So you want better paying jobs?

dear, Government is socialism.

even if only a liberal retard defines it that way? Even if it was why does it matter???? Do you have any idea???
Quite simple dear; ease of understanding.

no, why does it matter if a retard thinks govt is socialism?
Does that somehow resolve the issue between capitalism and communism or even shed light on the issue??
Very simple dear, I am not the one who has nothing but fallacy for my Cause, unlike those of your point of view.


Actually, I am pretty sure that your constant use of gibberish is some form of falllacy.
 
That in no way addressed his valid point.
dear, it explains everything; only the clueless and the Causeless don't get it.

No, it does not, and your denial was nothing but gibberish.
You are welcome to rephrase your question.

Please don't play games.

The way I phrase the question is not the problem.

Your inability or refusal to communicate clearly is the problem.
dude, dont blame me for your incompetence.

I'm not. I'm asking you to communicate clearly.

If you can't, then develop your communication skills.

If you are doing this on purpose, knock it off.
 
dear, Government is socialism.

even if only a liberal retard defines it that way? Even if it was why does it matter???? Do you have any idea???
Quite simple dear; ease of understanding.

no, why does it matter if a retard thinks govt is socialism?
Does that somehow resolve the issue between capitalism and communism or even shed light on the issue??
Very simple dear, I am not the one who has nothing but fallacy for my Cause, unlike those of your point of view.

now the liberal retard completely changes the subject and suggests Aristotle Cicero Locke Jefferson and Friedman have "fallacy for their cause", and he cant even say it in English.
 
dears, it is your own incompetence. I don't have that problem. I make sure I under the concepts if I want to debate something.


Stop it.

We understand the concepts. NO one understands your style of presenting your position and ideas.

This is about you and your issue, whatever it is.
 
dears, it is your own incompetence. I don't have that problem. I make sure I under the concepts if I want to debate something.

Dear, you said "govt is socialism". That's not English let alone a concept. Not even a liberal would agree with you.
 
dears, it is your own incompetence. I don't have that problem. I make sure I under the concepts if I want to debate something.


Stop it.

We understand the concepts. NO one understands your style of presenting your position and ideas.

This is about you and your issue, whatever it is.
like I said I don't have your problem I make sure I understand the concepts.
 
dears, it is your own incompetence. I don't have that problem. I make sure I under the concepts if I want to debate something.

Dear, you said "govt is socialism". That's not English let alone a concept. Not even a liberal would agree with you.
dear, simply having a public sector is a form of socialism. True capitalism only has a private sector. It really is that simple, except to the clueless and the Causeless.
 
True capitalism only has a private sector.
No one was more capitalist than Friedman and he had many many uses for a public sector. Nobody talks about "true capitalism" you idiot except you and then you are forced to admit you are talking about "true capitalism", not the real capitalism that the sane world talks about.

why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
 
Last edited:
yes dear, because under the truer forms of capitalism, those with the most gold make the most rules.

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

NOt all government is socialism.
dear, Government is socialism.

I already rebutted that in my previous post.

If you disagree with my definition of socialism give your own and support it.
No dear. You merely appealed to inaccurate authority.


And by "inaccurate authority" you mean a dictionary?


socialism | a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies


"any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods"
Yes dear, just political-science, jargon. You need to reference an encyclopedia.
 
True capitalism only has a private sector.
No one was more capitalist than Friedman and he had many many uses for a public sector. Nobody talks about "true capitalism" you idiot except you and then you are forced to admit you are talking about "true capitalism", not the real capitalism that the sane world talks about.

why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
nothing but repeal instead of better solution at lower cost right person on the right
 
True capitalism only has a private sector.
No one was more capitalist than Friedman and he had many many uses for a public sector. Nobody talks about "true capitalism" you idiot except you and then you are forced to admit you are talking about "true capitalism", not the real capitalism that the sane world talks about.

why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
nothing but repeal instead of better solution at lower cost right person on the right
why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
 
Today's government IS Socialism due to the fact that our current day military intertwines "Free Market" Capitalism with the need of the nation. The tax supported military has enriched entrepreneurs who sell toilet paper, pencils and light bulbs as well those who deal in food service and artillery.
Conservatives are completely full of garbage on insisting that the government programs THEY support are NOT Socialism.
 
True capitalism only has a private sector.
No one was more capitalist than Friedman and he had many many uses for a public sector. Nobody talks about "true capitalism" you idiot except you and then you are forced to admit you are talking about "true capitalism", not the real capitalism that the sane world talks about.

why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
nothing but repeal instead of better solution at lower cost right person on the right
why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
dear only the clueless and the Causeless claim what you claim.
 
Today's government IS Socialism due to the fact that our current day military intertwines "Free Market" Capitalism with the need of the nation.

dear, socialism is when the govt owns private industries. A military is usually never privately owned so not thought of as an industry. In any case owning one industry, especially if it is a quasi industry like the military, would not be enough to say the govt is socialist .

Do you understand?
 
True capitalism only has a private sector.
No one was more capitalist than Friedman and he had many many uses for a public sector. Nobody talks about "true capitalism" you idiot except you and then you are forced to admit you are talking about "true capitalism", not the real capitalism that the sane world talks about.

why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
nothing but repeal instead of better solution at lower cost right person on the right
why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
dear only the clueless and the Causeless claim what you claim.
why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
 
Today's government IS Socialism due to the fact that our current day military intertwines "Free Market" Capitalism with the need of the nation.

dear, socialism is when the govt owns private industries. A military is usually never privately owned so not thought of as an industry. In any case owning one industry, especially if it is a quasi industry like the military, would not be enough to say the govt is socialist .

Do you understand?

THOUSANDS businesses would go out of existence without our taxes feeding them via the military.
These vendors are de facto "owned" by the government.
Technicalities aside, this is Socialism.
But knee-jerk Conservatives always come up with technicalities to claim the high ground.
 
True capitalism only has a private sector.
No one was more capitalist than Friedman and he had many many uses for a public sector. Nobody talks about "true capitalism" you idiot except you and then you are forced to admit you are talking about "true capitalism", not the real capitalism that the sane world talks about.

why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
nothing but repeal instead of better solution at lower cost right person on the right
why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
dear only the clueless and the Causeless claim what you claim.
why not find a definition that says true capitalism only has a private sector or admit to being nuts?
Dear, capitalism involves voluntary social transactions that have capital consideration. The coercive use of force is baser Socialism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top