So you want better paying jobs?

"Capital morals for a price is the comparison and contrast,"


Is just as obtuse as what you said before.

I specified.


with normal word usage and sentence structure so that any normal person can understand it.


If you actually tried, you failed badly.
It seems clear to me. Want to advance any lines of reasoning to help you out, for free instead of for a capital prce?


WTF does that mean?

Are you suggesting that there is a price to using normal words and meanings?

I already told you how to do it.

"with normal word usage and sentence structure so that any normal person can understand it."
No dear. Simply coming up with red herrings and that form of diversion, is still just a fallacy.
I think we all agree that DP does not speak English well. Don't know if its learning disability or something else.

I think he has bought into the myth that brilliant people can't be understood by regular minds.

So he thinks by being obtuse, that he is making or proving himself to be brilliant.

It's pathetic nonsense of course.

Or... he's a fairly bright middle school student who has developed a program bot to post to message boards and "argue" with others by simply stringing together random buzz phrases and terms. Not a bad job for middle school but his formula definitely needs some work.
 
dear, any command economy can simply command economize to meet any exigency. It really is that simple and why I only need one liners for most rebuttals.
It seems as though you believe in magic. You've not answered my question about where the resources come from. You seem to be hung in a circular reasoning loop. Now you are into some kind of fantasy about "command economy" as if the government can simply command their economy to get better.

As the human spirit is crushed by a Socialist system that fails to deliver, this "command" element does come into play... in the form of ever-increasing commands from the ruling class. You are commanded to work harder and for less benefit. If you protest, someone is commanded to put a bullet in your head.
dearr, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism
 
It seems clear to me. Want to advance any lines of reasoning to help you out, for free instead of for a capital prce?


WTF does that mean?

Are you suggesting that there is a price to using normal words and meanings?

I already told you how to do it.

"with normal word usage and sentence structure so that any normal person can understand it."
No dear. Simply coming up with red herrings and that form of diversion, is still just a fallacy.
I think we all agree that DP does not speak English well. Don't know if its learning disability or something else.

I think he has bought into the myth that brilliant people can't be understood by regular minds.

So he thinks by being obtuse, that he is making or proving himself to be brilliant.

It's pathetic nonsense of course.

Or... he's a fairly bright middle school student who has developed a program bot to post to message boards and "argue" with others by simply stringing together random buzz phrases and terms. Not a bad job for middle school but his formula definitely needs some work.

Possibly.
 
dear, any command economy can simply command economize to meet any exigency. It really is that simple and why I only need one liners for most rebuttals.
It seems as though you believe in magic. You've not answered my question about where the resources come from. You seem to be hung in a circular reasoning loop. Now you are into some kind of fantasy about "command economy" as if the government can simply command their economy to get better.

As the human spirit is crushed by a Socialist system that fails to deliver, this "command" element does come into play... in the form of ever-increasing commands from the ruling class. You are commanded to work harder and for less benefit. If you protest, someone is commanded to put a bullet in your head.
dearr, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism

That in no way addressed his valid point.
 
dear, any command economy can simply command economize to meet any exigency. It really is that simple and why I only need one liners for most rebuttals.
It seems as though you believe in magic. You've not answered my question about where the resources come from. You seem to be hung in a circular reasoning loop. Now you are into some kind of fantasy about "command economy" as if the government can simply command their economy to get better.

As the human spirit is crushed by a Socialist system that fails to deliver, this "command" element does come into play... in the form of ever-increasing commands from the ruling class. You are commanded to work harder and for less benefit. If you protest, someone is commanded to put a bullet in your head.
dearr, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism
That in no way addressed his valid point.
dear, it explains everything; only the clueless and the Causeless don't get it.
 
dear, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism

to this retard liberal if you have govt you have socialism
yes dear, because under the truer forms of capitalism, those with the most gold make the most rules.

