Eaglewings
Platinum Member
what question? who did i vote for? trump. why? likely same reasons you voted for hillary, if you did.any particular reason you keep changing the topic? i'm not flinging insults back at you and if that's where this si going, i'm out.can we go back up to your post were you defined hypocrite? i've not seen you attack hillary and she did a lot more than use a private e-mail address. she bought the domain and hardware for her own server for *total* control. i've yet to see you call her out and say you don't care if it's legal or not. to be 100% fair, there are no rules against this so technically it's legal. this is why they *SHOULD* clarify this BY LAW so there is no ambiguity to hide behind for either side.I really don't care if it is legal or not.
Have you ever studied law and ethics Iceberg..? He took the oath of office ... probably signed the Ethics agreement.
.
now, you're basing your hate on a "probably" at this point.
what he is doing is NOT illegal and he's hardly the ONLY one using a private address (NOT a server - what he is doing is not comparable to hillary unless you just want it to be for your own peace of mind)
now - let's look at the bigger issue and stop pretending this is only around these limited people:
5 other examples of politicians toying with the email rules
and then:
Hillary Clinton said 'my predecessors did the same thing' with email
Many politicians use private addresses, but private servers like the one Clinton used are rarely seen, said John Wonderlich, a policy director at the Sunlight Foundation, a nonpartisan group focused on government transparency, for a prior PolitiFact story.
so - is your rage at all politicians who are doing this? and do you understand why what hillary did is a HUGE step beyond a simple private e-mail address?
so it would seem you're mad at trumps people for doing this but don't seem to care about all that have done it before. THIS is why i say put laws around it and lose the ambiguity. otherwise it's nothing more than a constant whining where we only pick and choose who we get mad at for the same things others we're ok with.
please, define hypocrisy again for us.
i don't have kids. but i have taught my nieces and nephews, when they'd listen to apply the standards they set evenly and not change it according to personal preference.It is not up to us to care if it is legal you old double standard fart
I spent years teaching my boys morals..Is this Morally ok for you ?
.
is that morality ok for you?
I believe this is called 'taking a side street', deviating from the conversation we were just having, your asking me if I was minimizing what Kushner did while I was asking you not to minimize the fact that Hillary's actions were criminal. Just sayin'....Why does he even have to turn a thing over, especially when he opened this account while his father was slamming Hillary for it.
But I will go there with you, though. IMO Mueller is DESPERATE to find anything on anyone close to Trump. He will not stop until he has his own 'Scooter Libby' to justify his witch hunt when he comes up empty in his 'Don Quixote' routine charging the Russian Collusion windmill.
Iceberg
You saw me yesterday say what she did was shady...
Guess what folks I do not like her, I did not support her nor her actions..
I did end up voting for my party , like most Americans did..We had very little choice.
Now...hummm can you say the same Easy, Iceberg, or OldTree?
I doubt it..
.
Answer the question Iceberg....
.
now what does ANY of this have to do with defining what kushner did as different than hillary? nothing.
so i ask again, why do we sidetrack these things? if you don't care (as you said, don't care about legalities, you don't like the guy) then what is the point of discussion?
so - back to you.
do you understand the HUGE difference between a private account vs. private server?
do you feel what hillary did is more "scorn worthy" than what kushner did?
Kushner used a non stop server not just a private email... that make it look so innocent lol..
NonStop is a series of server computers introduced to market in 1976 by Tandem Computers Inc., beginning with the NonStop product line, which was followed by the Hewlett-Packard Integrity NonStop product line extension. Because NonStop systems are based on an integrated hardware/software stack, HP also developed a special operating system for them: NonStop OS.
NonStop systems are, to an extent, self-healing. To circumvent single points of failure, they are equipped with some redundant components. When a mainline component fails, the system automatically falls back to the backup.
.
.