assassins) would be whoever shot JFK. THAT is an "assassination".
It's got nothing to do with "cops".

Your semantic BS is laughable. And yes, those were assassins that murdered those cops. They need slow electrocution in the electric chair.

Actually you just proved my point, even if you're too dense to see it.

You "assassinate" a Kennedy or a King or a Lincoln. Somebody who not only has deep and widespread influence, i.e. somebody whose name doesn't have to be explained with the question "who's that?". You don't "assassinate" somebody whose name you don't even know without looking it up in the article. That's not "deep OR widespread influence". "Cop" is generic.

All this is is naked hyperbole designed to inflame by injecting emotion --- inflating the event to pretend it's much bigger than it is, by pretending the victim was much bigger than he was. That's dishonest. And you just engaged in the same emotional device with the whole "slow electrocution in the redundant electric chair" song and dance.

As I said --- you just illustrated the point by exhibiting a second example of the same thing. Thanks for that.


The OP has been consistently trying to push this "assassination" bullshit to anyone who will listen, and I've been consistently calling it out for the dishonesty it is. Because his point is not, in this case, what the sister said. His point is to germinate the seed of the concept of "assassination". He's obsessed with it.

You'll notice that for all his flinging of the word "assassination" ---- he never mentions the name of a victim. That's because the names are so deeply influential ---- he'd have to look them up ---- and probably spell them wrong, like he did yesterday with his own buzzword.

It's also because he doesn't care what their names are, since all they are is faceless props to stand on so he can make partisan-hack points on an internet message board. On their backs.

-------- which is why I call it out for the disingenuous bullshit it is.

Hope that clears it up. But it will prolly sail right over your head.

Not in English usage ----

as·sas·si·nate
(ə-săs′ə-nāt′)
tr.v. as·sas·si·nat·ed, as·sas·si·nat·ing, as·sas·si·nates
1. To murder (a prominent person) by surprise attack, as for political reasons.
2. To destroy or injure treacherously: assassinate a rival's character. (Link: Freedic)​

See the phrase "a prominent person"? That describes JFK. It describes Lincoln. It describes Martin Luther King.
It does *not* describe a policeman with no name. Having to look up the victim's name ensures the person is not "prominent".

Shall we zip off to the definition of "prominent" now in the vain quest to win an unwinnable argument trying to rationalize weasel words we all perfectly well know are bullshitious?

Later in the same link, under "Thesaurus:

Noun

1. assassination - an attack intended to ruin someone's reputation
blackwash, character assassination
calumniation, calumny, defamation, hatchet job, traducement, obloquy - a false accusation of an offense or a malicious misrepresentation of someone's words or actions

2. assassination - murder of a public figure by surprise attack
​

Again --- "public" does not mean "it happened in a public place".

Cut the bullshit. Bullshit is what the OP is selling with his relentless obsession on the inflationary term "assassination". Grow a pair and refuse to buy it.

Who in the fuck is "her"? You actually think "Merriam Webster" is a woman's name?

Btw learn how to post. It's like a toilet paper roll---- UNDER, not over.

 

[HenryBHough]

Is that sort of murderous mindset caused by joining The Democrat Party - or is it prerequisite for joining? You can tell an Obama voter - but you can't tell her/him/it much.

 

[Contumacious]

What kind of low-life son of a bitch would denigrate the police officers who were so recently assassinated by claiming they had "no name"? What a scumbag fucking piece of shit. He is so concerned with his little ego at being wrong on a matter of English usage that he would insult these brave public figures who devoted their lives to protecting the rights of ungrateful little filth like him. What a worthless fucking FAILURE of a human being.

that he would insult these brave public figures who devoted their lives to protecting the rights of ungrateful little filth like him.

Police Are More Dangerous To The Public Than Are Criminals

At the state and local level every American faces brutal, armed psychopaths known as the police. The “law and order” conservatives and the “compassionate” liberals stand silent while police psychopaths brutalize children and grandmothers, murder double amputees in wheel chairs, break into the wrong homes, murder the family dogs, and terrify the occupants, pointing their automatic assault weapons in the faces of small children.

The American police perform no positive function. They pose a much larger threat to citizens than do the criminals who operate without a police badge. Americans would be safer if the police forces were abolished.

The police have been militarized and largely federalized by the Pentagon and the gestapo Homeland Security. The role of the federal government in equipping state and local police with military weapons, including tanks, and training in their use has essentially removed the police from state and local control. No matter how brutal any police officer, it is rare that any suffer more than a few months suspension, usually with full pay, while a report is concocted that clears them of any wrong doing