Shogun
Free: Mudholes Stomped
- Jan 8, 2007
- 30,528
- 2,263
- 1,045
- Thread starter
- #81
Finally, something I can get on board with.
So someone should get denied benefits just because they smoked a joint? Wow, you republican religous wackos are really amazing. So in short, you are allowed to get drunk as hell, pound a couple 40's and get shitface drunk and get your benefits. But smoke a joint and you are not worthy of getting your money. Fucking amazing how stupid our society is. We can't get anything right.
Would you call me a religious wacko, you dumb son of a whore? This isn't about alcohol being legal while pot is not. THIS is about the priorities of someone taking money from the state. If you have the money to smoke a bowl then you don't need tax money. If you can't SAY NO TO A JOINT PASSED YOUR WAY then you are clearly not a burden that the state should carry.
Wanna know the punchline? I smoke pot EVERY DAY. Wanna know what is even finnier? I CAN SUPPORT MYSELF. And, richer still? IF I LOSE MY JOB THEN SMOKING POT IS OUTWEIGHED BY GETTING A JOB.. that will more than likely piss test me anyway. so, if you can't stop smoking bud during the period that you are out of work and living off of the tax payer tit.. well, too fucking bad.