Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So as soon as you find some Hebrews who have slaves today, you can point your nasty finger at them all you like.BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA !!!!!!!The Muslim equivalent of the Biblical defense used by the white and black slaveowner assholes arguing for slavery before the Civil War.
THERE IT IS FOLKS !!!
There it is indeed. I gave him a "Winner".
And here it is in slightly more detail:
>> The Bible identifies different categories of slaves including female Hebrew slaves, male Hebrew slaves, non-Hebrew and hereditary slaves. These were subject to different regulations.These are explored in still more detail at the link: Rational Wiki
Female Hebrews could be sold by their fathers and enslaved for life (Exodus 21:7-11), but there were some limits to this.
Male Hebrews could sell themselves into slavery for a six year period to eliminate their debts, after this period they might go free. However, if the male slave had been given a wife and had children with her, they would remain his master's property. They could only stay with their family by becoming permanent slaves (Exodus 21:2-5). Evangelical Christians, especially those who subscribe to Biblical inerrancy, will commonly emphasize this debt bondage and try to minimize the other forms of race-based chattel slavery when attempting to excuse the Bible for endorsing slavery.[citation needed]
Non-Hebrews, on the other hand, could (according to Leviticus 25:44) be subjected to slavery in exactly the way that it is usually understood. The slaves could be bought, sold and inherited when their owner died. This, by any standard, is race- or ethnicity-based, and Leviticus 25:44-46 explicitly allows slaves to be bought from foreign nations or foreigners living in Israel. It does say that simply kidnapping Hebrews to enslave them is a crime punishable by death (Deuteronomy 24:7), but no such prohibition exists regarding foreigners. War captives could be made slaves, assuming they had refused to make peace (this applied to women and children-men were simply killed), along with the seizure of all their property (Deuteronomy 20:10-15).
Hereditary slaves were born into slavery and there is no apparent way by which they could obtain their freedom.
So the Bible endorses various types of slavery, see below - though Biblical literalists only want to talk about one version and claim that it wasn't really so bad. <<
The moral: if you're gonna hang your hat on religion as a basis for behaviour, then be consistent with it.
Also known as "you can't have it both ways".
But when it comes to Christians who aren't Hebrews, Jews, or have anything to do with slavery.......well then just shut the fuck up, Dickhead.The fact is that we can easily find Asians, Europeans, Americans, and others who have been accused of similar charges in America. If you are willing as you and the rest of the other far right reactionary fascist filthy fuck ups to keep talking about the KKK from the 1860s, we can easily go with slave owners in America citing the Bible for justification of the evil doctrine and practice of it.
If you are going to talk about the Prophet Mohammed, then we can talk about the Crusades in the south of France in the 13th century.
When we follow the Constitution as a nation and a people, we are exceptional.
When we don't, we are like you and S. J. and digital and Yurt and Redfish and the rest of that garbage: really fucked up.
Then don't ever again use the KKK from the 1960s. Today is today. See the difference, genius?The Muslim equivalent of the Biblical defense used by the white and black slaveowner assholes arguing for slavery before the Civil War.
Except...that was before 1865.... This is today genius.............see the difference? aNd the democrats who used the bible to justify slavery back before the republicans freed the slaves were truly vile...which makes one wonder why any black American would be a member of the racist democrat party.....
Then don't ever again use the KKK from the 1960s. Today is today. See the difference, genius?The Muslim equivalent of the Biblical defense used by the white and black slaveowner assholes arguing for slavery before the Civil War.
Except...that was before 1865.... This is today genius.............see the difference? aNd the democrats who used the bible to justify slavery back before the republicans freed the slaves were truly vile...which makes one wonder why any black American would be a member of the racist democrat party.....
Idiots use Mohammed from the 700s then whine when the Christian Crusades against the Cathars in the south of France during the 13th century.
And I am sure we can find Christians and others who are practicing slavery in America today, particularly those hard core freek "Christians" who use slave child labor in their "religious' businesses.
Nope, they were offensive wars to recapture the Near East and Jerusalem.The crusades were defensive wars after the Muslims invaded Europe........
Then don't ever again use the KKK from the 1960s. Today is today. See the difference, genius?The Muslim equivalent of the Biblical defense used by the white and black slaveowner assholes arguing for slavery before the Civil War.
Except...that was before 1865.... This is today genius.............see the difference? aNd the democrats who used the bible to justify slavery back before the republicans freed the slaves were truly vile...which makes one wonder why any black American would be a member of the racist democrat party.....
Idiots use Mohammed from the 700s then whine when the Christian Crusades against the Cathars in the south of France during the 13th century.
And I am sure we can find Christians and others who are practicing slavery in America today, particularly those hard core freek "Christians" who use slave child labor in their "religious' businesses.
No twit......the democrats were racists when democrats created the klan and they are racists now, the entire party......the democrat party is obsessed with race...from la raza, to the NAACP to the congressional black caucaus to the fact that obama went to an openly and proudly racist church...the democrats never gave up their racism......
Christianity has no belief in enslaving others.....never has.......
Nope, they were offensive wars to recapture the Near East and Jerusalem. And you ignored that Crusades I mentioned were in the south of FRANCE.The crusades were defensive wars after the Muslims invaded Europe........
What a lying fuck. The Muslims were kicked out of France before 800 CE. The Christian crusades were 300 years later against the NE. The Christian crusades against fellowStupid 2aguy: "The muslims invaded France 50 years before the first Crusade, they also conquered Spain......."
The fact that you morons have the need to bring up the Christian Bible when this story is strictly about a Muslim using Muhhamed as his excuse, is fucking hillarious !!!!
There's something in the DNA of American liberals, that keeps them from simply denouncing a situation like this, without first bringing up the Bible, or Christians. You guys are utter clowns !!
