Something Wicked This Way Comes for Clinton and Brazile

[Lumpy 1]

More Okeefe crap. I guess that's what the right has degenerated to. Sad.

While the degenerates on the left are diddling girly parts as news... right.

 

[Tom Horn]

We all know this line of horseshit is to get illegals voting thereby stealing elections.. You fucking liberals are beyond busted through Wikileaks and NO ONE will ever again believe a word any of you slime from your lying corrupt mouths. Put a fucking sock in it.

Illegals do not vote,PERIOD. Time to give up your bullshyte which has no basis in fact

"bullshyte"? So what part of Dublin are you posting from, potato-brain?

 

[Tom Horn]

O'keefe ROCKS! The stalinists tried to jail him for exposing the monsters at planned parenthood but the case was thrown out. It should be mentioned here that Paul Ryan allowed pp to be fully funded again for next year and took a $10K donation from Soros. That's who Paul Ryan is and I'd rather see his seat lost to a Rat than having him serve another minute as Speaker.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

O'keefe ROCKS! The stalinists tried to jail him for exposing the monsters at planned parenthood but the case was thrown out. It should be mentioned here that Paul Ryan allowed pp to be fully funded again for next year and took a $10K donation from Soros. That's who Paul Ryan is and I'd rather see his seat lost to a Rat than having him serve another minute as Speaker.

Just like Julian Assange.. Fascists HATE free speech unless they agree with it.. They're about to embark on a war they can't even imagine fucking around with Patriots.. Wiki is majorly pissed off now.. the world see's Obama and Clinton as TYRANTS threatening Assange..

 

[Tom Horn]

O'keefe ROCKS! The stalinists tried to jail him for exposing the monsters at planned parenthood but the case was thrown out. It should be mentioned here that Paul Ryan allowed pp to be fully funded again for next year and took a $10K donation from Soros. That's who Paul Ryan is and I'd rather see his seat lost to a Rat than having him serve another minute as Speaker.

Just like Julian Assange.. Fascists HATE free speech unless they agree with it.. They're about to embark on a war they can't even imagine fucking around with Patriots.. Wiki is majorly pissed off now.. the world see's Obama and Clinton as TYRANTS threatening Assange..

And here's the House committees saying "it will take months" to get to the bottom of the corruption. HELLO? Why aren't they issuing subpoenas this week? Their job is to end this shit, not investigate how it happened year after year....lazy peckerwoods.

 

[phoenyx]

Here ya go DUMB DUMB.. more proof.

Non-Citizens Are Voting, by John Fund, National Review

That's not proof at all. Here's an article on some of Okeefe's antics in 2014, which is the year your article was published in:
Colorado Dems: We caught James O'Keefe and his friends trying to bait us into condoning voter fraud

Here's a little excerpt from an article on Okeefe published on Wednesday:
**
O’Keefe has a long history of engaging in criminal, misogynistic, ethically dubious, and bizarre behavior related to his video stunts. He has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of entering a government office under false pretenses; sought to set up a video “sting” in which he would lure a female CNN reporter onto a boat filled with sex toys and attempt to seduce the reporter on camera; and had to pay a former video target $100,000 and publicly apologize in a legal settlement.

O’Keefe’s videos often make a big splash, but they fall apart under scrutiny by reporters and state investigations. His past work attempting to document the ease of voter fraud is no different. In 2012, Project Veritas released videos that O’Keefe claimed proved “widespread voter fraud” in several states and the District of Columbia. But the videos did not show any instances of voter fraud -- or voting at all. Instead, the videos showed actors almost committing a crime by attempting to obtain the ballots of other people under false pretenses, and they accidentally illustrated how difficult it would be to commit actual voter fraud. O’Keefe claimed that another video showed voter fraud in North Carolina, including “ballots being offered out in the name of the dead” and “non-citizens voting." But the “dead” voter from the video was not actually dead, and the “non-citizen” in the video had become a U.S. citizen decades earlier.

Media outlets were able to point out O’Keefe’s deceptive edits because Project Veritas previously released unedited raw footage from its hidden camera stings. The group has not done so for its latest election projects. Instead, media outlets reporting on the videos are relying solely on the snippets of video and the context that O’Keefe provides.

