Son is shot by 2 thugs...mother uses concealed pistol to stop the attack...too bad....right?

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,239
52,463
Yes...it is too bad that this mother had a gun....I mean, sure, the two thugs who shot her son in front of her probably only had the best of intentions....she should have realized the two thugs were terrible shots...they hit the son in his feet....so of course there was no need for her to overreact to the shooting of her son...

True...we don't know the prior relationship between the son and these two violent thugs....

Video Concealed Carrying Mom Opens Fire on Man Who Shot Her 13 Year Old Son in Public

’m sure we’ll find out that there is more to this story in the near future. However, it seems to be a clear cut defensive gun use at its core.
A mother and 13 year old son were out shopping when a man walked up to them and opened fire on her son, striking him twice in the feet.

The mother then drew her concealed handgun and opened fire on the shooter and one other suspect, causing them to flee.

According to a local Fox affiliate, the mother knew the attackers:

The mom, who doesn’t want to be identified, said she immediately recognized one of the suspects Kevin Hayden, when he walked up to Wilson Market Sunday. She says Hayden and his friends have been harassing her for years, after breaking into her home.
 
Yes...it is too bad that this mother had a gun....I mean, sure, the two thugs who shot her son in front of her probably only had the best of intentions....she should have realized the two thugs were terrible shots...they hit the son in his feet....so of course there was no need for her to overreact to the shooting of her son...

True...we don't know the prior relationship between the son and these two violent thugs....

Video Concealed Carrying Mom Opens Fire on Man Who Shot Her 13 Year Old Son in Public

’m sure we’ll find out that there is more to this story in the near future. However, it seems to be a clear cut defensive gun use at its core.
A mother and 13 year old son were out shopping when a man walked up to them and opened fire on her son, striking him twice in the feet.

The mother then drew her concealed handgun and opened fire on the shooter and one other suspect, causing them to flee.

According to a local Fox affiliate, the mother knew the attackers:

The mom, who doesn’t want to be identified, said she immediately recognized one of the suspects Kevin Hayden, when he walked up to Wilson Market Sunday. She says Hayden and his friends have been harassing her for years, after breaking into her home.


Effective gun control would have left two dead punks.

Too bad she couldn't shoot straight.

Link would not open, but I assume she didn't hit one, or both.

Hope nobody caught a stray.

Not a fan of those who carry, shoot and MISS.
 
"Son is shot by 2 thugs...mother uses concealed pistol to stop the attack...too bad....right?"

Too anecdotal, devoid of rational, objective, factual analysis, not representative, and consequently irrelevant, failing as a hasty generalization fallacy.
 
Who is the OP talking too? He seems to answer his own questions very proudly for no reason
 
I am addressing the people who believe it is better for the mother and son to quietly submit to their attackers...
 
I am addressing the people who believe it is better for the mother and son to quietly submit to their attackers...
Is this the only way you can convey this message, because the MO is getting old....
 
As are the anti gunners...but they keep up their attempts regardless of the reality....
 
Possible reasons:

The mother and son were white and therefore deserved to be shot.
The mother could have killed two people, whereas the attackers would only have killed her son.
Mother and son were one-percenters compared to the men who were shot.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
 
Ot
"Son is shot by 2 thugs...mother uses concealed pistol to stop the attack...too bad....right?"

Too anecdotal, devoid of rational, objective, factual analysis, not representative, and consequently irrelevant, failing as a hasty generalization fallacy.
otherwise you support the thugs and not the right of the mother to protect her son, right? typical libtard.
 
What do you call that Strawman? Did you name him?

Really, a Straw man....and what do you say about those people who do not believe you have a right to carry a gun to protect yourself....since, if the decision is left to them, all of the victims who use a gun to stop a violent attack...would be left defenseless....

Unless you are suggesting that violent criminal attacks never happen...in which case there would be no need to defend oneself with a weapon of any kind...is that what you are suggesting?
 
"Son is shot by 2 thugs...mother uses concealed pistol to stop the attack...too bad....right?"

Too anecdotal, devoid of rational, objective, factual analysis, not representative, and consequently irrelevant, failing as a hasty generalization fallacy.

the closeted gun banner again?
 

Forum List

Back
Top