Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To me, words have meaning. To you, nothing you say means anything. You can’t be held accountable for anything you’ve said.You interpreted what I said to suit your desire to lie about me.
That's my opinion of why they sued after. It has nothing to do with if they can sue after or before.
To me, words have meaning. To you, nothing you say means anything. You can’t be held accountable for anything you’ve said.
Your opinion of why they sued after is a pathetic excuse based on a lie.
That is my point!Convicted of what?
Youre such a hack you probably actually believe this.Bullshit. I know what I said, and I know your attempts to twist said words.
No, it isn't Some sued before, some sued after, many were denied standing regardless.
Too many places changed voting rights increasing the opportunity for fraud in 2020. Several localities had more votes cast than voters. That should have sent up the red flags to investigate. None happened!Youre such a hack you probably actually believe this.
How can you or anyone else be okay with Trump and his cronies attempt to change the rules after the election? How can you be okay with trying to disenfranchise millions of legitimate voters and give them no ability to participate in the election?
Then sue before the election to have those rules changed.Too many places changed voting rights increasing the opportunity for fraud in 2020
They didn’t. This is a lie.2020. Several localities had more votes cast than voters
Only if it’s real. It’s not.That should have sent up the red flags to investigate.
Plenty happened. It didn’t matter to the lunatics on the right.None happened!
Nope.
That is my point!
Too many places changed voting rights increasing the opportunity for fraud in 2020. Several localities had more votes cast than voters. That should have sent up the red flags to investigate. None happened!
Even Democrats understand that Trump will be the nominee and could easily win.This guy is basically calling for a Court mandated coup.
The Disqualification Clause is clear — let’s use it
Does he really think 1/2 the country would accept this lying down and let the Dems get super majorities in both houses?
This is a call for civil war, plain and simple.
Not referring to him. There were about 20 people convicted of seditious conspiracy, which is the planning or incitement of insurrection.
And you’re law degree is from where ?
And you have a link ?That’s the cool thing..I don’t need a law degree, the people who wrote the cotus wrote it all down in English for anyone to read.
And you have a link ?
www.archives.gov
No, seditious conspiracy doesn’t mention insurrection. Also, there is an insurrection and rebellion statute. 14A says “anyone found to have committed insurrection”, it’s listed by name.
However, it still remains, trump himself, has not been charged with insurrection, nor seditious conspiracy. Also, oddly, if they do charge trump with seditious conspiracy, it’s the one charge that doesn’t mandate disqualification from office.
I mean, my gosh, if their goal is to prevent him from holding office, WHY won’t they charge him with 18 US 2383? Other than treason, it’s the only other offense that carries DQ from office.
And then, they still have to debate the merits of the wording of the 14A, and if it includes a president..
Nope.To the constitution? Sure
The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription
[get-content name="print-page-left" include-tag="false" /] Note: The following text is a transcription of the Constitution as it was inscribed by Jacob Shallus on parchment (the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum.) The spelling and punctuation reflect the original.
Seditious conspiracy doesn't mention insurrection because it's not insurrection. Insurrection is insurrection. As I so eloquently stated, Seditious conspiracy is the planning or incitement of insurrection...
Understanding Insurrection and Sedition
CSIS security experts define acts of sedition and insurrection and evaluate the seriousness of both charges.www.csis.org
Generally, sedition is conduct or speech that incites individuals to violently rebel against the authority of the government. Insurrection includes the actual acts of violence and rebellion.
As far as charging Trump, that's not a required element of the 14th Amendment for states to act on it.
As far as charging Trump, that's not a required element of the 14th Amendment for states to act on it.
Oh really? So, a state can just unilaterally decide someone is guilty of insurrection without charging them?
well apparently that’s not working because Colorado decided that the insurrection act didn’t apply to a president..
So, just for refresher, a state can disqualify a candidate without ever charging them with insurrection or treason…that sound about right?
So you would rather have just the Democrat party rule without opposition? Good to know piece of dogshit.Yes, that's right. It's happened before. There's precedent.
So you would rather have just the Democrat party rule without opposition? Good to know piece of dogshit.