That matters because O’Keefe’s two latest videos edit down footage from undercover operatives working over a period of several months into 34 minutes of narrated video purporting to show progressive operatives “rigging the election.” “The editing raises questions about what was said and what may come out later,” as The Washington Post’s David Weigel pointed out.

As Time magazine’s Philip Elliott noted following a review of the videos, “Without the full context” omitted by the O’Keefe videos, “it’s impossible to know” what one operative meant in a quote featured in one of the videos, and that “there’s no way of telling if that person said what the tape purports” in another case. He says that exculpatory information showing operatives refusing to engage in voter fraud appears to have been excised; he notes that while some such commentary remains, it comes “long after viewers are convinced they are watching Watergate unfold in real time.”

That’s the review from a reporter who is viewing the tapes skeptically. No such skepticism is in evidence at the launching pad for the videos: Breitbart News. The right-wing website, which has been among Trump’s biggest boosters, received the exclusive on the first the videos O’Keefe released this week and has produced severalstories on the allegations.
**

Source: The James O’Keefe - Donald Trump - Breitbart News Nexus

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Here ya go DUMB DUMB.. more proof.

Non-Citizens Are Voting, by John Fund, National Review

That's not proof at all. Here's an article on some of Okeefe's antics in 2014, which is the year your article was published in:
Colorado Dems: We caught James O'Keefe and his friends trying to bait us into condoning voter fraud

Here's a little excerpt from an article on Okeefe published on Wednesday:
**
O’Keefe has a long history of engaging in criminal, misogynistic, ethically dubious, and bizarre behavior related to his video stunts. He has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of entering a government office under false pretenses; sought to set up a video “sting” in which he would lure a female CNN reporter onto a boat filled with sex toys and attempt to seduce the reporter on camera; and had to pay a former video target $100,000 and publicly apologize in a legal settlement.

O’Keefe’s videos often make a big splash, but they fall apart under scrutiny by reporters and state investigations. His past work attempting to document the ease of voter fraud is no different. In 2012, Project Veritas released videos that O’Keefe claimed proved “widespread voter fraud” in several states and the District of Columbia. But the videos did not show any instances of voter fraud -- or voting at all. Instead, the videos showed actors almost committing a crime by attempting to obtain the ballots of other people under false pretenses, and they accidentally illustrated how difficult it would be to commit actual voter fraud. O’Keefe claimed that another video showed voter fraud in North Carolina, including “ballots being offered out in the name of the dead” and “non-citizens voting." But the “dead” voter from the video was not actually dead, and the “non-citizen” in the video had become a U.S. citizen decades earlier.

Media outlets were able to point out O’Keefe’s deceptive edits because Project Veritas previously released unedited raw footage from its hidden camera stings. The group has not done so for its latest election projects. Instead, media outlets reporting on the videos are relying solely on the snippets of video and the context that O’Keefe provides.

That matters because O’Keefe’s two latest videos edit down footage from undercover operatives working over a period of several months into 34 minutes of narrated video purporting to show progressive operatives “rigging the election.” “The editing raises questions about what was said and what may come out later,” as The Washington Post’s David Weigel pointed out.

As Time magazine’s Philip Elliott noted following a review of the videos, “Without the full context” omitted by the O’Keefe videos, “it’s impossible to know” what one operative meant in a quote featured in one of the videos, and that “there’s no way of telling if that person said what the tape purports” in another case. He says that exculpatory information showing operatives refusing to engage in voter fraud appears to have been excised; he notes that while some such commentary remains, it comes “long after viewers are convinced they are watching Watergate unfold in real time.”

That’s the review from a reporter who is viewing the tapes skeptically. No such skepticism is in evidence at the launching pad for the videos: Breitbart News. The right-wing website, which has been among Trump’s biggest boosters, received the exclusive on the first the videos O’Keefe released this week and has produced severalstories on the allegations.
**

Source: The James O’Keefe - Donald Trump - Breitbart News Nexus

 

[L.K.Eder]

still in the editing pipeline, lol. this will be yuuge

 

[phoenyx]

Here ya go DUMB DUMB.. more proof.

Non-Citizens Are Voting, by John Fund, National Review

That's not proof at all. Here's an article on some of Okeefe's antics in 2014, which is the year your article was published in:
Colorado Dems: We caught James O'Keefe and his friends trying to bait us into condoning voter fraud

Here's a little excerpt from an article on Okeefe published on Wednesday:
**
O’Keefe has a long history of engaging in criminal, misogynistic, ethically dubious, and bizarre behavior related to his video stunts. He has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of entering a government office under false pretenses; sought to set up a video “sting” in which he would lure a female CNN reporter onto a boat filled with sex toys and attempt to seduce the reporter on camera; and had to pay a former video target $100,000 and publicly apologize in a legal settlement.

