Steward Rhodes charged with seditious conspiracy

Status
Not open for further replies.
You know they were originally chosen to be on that committee and they were refused, Also the great Jim Banks.. why not allow Republicans to ask questions?

okey dokey, let's play ...

why weren't any (D)S on the benghaziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii hearings?
 
okey dokey, let's play ...

why weren't any (D)S on the benghaziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii hearings?
Now you want equality? Lol
 
So no one brought a gun, they left it in the car lol ok well if you were trying to overthrow the government Wouldn’t you use a gun?

weapons were a plenty. are guns the only means to subdue or kill somebody?


The people responsible for ushering people into the capital are ray epps the man that was standing on a high beam unidentified,

credible unbiased link?


a man removing glass from a window, wearing a wire, oath keepers leader, who just now got arrested charged with a crime that he won’t be found guilty of.. do yourself a favor go to revolver. Com
It’s amazing all these questions have been answered for you.

lol ...

Revolver.News​

Last updated on April 18th, 2021 at 12:23 pm

Revolver.News - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Fake News - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Revolver.News right biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing techniques and a complete lack of transparency.

Funded by / Ownership

Revolver.News lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Advertising, donations, and a shop that sells branded merchandise generate revenue.

Revolver.News


'nuff said.
 
Now you want equality? Lol

Daily Caller​

Last updated on November 17th, 2021 at 09:27 am

Daily Caller - Right Biased - Conservative - Republican - Libertarian - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


RIGHT BIAS​

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Daily Caller strongly right biased based on story selection that almost always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks. The Daily Caller is a source that needs to be fact-checked on a per-article basis.
Daily Caller

you're not very good at this, sergei.
 
weapons were a plenty. are guns the only means to subdue or kill somebody?




credible unbiased link?




lol ...

Revolver.News​

Last updated on April 18th, 2021 at 12:23 pm

Revolver.News - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Fake News - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Revolver.News right biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing techniques and a complete lack of transparency.

Funded by / Ownership

Revolver.News lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Advertising, donations, and a shop that sells branded merchandise generate revenue.

Revolver.News


'nuff said.
Lol you need brown shirts to tell what to read? Lol what happened to liberals? you folks are openly anti-Free Press.

listen You will never be able to convince a jury of your peers that anybody wanted to overthrow the government that day without using guns. The only people that died that day was Trump supporters. Capital police for throwing flash bangs into peaceful crowds. What did you think was going to happen?
 
Poor little drunk know nothing. Desperate to deflect from the FACT that Pisslosi’s emails and phone messages are certainly relevant to the events of that day. Still no insurrection charges loser. Filed under you’re a crying liar. Pathetic.

oh dear - still a deflection from turtleboy?

lol ....
 
Lol you need brown shirts to tell what to read?

clever. i never post anything without back up from credible, unbiased university accepted sources.

next?


Lol what happened to liberals? you folks are openly anti-Free Press.

except i believe in the 1st amendment - you know ... from the US constitution .

next?


listen You will never be able to convince a jury of your peers that anybody wanted to overthrow the government that day without using guns.

lol ...


The only people that died that day was Trump supporters.

that day. 4 suicides were a direct result of that day.


Capital police for throwing flash bangs into peaceful crowds. What did you think was going to happen?

the capital police that weren't trump humpers were on the defense that day.

 
clever. i never post anything without back up from credible, unbiased university accepted sources.

next?




except i believe in the 1st amendment - you know ... from the US constitution .

next?




lol ...




that day. 4 suicides were a direct result of that day.




the capital police that weren't trump humpers were on the defense that day.


You should change your name to fallacy.. you paint the broad bush for all conservative news outlets. It’s disgusting how you attack free press. You should learn history . Ppl have a right to make a decision on there own what’s true what’s not true.
 
You should change your name to fallacy..

ooooOOOoooo....


you paint the broad bush for all conservative news outlets.

wrong. just the fake ones. that's why i always check their media bias & reporting stats.

next?


It’s disgusting how you attack free press.

lol ... i never said they should be taken down. learn what FREE press means, sergei.


You should learn history .

ditto. start with the colonists.

Ppl have a right to make a decision on there own what’s true what’s not true.

that's absurd. facts are facts no matter what you want to think, feel, believe.

& you can't change it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top