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

NOt all government is socialism.
dear, Government is socialism.
 
dear, any command economy can simply command economize to meet any exigency. It really is that simple and why I only need one liners for most rebuttals.
It seems as though you believe in magic. You've not answered my question about where the resources come from. You seem to be hung in a circular reasoning loop. Now you are into some kind of fantasy about "command economy" as if the government can simply command their economy to get better.

As the human spirit is crushed by a Socialist system that fails to deliver, this "command" element does come into play... in the form of ever-increasing commands from the ruling class. You are commanded to work harder and for less benefit. If you protest, someone is commanded to put a bullet in your head.
dearr, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism
That in no way addressed his valid point.
dear, it explains everything; only the clueless and the Causeless don't get it.

No, it does not, and your denial was nothing but gibberish.
 
dear, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism

to this retard liberal if you have govt you have socialism
yes dear, because under the truer forms of capitalism, those with the most gold make the most rules.

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

NOt all government is socialism.
dear, Government is socialism.

I already rebutted that in my previous post.

If you disagree with my definition of socialism give your own and support it.
 
dear, any command economy can simply command economize to meet any exigency. It really is that simple and why I only need one liners for most rebuttals.
It seems as though you believe in magic. You've not answered my question about where the resources come from. You seem to be hung in a circular reasoning loop. Now you are into some kind of fantasy about "command economy" as if the government can simply command their economy to get better.

As the human spirit is crushed by a Socialist system that fails to deliver, this "command" element does come into play... in the form of ever-increasing commands from the ruling class. You are commanded to work harder and for less benefit. If you protest, someone is commanded to put a bullet in your head.
dearr, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism
That in no way addressed his valid point.
dear, it explains everything; only the clueless and the Causeless don't get it.

No, it does not, and your denial was nothing but gibberish.
You are welcome to rephrase your question.
 
dear, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism

to this retard liberal if you have govt you have socialism
yes dear, because under the truer forms of capitalism, those with the most gold make the most rules.

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

NOt all government is socialism.
dear, Government is socialism.

I already rebutted that in my previous post.

If you disagree with my definition of socialism give your own and support it.
No dear. You merely appealed to inaccurate authority.
 
It seems as though you believe in magic. You've not answered my question about where the resources come from. You seem to be hung in a circular reasoning loop. Now you are into some kind of fantasy about "command economy" as if the government can simply command their economy to get better.

As the human spirit is crushed by a Socialist system that fails to deliver, this "command" element does come into play... in the form of ever-increasing commands from the ruling class. You are commanded to work harder and for less benefit. If you protest, someone is commanded to put a bullet in your head.
dearr, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism
That in no way addressed his valid point.
dear, it explains everything; only the clueless and the Causeless don't get it.

No, it does not, and your denial was nothing but gibberish.
You are welcome to rephrase your question.

Please don't play games.

The way I phrase the question is not the problem.

Your inability or refusal to communicate clearly is the problem.
 
dear, Government is socialism.

even if only a liberal retard defines it that way? Even if it was why does it matter???? Do you have any idea???
Quite simple dear; ease of understanding.

no, why does it matter if a retard thinks govt is socialism?
Does that somehow resolve the issue between capitalism and communism or even shed light on the issue??
Very simple dear, I am not the one who has nothing but fallacy for my Cause, unlike those of your point of view.
 
to this retard liberal if you have govt you have socialism
yes dear, because under the truer forms of capitalism, those with the most gold make the most rules.

Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production.

NOt all government is socialism.
dear, Government is socialism.

I already rebutted that in my previous post.

If you disagree with my definition of socialism give your own and support it.
No dear. You merely appealed to inaccurate authority.


And by "inaccurate authority" you mean a dictionary?


socialism | a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies


"any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods"
 
dearr, our social Contract specifies eminent domain as our form of socialism
That in no way addressed his valid point.
dear, it explains everything; only the clueless and the Causeless don't get it.

No, it does not, and your denial was nothing but gibberish.
You are welcome to rephrase your question.

Please don't play games.

The way I phrase the question is not the problem.

Your inability or refusal to communicate clearly is the problem.
dude, dont blame me for your incompetence.
 

Forum List

Back
Top