O’Keefe’s videos often make a big splash, but they fall apart under scrutiny by reporters and state investigations. His past work attempting to document the ease of voter fraud is no different. In 2012, Project Veritas released videos that O’Keefe claimed proved “widespread voter fraud” in several states and the District of Columbia. But the videos did not show any instances of voter fraud -- or voting at all. Instead, the videos showed actors almost committing a crime by attempting to obtain the ballots of other people under false pretenses, and they accidentally illustrated how difficult it would be to commit actual voter fraud. O’Keefe claimed that another video showed voter fraud in North Carolina, including “ballots being offered out in the name of the dead” and “non-citizens voting." But the “dead” voter from the video was not actually dead, and the “non-citizen” in the video had become a U.S. citizen decades earlier.

Media outlets were able to point out O’Keefe’s deceptive edits because Project Veritas previously released unedited raw footage from its hidden camera stings. The group has not done so for its latest election projects. Instead, media outlets reporting on the videos are relying solely on the snippets of video and the context that O’Keefe provides.

That matters because O’Keefe’s two latest videos edit down footage from undercover operatives working over a period of several months into 34 minutes of narrated video purporting to show progressive operatives “rigging the election.” “The editing raises questions about what was said and what may come out later,” as The Washington Post’s David Weigel pointed out.

As Time magazine’s Philip Elliott noted following a review of the videos, “Without the full context” omitted by the O’Keefe videos, “it’s impossible to know” what one operative meant in a quote featured in one of the videos, and that “there’s no way of telling if that person said what the tape purports” in another case. He says that exculpatory information showing operatives refusing to engage in voter fraud appears to have been excised; he notes that while some such commentary remains, it comes “long after viewers are convinced they are watching Watergate unfold in real time.”

That’s the review from a reporter who is viewing the tapes skeptically. No such skepticism is in evidence at the launching pad for the videos: Breitbart News. The right-wing website, which has been among Trump’s biggest boosters, received the exclusive on the first the videos O’Keefe released this week and has produced severalstories on the allegations.
**

Source: The James O’Keefe - Donald Trump - Breitbart News Nexus

Sigh, I tried -.-...

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Here ya go DUMB DUMB.. more proof.

Non-Citizens Are Voting, by John Fund, National Review

That's not proof at all. Here's an article on some of Okeefe's antics in 2014, which is the year your article was published in:
Colorado Dems: We caught James O'Keefe and his friends trying to bait us into condoning voter fraud

Here's a little excerpt from an article on Okeefe published on Wednesday:
**
O’Keefe has a long history of engaging in criminal, misogynistic, ethically dubious, and bizarre behavior related to his video stunts. He has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of entering a government office under false pretenses; sought to set up a video “sting” in which he would lure a female CNN reporter onto a boat filled with sex toys and attempt to seduce the reporter on camera; and had to pay a former video target $100,000 and publicly apologize in a legal settlement.

O’Keefe’s videos often make a big splash, but they fall apart under scrutiny by reporters and state investigations. His past work attempting to document the ease of voter fraud is no different. In 2012, Project Veritas released videos that O’Keefe claimed proved “widespread voter fraud” in several states and the District of Columbia. But the videos did not show any instances of voter fraud -- or voting at all. Instead, the videos showed actors almost committing a crime by attempting to obtain the ballots of other people under false pretenses, and they accidentally illustrated how difficult it would be to commit actual voter fraud. O’Keefe claimed that another video showed voter fraud in North Carolina, including “ballots being offered out in the name of the dead” and “non-citizens voting." But the “dead” voter from the video was not actually dead, and the “non-citizen” in the video had become a U.S. citizen decades earlier.

Media outlets were able to point out O’Keefe’s deceptive edits because Project Veritas previously released unedited raw footage from its hidden camera stings. The group has not done so for its latest election projects. Instead, media outlets reporting on the videos are relying solely on the snippets of video and the context that O’Keefe provides.

That matters because O’Keefe’s two latest videos edit down footage from undercover operatives working over a period of several months into 34 minutes of narrated video purporting to show progressive operatives “rigging the election.” “The editing raises questions about what was said and what may come out later,” as The Washington Post’s David Weigel pointed out.

As Time magazine’s Philip Elliott noted following a review of the videos, “Without the full context” omitted by the O’Keefe videos, “it’s impossible to know” what one operative meant in a quote featured in one of the videos, and that “there’s no way of telling if that person said what the tape purports” in another case. He says that exculpatory information showing operatives refusing to engage in voter fraud appears to have been excised; he notes that while some such commentary remains, it comes “long after viewers are convinced they are watching Watergate unfold in real time.”

That’s the review from a reporter who is viewing the tapes skeptically. No such skepticism is in evidence at the launching pad for the videos: Breitbart News. The right-wing website, which has been among Trump’s biggest boosters, received the exclusive on the first the videos O’Keefe released this week and has produced severalstories on the allegations.
**

Source: The James O’Keefe - Donald Trump - Breitbart News Nexus

Sigh, I tried -.-...

Save it lefty liar. Wikileaks has outed you lying criminal scum on the left.. no one believes a fucking word you dummies spew

 

[Tom Horn]

Sigh, I tried -.-...

You forgot the second part....you tried but we didn't give you enough money to succeed.

 

[phoenyx]

Here ya go DUMB DUMB.. more proof.

Non-Citizens Are Voting, by John Fund, National Review

That's not proof at all. Here's an article on some of Okeefe's antics in 2014, which is the year your article was published in:
Colorado Dems: We caught James O'Keefe and his friends trying to bait us into condoning voter fraud

Here's a little excerpt from an article on Okeefe published on Wednesday:
**
O’Keefe has a long history of engaging in criminal, misogynistic, ethically dubious, and bizarre behavior related to his video stunts. He has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of entering a government office under false pretenses; sought to set up a video “sting” in which he would lure a female CNN reporter onto a boat filled with sex toys and attempt to seduce the reporter on camera; and had to pay a former video target $100,000 and publicly apologize in a legal settlement.

O’Keefe’s videos often make a big splash, but they fall apart under scrutiny by reporters and state investigations. His past work attempting to document the ease of voter fraud is no different. In 2012, Project Veritas released videos that O’Keefe claimed proved “widespread voter fraud” in several states and the District of Columbia. But the videos did not show any instances of voter fraud -- or voting at all. Instead, the videos showed actors almost committing a crime by attempting to obtain the ballots of other people under false pretenses, and they accidentally illustrated how difficult it would be to commit actual voter fraud. O’Keefe claimed that another video showed voter fraud in North Carolina, including “ballots being offered out in the name of the dead” and “non-citizens voting." But the “dead” voter from the video was not actually dead, and the “non-citizen” in the video had become a U.S. citizen decades earlier.

Media outlets were able to point out O’Keefe’s deceptive edits because Project Veritas previously released unedited raw footage from its hidden camera stings. The group has not done so for its latest election projects. Instead, media outlets reporting on the videos are relying solely on the snippets of video and the context that O’Keefe provides.

That matters because O’Keefe’s two latest videos edit down footage from undercover operatives working over a period of several months into 34 minutes of narrated video purporting to show progressive operatives “rigging the election.” “The editing raises questions about what was said and what may come out later,” as The Washington Post’s David Weigel pointed out.

As Time magazine’s Philip Elliott noted following a review of the videos, “Without the full context” omitted by the O’Keefe videos, “it’s impossible to know” what one operative meant in a quote featured in one of the videos, and that “there’s no way of telling if that person said what the tape purports” in another case. He says that exculpatory information showing operatives refusing to engage in voter fraud appears to have been excised; he notes that while some such commentary remains, it comes “long after viewers are convinced they are watching Watergate unfold in real time.”

That’s the review from a reporter who is viewing the tapes skeptically. No such skepticism is in evidence at the launching pad for the videos: Breitbart News. The right-wing website, which has been among Trump’s biggest boosters, received the exclusive on the first the videos O’Keefe released this week and has produced severalstories on the allegations.
**

Source: The James O’Keefe - Donald Trump - Breitbart News Nexus

Sigh, I tried -.-...

Save it lefty liar.

Lefty liar huh? So does that make you see no evil Jane ? Anyway, what exactly do you think I lied about?

Wikileaks has outed you lying criminal scum on the left.. no one believes a fucking word you dummies spew

Reminds me when some empire type is talking of "rebel scum" -.-. I'm not against Wikileaks. I don't support Hillary Clinton, I support Jill Stein.

 

[phoenyx]

Sigh, I tried -.-...

You forgot the second part....you tried but we didn't give you enough money to succeed.

Does that mean I'm a government shill? Faun, you see this? I have now joined your ranks .

 

[Tom Horn]

Reminds me when some empire type is talking of "rebel scum" -.-. I'm not against Wikileaks. I don't support Hillary Clinton, I support Jill Stein.

A vote for anybody but Trump is a vote for the diaper-wearing, colostomy bagged, epileptic old criminal Clinton.

 

[Tom Horn]

Sigh, I tried -.-...

You forgot the second part....you tried but we didn't give you enough money to succeed.

Does that mean I'm a government shill? Faun, you see this? I have now joined your ranks .

Tomorrow I will prove to the board that there truly are a legion of PAID leftist agitators on these boards.

 

[phoenyx]

Reminds me when some empire type is talking of "rebel scum" -.-. I'm not against Wikileaks. I don't support Hillary Clinton, I support Jill Stein.

A vote for anybody but Trump is a vote for the diaper-wearing, colostomy bagged, epileptic old criminal Clinton.

I'll just quote a few lines from an article on Jill Stein...
**
OF COURSE, Trump and Clinton are not the same. One is a greater evil and the other a lesser evil. But you can't stop the greater evil by voting for the lesser one. History has proven this.

When you vote for the Democrats as a lesser evil, they take you for granted and take you for a ride, betraying all their promises in the process. With no pressure from the left, they move to the right and implement the greater evil's program.

Remember that Bill Clinton is the one who implemented NAFTA, destroyed welfare, institutionalized the New Jim Crow, signed the Defense of Marriage Act, repealed the Glass-Steagall financial regulations and set us on a course for war in Iraq. Remember that Barack Obama bailed out the banks, imposed neoliberal austerity on unions, finalized the Trans-Pacific Partnership, deported 2 million immigrants, conducted endless surveillance and entrapment of Arabs and Muslims, and launched an illegal drone war all around the world.
**

Source: A vote for the greater good, not the lesser evil

 

[Coyote]

Project Veritas is going to release something (tape? audio?) on Monday that implicates Clinton and Donna Brazile.

James O'Keefe on Twitter

The WikiLeaks release on Tim Kaine and Brazile is still in the pipeline so next week (if they release in that time frame) should be pretty busy for Donna. I suspect they will wait until the Project Veritas release makes it rounds before dropping more dirt/corruption for everyone to see.

Ah man...that was such a good Ray Bradbury book

I think..with Wikileaks - it's a big massive data dump with no time for contextualizing, verifying or anything.

I'm pretty skeptical of O'Keefe

 

[phoenyx]

Sigh, I tried -.-...

You forgot the second part....you tried but we didn't give you enough money to succeed.

Does that mean I'm a government shill? Faun, you see this? I have now joined your ranks .

Tomorrow I will prove to the board that there truly are a legion of PAID leftist agitators on these boards.

I await with bated breath -.-...

 

[Carla_Danger]

Project Veritas is going to release something (tape? audio?) on Monday that implicates Clinton and Donna Brazile.

James O'Keefe on Twitter

The WikiLeaks release on Tim Kaine and Brazile is still in the pipeline so next week (if they release in that time frame) should be pretty busy for Donna. I suspect they will wait until the Project Veritas release makes it rounds before dropping more dirt/corruption for everyone to see.

Ah man...that was such a good Ray Bradbury book

I think..with Wikileaks - it's a big massive data dump with no time for contextualizing, verifying or anything.

I'm pretty skeptical of O'Keefe

O'Keefe has been in trouble for his edited videos before. Is he still on probation?

 

[Coyote]

Sigh, I tried -.-...

You forgot the second part....you tried but we didn't give you enough money to succeed.

Does that mean I'm a government shill? Faun, you see this? I have now joined your ranks .

Tomorrow I will prove to the board that there truly are a legion of PAID leftist agitators on these boards.

Please don't. In addition to my lucrative income from USMB...this supplements my welfare check. There is no way I'll be able to support my dogs without my professional shill paycheck.